档案学史研究的意义、基础与路径探析

doi:10.16065/j.cnki.issn1002-1620.2020.01.001

档案学研究

2020, Vol. 34

Issue (1): 4-18 DOI: 10.16065/j.cnki.issn1002-1620.2020.01.001

基础理论研究

本期目录 | 过刊浏览

档案学史研究的意义、基础与路径探析

闫静

山东大学儒学高等研究院济南 250100; 山东大学历史文化学院济南 250100

Analysis on the Research Significance, Foundation and Approach of Academic History of Archival Science

YAN Jing

Advanced Institute of Confucian Studies,School of History and Culture,Shandong University of China, Jinan 250100

全文:

HTML

PDF(1 KB)
输出: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

摘要: 学术史研究对于构建国家学术创新体系、推动中国特色社会主义文化自信、促进学科的成熟发展具有重要意义。档案学史研究不仅是对档案学术领域、学术人物、学术话语、学术著作、学术传统、学派与师承等“学术成果”的钩沉,更是对这些“学术成果”的学术意义和历史意义予以透视后的历史哲学反思。探讨档案学史研究的意义、基础和路径,不仅可深化档案学史的研究内容,还可丰富学术史理论的研究成果,促使档案学人树立一种恰当的学科史观、构建学史意识。纵观国内外档案学史研究成果,历时性和共时性相结合的学术史研究路径不仅促进了档案学科的学术回归,同时也为学术史研究提供了一种可能。

Abstract：Academic history research is significant to the construction of national academic innovation system and cultural confidence with Chinese characteristics,and the maturity of disciplinary development. Academic history research of archival science is not only the retrospect of the tradition and achievements in archival academic development,but also the historical and philosophical reflections to the academic evolution. The analysis on the research significance,foundation and approach of academic history of archival science can deepen and enrich archival theory,and promote a pertinent academic consciousness of history. Through a general observation of academic history research of archival science,the combination of diachronic and synchronic study not only promotes the academic return of archival science,but also provides a possibility for the research of academic history.

出版日期: 2020-02-10

	服务

	把本文推荐给朋友
	加入引用管理器
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	作者相关文章

引用本文:

闫静. 档案学史研究的意义、基础与路径探析[J]. 档案学研究, 2020, 34(1): 4-18.
YAN Jing. Analysis on the Research Significance, Foundation and Approach of Academic History of Archival Science. Archives Science Study, 2020, 34(1): 4-18.

链接本文:

http://journal12.magtechjournal.com/Jwk_dax/CN/10.16065/j.cnki.issn1002-1620.2020.01.001 或 http://journal12.magtechjournal.com/Jwk_dax/CN/Y2020/V34/I1/4

[1]	叶险明. 中国学术话语体系超越“西方中心主义”的逻辑和方法[J]. 中共中央党校学报,2015(8):69-75.
[2]	梁启超. 清代学术概论[M]//朱维铮.梁启超论清学史二种. 上海:复旦大学出版社,1985:14.
[3]	李醒民. 科学与人文[M]. 北京:中国科学技术出版社,2015:68.
[4]	徐拥军. 档案学的学科自信[J]//赵彦昌.中国档案研究(第四辑).沈阳:辽宁大学出版社, 2017:卷首语.
[5]	注:如西方国家对古文书鉴辨学(Diplomatics)予以重新发现,将其应用于电子时代档案学问题的解决之中,并发展出了Digital Diplomatics.
[6]	Terry Cook.Archival science and postmodernism:new formulations for old concepts[J]. Archival Science, 2001(1):3-24.
[7]	注:源自Luciana Duranti编写的Archival Science,英属哥伦比亚大学(University of British Columbia,UBC)内部资料.
[8]	注:可参见John Roberts的两篇文章,即“Archival Theory:Much Ado about Shelving”(American Archivist,vol.50,winter,1987)和“Archival Theory:Myth or Banality?”(American Archivist,vol.53,Winter,1990).
[9]	Livelton Trevor. Archival Theory,Records,and the Public[M]. London:The Society of American Archivists and the Scarecrow Press,1996:44.
[10]	Terry Eastwood.Nailing a Little Jelly to the Wall of Archival Studies[J]. Archivaria,1993,35(Spring):232-252.
[11]	张岂之. 中国近代史学学术史[M]. 北京:中国社会科学出版社,1996:序言.
[12]	张岂之. 学术史与“学案”体——序《民国学案》[M]//余三定等.当代学术史研究.北京:人民出版社,2009:12-13.
[13]	张立文. 中国学术的界说、演替和创新——兼论中国学术史与思想史、哲学史的分殊[J]. 中国人民大学学报,2004(1):1-9.
[14]	注:转引自戴登云发表于《西南民族大学学报》2015年第8期《中国学术话语体系的创新何以可能?——基于当代中国学术史和思想史的反思》.原文见《二十一世纪》(香港)1994年6月号总第23期“三边互动”栏目.
[15]	傅杰(问),王元化(答). 关于近年的反思答问[J].文艺理论研究,1995(1):2-8.
[16]	罗志田. 探索学术与思想之间的历史[J].四川大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2002(3):86-91.
[17]	吴宝康. 档案学理论与历史初探[M].成都:四川科学技术出版社,1986:154,108.
[18]	《档案学词典》编委会.档案学词典[M].上海:上海辞书出版社,1994:6.
[19]	王续琨,冯欲杰,周心萍.社会科学交叉科学学科辞典[M].大连:大连海事大学出版社,1999:446-447.
[20]	黄世,陈勇,麻新纯等.边疆地区档案学高等教育教学改革理论与实践[M]. 南宁:广西人民出版社,2009:64.
[21]	冯惠玲,张辑哲.档案学概论(第二版)[M].北京:中国人民大学出版社,2006:204.
[22]	王向女. 中国档案学史研究述评[J].档案学研究,2016(5):10-15.
[23]	邱焕星. 学术史合法性的元理论探讨[J].史学理论研究,2014(3):132-137.
[24]	注:档案学大百科全书中将“Archival History”作为单独词条.参见Luciana Duranti,Patricia C.Franks所著Encyclopedia of Archival Science第53-58页.
[25]	Luciana Duranti,Patricia C.Franks. Encyclopedia of Archival Science[M]. Maryland:Rowman & Littlefield,2015:53-58.
[26]	参见S.F.Wise,in opening remarks to his graduate seminar on intellectual history at Carleton University,September 1969.
[27]	Barbara L.Craig.Outward Visions,Inward Glance: Archives History and Professional Identity[J]. Archival Issues,1992,17(2):113-124.
[28]	Terry Cook.What is Past is Prologue:A History of Archival Ideas Since 1898, and the Future Paradigm Shift[J]. Archivaria,1997,43(spring):17-63.
[29]	Richard C.Berner. Archival Theory and Practice in the United States:A Historical Analysis[M]. Seattle and London: The University of Washington Press,1983.
[30]	Verne Harris.Exploring Archives:An Introduction to Archival Ideas and Practice in South Africa[M]. Pretoria: National Archives of South Africa, 2000.
[31]	Nils Rruebach.Archival Science in Germany-Traditions, Developments and Perspective[J]. Archival Science, 2003(3):379-399.
[32]	John Ridener.From Polders to Postmodernism:A Concise History of Archival Theory[M]. US:Litwin Books LLC, 2009.
[33]	William G. Ormsby. The Public Archives of Canada, 1948-1968[J]. Archiviaria,1982-83,15(winter):36-46.
[34]	Terry Cook.An Archival Revolution:W. Kaye Lamb and the Transformation of the Archival Profession[J].Archivaria,2005,60(fall):185-234.
[35]	Borje Justrell.What Is This Thing We Call Archival Science? A report on an international survey[M]. Sweden: Tryckeri AB Smaland Quebecor,1999.
[36]	注:此文为作者在2004年于伦敦大学学院(University College London)的博士论文,后于2009年正式出版(Shepherd,E. Archives and Archivists in 20th Century England [M]. Aldershot,Hants:Ashgate,2009).
[38]	Cox Richard J.Closing an Era: Historical Perspectives on Modern Archives and Records Management[M].Westport,US:Greenwood Press,2000.
[39]	Hermann Rumsch-ttel.The Development of Archival Science as a Scholarly Discipline[J]. Archival Science, 2001(1):143-155.
[40]	梁启超. 中国历史研究法(附补编)[M].上海:东方出版社,1996:316.
[41]	闫静,徐传信.从研究对象到研究视角—— 由吴宝康研究看档案学人研究的路径转换[J].档案学通讯,2017(4):18-23.
[42]	祁进玉. 历史记忆与认同重构:土著民族识别的历史人类学研究[M]. 北京:学苑出版社,2014:51-52.
[43]	姚蒙. 法国当代史学主流—— 从年鉴派到新史学[M].香港:香港三联书店,1988:47-48.

No related articles found!

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed