欧洲大陆国家档案鉴定理论与鉴定方法论发展述评

doi:10.16065/j.cnki.issn1002-1620.2013.03.019

档案学研究

2013, Vol. 27

Issue (3): 81-86 DOI: 10.16065/j.cnki.issn1002-1620.2013.03.019

欧洲大陆国家档案鉴定理论与鉴定方法论发展述评

宋魏巍

中国人民大学信息资源管理学院北京 100872

A Critical Review on Archival Appraisal Theories and Methodologies in European Mainland Countries

Weiwei Song

School of Information Resource Management at Renmin University of China Beijing 100872

全文: PDF(492 KB) HTML

摘要：

本文从欧洲大陆国家档案鉴定思想发展与演变的角度出发,对档案鉴定理论与方法论选择过程中的争论进行梳理,并对意大利、法国、德国档案鉴定思想进行了评价。内容分析法和结构分析法是欧洲大陆国家档案鉴定中采用的主要分析方法,前者关注文件的内容,后者关注文件所反映的组织结构。这两种分析方法的支撑原则分别是事由原则与来源原则。这两种原则在档案整理与著录中的差异较为明显,但是在鉴定中却可以融合,成为指导档案鉴定工作的完备性的思想。

Abstract:

From the perspective of archival appraisal development, this essay combs the appraisal and methodology, and assesses the appraisal ideas in Europe mainland. Content analysis and structural analysis are the main analysis methods in the process of archival appraisal. The former focuses on the content of records, while the latter focuses on the structure of an organization. Respectively based on the principle of pertinence and provenance, the two analysis methods can be connected to apply into archival appraisal practices.

出版日期: 2017-11-28

	服务
	把本文推荐给朋友
	加入引用管理器
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	作者相关文章

引用本文:

宋魏巍. 欧洲大陆国家档案鉴定理论与鉴定方法论发展述评[J]. 档案学研究, 2013, 27(3): 81-86.

Weiwei Song. A Critical Review on Archival Appraisal Theories and Methodologies in European Mainland Countries. Archives Science Study, 2013, 27(3): 81-86.

链接本文:

http://daxyj.idangan.cn/CN/10.16065/j.cnki.issn1002-1620.2013.03.019 或 http://daxyj.idangan.cn/CN/Y2013/V27/I3/81

[1]	Ham,F.Gerald.Selecting and appraising archives and manuscripts[J].Chicago,Ill.:Society of American Arc-hivists,c1993.
[2]	何嘉荪,严晓蓉.“事由原则”应正名为“相关性原则”——兼论文件“来源”概念的实质[J].档案学通讯,2010(6):25-27.
[3]	Booms,Hans.Society and the Formation of a Docume-ntary Heritage:Issues in the Appraisal of Archival Sources[J].Archivaria.1987 (24):69-107.
[4]	黄世喆. 从事由原则到来源原则(之一)[J].档案管理. 2008(2):76.
[5]	Duranti,Luciana.The odyssey of records management part 2:from the middle ages to modern times[J].ARMA Quarterly.1989 (10):5.
[6]	Posner,Ernst.Archives and the public interest:selected essays by Ernst Posner,ed.Ken Munden (Washinton,D.C.:Public Affairs Press)[M],1967:25-26.
[7]	Schellenberg,Theodore.Modern archives:principles and techniques [M].Chicago:University of Chicago Press,1956.
[8]	Bearman,D.A.andLyt- le,R.H.The Power of the Pri-nciple of Provenance[J],Archivaria(1985):21.
[9]	Booms,Hans.Society and the Formation of a Docume-ntary Heritage:Issues in the Appraisal of Archival Sources[J].Archivaria.1987 (24):69-107.
[10]	Posner,Ernst.Archives and the public interest:selected essays by Ernst Posner,ed.Ken Munden (Washinton,D.C.:Public Affairs Press)[M],1967:25-26.
[11]	Schellenberg,Theodore.Modern archives:principles and techniques [M].Chicago:University of Chicago Press,1956.
[12]	Posner,Ernst.Archives and the public interest:selected essays by Ernst Posner,ed.Ken Munden (Washinton,D.C.:Public Affairs Press)[M],1967:25-26.
[13]	Booms,Hans.Society and the Formation of a Documentary Heritage:Issues in the Appraisal of Archival Sources[J].Archivaria.1987 (24):69-107.
[14]	Booms,Hans.Society and the Formation of a Documentary Heritage:Issues in the Appraisal of Archival Sources[J].Archivaria.1987 (24):69-107.
[15]	Schellenberg,Theodore.Modern archives:principles and techniques [M].Chicago:University of Chicago Press,1956.

No related articles found!

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed