论档案学史上的“轴心时代”

doi:10.16065/j.cnki.issn1002-1620.2018.06.002

档案学研究

2018, Vol. 32

Issue (6): 12-18 DOI: 10.16065/j.cnki.issn1002-1620.2018.06.002

基础理论研究

本期目录 | 过刊浏览

论档案学史上的“轴心时代”

闫静¹, 徐拥军²

1 山东大学历史文化学院济南 250100
2 中国人民大学信息资源管理学院北京 100872

Research on the Axis Era in the History of Archival Science

Jing YAN¹, Yongjun XU²

1 School of History and Culture, Shandong University of China, Ji’nan 250100;
2 School of Information Resource Management, Renmin Un versity of China Beijing 100872

全文:

HTML

PDF(1011 KB)
输出: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

摘要:

雅斯贝斯提出的“轴心时代”理论界定了人类文明史的发展阶段,轴心时代的辉煌成就是两千多年来人类不竭的思想源泉和精神动力。以“轴心时代”理论审视档案学的发展历程,20世纪五六十年代,那些标志性的、经典的、影响深远的档案学思想和档案学人物对所处时代的档案学发展起到了一种定位与定型之作用,并对后世不同文化传统与发展背景的档案学产生了重要影响,甚至起到了奠基性的作用,这一时期堪称档案学史上的“轴心时代”。“轴心时代”所取得的成果与成就正是档案学后半个世纪乃至未来发展的重要基石,并根植有档案学发展的历史基因,指引着档案学未来发展历程中后续目标的实现。

Abstract：

The Axis Era theory, put forward by Karl Theodor Jaspers, defined the developing phases of the history of human civilization. The brilliant achievements in Axis Era were the sources of thought and spiritual power.Taking the Axis Era theory as inspecting into the history of archival science, it was in the 1950s and 1960s that symbolic, classic and influential archival thoughts and archival figures had impact on the archival development and lay the foundations for the development of archival science under different culture tradition and different background. That era was known as the Axis Era in the history of archival science. Achievements made at that time played an important role in the development of archive science, which guided its future development.

出版日期: 2019-01-09

	服务

	把本文推荐给朋友
	加入引用管理器
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	作者相关文章

引用本文:

闫静, 徐拥军. 论档案学史上的“轴心时代”[J]. 档案学研究, 2018, 32(6): 12-18.
Jing YAN, Yongjun XU. Research on the Axis Era in the History of Archival Science. Archives Science Study, 2018, 32(6): 12-18.

链接本文:

http://journal12.magtechjournal.com/Jwk_dax/CN/10.16065/j.cnki.issn1002-1620.2018.06.002 或 http://journal12.magtechjournal.com/Jwk_dax/CN/Y2018/V32/I6/12

[1]	刘东. 回到轴心时代[J]. 读书1992(11):95-99.
[2]	注:1949年出版的为德文版Vom Ursprungand Ziel der Geschichte,慕尼黑出版社出版;1953年该书被译为英文The Originand Goal of History,耶鲁大学出版社出版.
[3]	注:主要内容见[德]卡尔·雅斯贝斯著,魏楚雄、俞新天译. 历史的起源与目标[M]. 北京:华夏出版社,1989.
[4]	胡适. 先秦名学史[M]. 上海:学林出版社,1983:11.
[5]	注:尽管当时胡适并未明确提出“轴心时代”这一概念.
[6]	注:参见《陈独秀著作选》《胡适口述自传》《周作人生活之艺术》等著作内容.
[7]	John Ridener.From Polders to Postmodernism: A Concise History of Archival Theory[M]. US: Litwin Books LLC,2009.
[8]	Maclean的一大贡献是从澳大利亚的角度撰写文章回忆希拉里·詹金逊爵士.具体参见:Ian Maclean. An Analysis of Jenkinson’s‘Manual of Archive Administration’in the light of Australian Experience[C]//A.E.J.Hollander,ed.Essays in memory of Sir Hilary Jenkinson,London: Society of Archivists,1962: 128-152.
[9]	比较典型的是,詹金逊《档案管理手册》中的原则与方法于20世纪40年代后期开始就被用于澳大利亚联邦档案馆档案的登记、编目与著录工作.
[10]	两篇论文分别为:The arrangement of private papers[J]. Archives and Manuscripts,1957,1(4):1-20. The description of private papers[J]. Archives and Manuscripts,1958,1(5):1-19.
[11]	参考Peter Biskup,Kathryn Dan,Colleen McEwen. Debates and Discourses:Selected Australian Writings on Archival Theory 1951—1990[M]. Canberra:Australian Society of Archivists,1995.
[12]	尤其是20世纪七八十年代开始,欧美档案学界对档案与文件管理的理论和方法产生了持续且高涨的兴趣.从杰拉德·汉姆(F.Gerald Ham)于1975年对实证主义理论的质疑开始,《美国档案工作者》(American Archivist)和加拿大《档案》(Archiviaria)陆续刊登了系列论文探讨档案的理论与方法问题,其代表人物有弗兰克·博克(Frank G.Burke,1981)、金博尔(Kimball,1985)、罗伯特(J.W.Roberts,1987)、特里·伊斯伍德(Terry Eastwood,1994)、纳史密斯(Nesmith,2002)、特里·库克(Terry Cook,2013)等.参见Introduction -by Caroline Brown. XI-XXIII, Archives and Recordkeeping: Theory into Practice, Edited by Caroline Brown, Published by Facet Publishing, London, 2014;Burke,F.G., The Future of Archival Theory in the United States, American Archivist,1981,44(1):40-46.;Kimball,G.D.,The Burke-Cappon Debate: some further criticisms and considerations for archival theory, American Archivist, 1985,48(4): 396-376.;Roberts,J.W., Much Ado about Shelving, American Archivist, 1987,50(1): 66-74.;Eastwood,T., What Is Archival Theory and Why Is It Important? Archivaria,1994(37): 122-130.;Nesmith,T., Seeing Archives:Postmodernism and the changing intellectual place of archives, American Archivist, 2002,65(1):24-41.;Cook,T., Evidence,Memory,Identity and Community:four shifting archival paradigms,Archival Science,2013,13(2-3):95-120.
[13]	Richard J.Cox. Closing an Era: Historical Perspectives on Modern Archives and Records Management[M]. London: Greenwood Press,2000.Chapter 1.
[14]	Frank B.Evans. Archivists and Records Managers: Variations on a Theme[J]. American Archivists, 1967(1):48.
[15]	William G. Ormsby. The Public Archives of Canada, 1948—1968[J]. Archiviaria 1982—1983(15):36-46.该文阐述了Lamb对加拿大档案事业及档案学术发展所作出的贡献.
[16]	Terry Cook.An Archival Revolution: W.Kaye Lamb and the Transformation of the Archival Profession[J].Archivaria2005(60):185-234.
[18]	参见Luciana Duranti对Archival Science的解释,英属哥伦比亚大学(University of British Columbia,UBC)内部文献.
[19]	Fernanda Ribeiro.Archival Science and Changes in the Paradigm[J].Archival Science, 2001(1):295-310.
[20]	参见R.C.Sharman. Causation in Historical Study[C]// Proceedings of the 15th Biennial Conference of the Library Association of Australia. Australia: Sydney, 1971:369-381.
[21]	Terry Cook,What is Past is Prologue: A History of Archival Ideas Since1898, and the Future Paradigm Shift[J]. Archivaria,1997(43):17-63.
[22]	谭必勇. 《现代档案:原则与技术》导读[EB/OL].[2018-05-16].
[23]	[美]华勒斯坦. 超越年鉴学派?[M]//[美]华勒斯坦等著,刘健芝等编译. 学科·知识·权力. 北京:生活·读书·新知三联书店,1999:213-225.
[24]	[德]卡尔·雅斯贝斯著,魏楚雄、俞新天译. 历史的起源与目标[M]. 北京:华夏出版社,1989:161.

No related articles found!

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed