Please wait a minute...
档案学研究  2015, Vol. 29 Issue (5): 48-53    DOI: 10.16065/j.cnki.issn1002-1620.2015.05.007
档案法规标准     
中外政府信息公开范围制度设计差异及其启示——兼谈《中华人民共和国档案法》第一条的修改
蒋卫荣
苏州大学 苏州 215123
Differences in System Design of the Disclosure Scope of Government Information between China and Foreign Countries and Its Inspiration
weirong Jiang
School of Society, Soochow University, Suzhou, 215123
 全文: PDF(700 KB)   HTML
摘要:

2007年4月,国务院颁布了《中华人民共和国政府信息公开条例》,并于次年5月1日始正式实施。揆诸世界各国如美、英、日等国的《信息自由法》可以发现,中外对于政府信息公开立法中公开范围的制度设计可谓大异其趣。这种迥异是立法理念与原则的产物,由此也导致了自《条例》实施数年来政府信息公开的执行情况仍然不尽如人意的效果与结果。我们以为,问题解决的关键还需遵从现代政府信息公开立法的一般法理,重塑并重构政府信息公开立法理念与理论,从而实现从“知的需求”到“知的权利”的制度转型与跨越。本文还就《中华人民共和国档案法》第一条的修改谈了一些个人看法。

关键词: 政府信息公开公开范围知的需要知的权利《政府信息公开条例》《档案法》修改    
Abstract:

The State Council issued Regulations of the People's Republic of China on the Disclosure of Government Information in April 2007 and put it into effect officially in May 2008. China’s system design of the disclosure scope of the government information is quite different from foreign countries when compared with The Freedom of Information Act of USA, Britain, Japan, etc. The difference is not incidental, and it is the product of legislative concept and principle so that the implement has been still unsatisfactory during several years after the regulation was put into effect. In our opinion, the key to solve the problem is to rebuild and reconstruct legislative concept and principle of the disclosure of the government information according to the general jurisprudence of the disclosure of modern government information, so as to realize the transformation from the Need to Know to the Right to Know. This article also presents some personal opinions about the amendment of the first article of Archives Law of the People's Republic of China.

Key words: Disclosure of govement information    Disclosure scope    Need to know    Right to know    Regulations of Disclosure of Goverment Information of P.R.China    Amendment of Archives Law of P.R.China
出版日期: 2017-11-16
服务  
把本文推荐给朋友
加入引用管理器
E-mail Alert
RSS
作者相关文章  
蒋卫荣

引用本文:

蒋卫荣. 中外政府信息公开范围制度设计差异及其启示——兼谈《中华人民共和国档案法》第一条的修改[J]. 档案学研究, 2015, 29(5): 48-53.

weirong Jiang. Differences in System Design of the Disclosure Scope of Government Information between China and Foreign Countries and Its Inspiration. Archives Science Study, 2015, 29(5): 48-53.

链接本文:

http://daxyj.idangan.cn/CN/10.16065/j.cnki.issn1002-1620.2015.05.007        http://daxyj.idangan.cn/CN/Y2015/V29/I5/48

1 齐爱民.电子化政府背景下的政府信息公开法[M].武汉:武汉大学出版社,2004.
2 Freedom of Information Act 2000 ,PART Ⅱ EXEMPT INFORMATIONS.
3 Access to Information of Act,EXEMPTIONS.
4 朱芒.开放型政府的法律理念和实践——日本的信息公开制度.环球法律评论. 2002(秋季号、冬季号).
5 美国信息自由法案.徐新华译自美国司法部网站.
6 美国信息自由法案.徐新华译自美国司法部网站.
7 孙琬钟.进一步推动政府信息公开,建设透明政府. ]孙琬钟.进一步推动政府信息公开,建设透明政府.中国法学会网,2012.12.12.
8 蒋红珍.从“知的需要”到“知的权利”:政府信息依申请公开制度的困境及其超越[J].政法论坛,2012(06).
9 周永坤.网络实名制立法评析[J].暨南学报,2013(02).