常德日本细菌战档案公开——社群范式下档案如何推动社会公正与和解进程

doi:10.16065/j.cnki.issn1002-1620.2016.03.010

档案学研究

2016, Vol. 30

Issue (3): 54-58 DOI: 10.16065/j.cnki.issn1002-1620.2016.03.010

档案资源开发

本期目录 | 过刊浏览

常德日本细菌战档案公开——社群范式下档案如何推动社会公正与和解进程

谭雪

上海大学图书情报档案系上海 200444

How Can Archives Promote A Social Justice and Reconciliation Process?

Xue TAN

Department of Library, Information and Archives, Shanghai University, Shanghai, 200444

全文:

HTML

PDF(403 KB)
输出: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

摘要:

本文基于案例和西方学者研究成果,提出社群范式下档案对社会公正与和解进程的作用模式——在“和平”的前提下,利用档案的凭证价值补充、纠正历史,揭示过去的不公正行为,通过抗议、协商要求确定责任并获得补偿,档案从“权力的工具”变为“权利的工具”实现其权利的解放,而社会公正也得以维护,最终实现社会和解。

关键词 ：社群档案, 社会公正, 细菌战档案

Abstract：

Based on some cases and research achievements of Western scholars, the paper suggests a module to explain how archives act in a social justice process. Under the precondition of peace, archives can be used to reveal past injustice and complement history because of their voucher value. And then the sufferers will claim to identify the accountability and ask for compensation. Thus, “the tools of power” becomes “the tools of rights”, which could be called the release of archival rights. At the same time, social justice can be maintained and ultimately social reconciliation can be realized.

Key words： community archives social justice archives of bacterioloigic warfare

出版日期: 2017-11-15

	服务

	把本文推荐给朋友
	加入引用管理器
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	作者相关文章
	谭雪

引用本文:

谭雪. 常德日本细菌战档案公开——社群范式下档案如何推动社会公正与和解进程[J]. 档案学研究, 2016, 30(3): 54-58.
Xue TAN. How Can Archives Promote A Social Justice and Reconciliation Process?. Archives Science Study, 2016, 30(3): 54-58.

链接本文:

http://daxyj.idangan.cn/CN/10.16065/j.cnki.issn1002-1620.2016.03.010 或 http://daxyj.idangan.cn/CN/Y2016/V30/I3/54

[1]	彭斌. 社会和解何以可能?——以恢复性正义为视角的分析[J].学术交流,2012(9):5-9. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-8284.2012.09.001
[2]	Terry Cook.Evidence, memory, identity, and community: four shifting archival paradigms[J]. Archival Science, 2013(13):95-120. doi: 10.1007/s10502-012-9180-7
[3]	付苑. 档案与社会正义:国外档案伦理研究的新进展[J].档案学通讯,2014(4):4-9.
[4]	Irum Shiekh.Government Spy or a Terrorist?Dilemmas of a Post-9/11 Academic Researcher[J]. Amerasia Journal, 2007(3):26-40. doi: 10.17953/amer.33.3.35q84232781n811t
[5]	Sue McKemmish, Shannon Faulkhead, Lynette Russell. Distrust in the archive: reconciling records[J]. Archival Science, 2011(11):211-239. doi: 10.1007/s10502-011-9153-2
[6]	安德鲁·瑞格比.暴力之后的正义与和解[M]. 刘北成译.上海: 译林出版社,2004.
[7]	Wendy M. Duff, Andrew Flinn.Social justice impact of archives:a preliminary investigation[J]. Archival Science,2013,13(4):317-348. doi: 10.1007/s10502-012-9198-x
[8]	彭斌. 社会和解何以可能?——以恢复性正义为视角的分析[J].学术交流,2012(9):5-9. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-8284.2012.09.001
[9]	Andrew Flinn, Mary Stevens, Elizabeth Shepherd.Whose memories, whose archives? Independent community archives, autonomy and the mainstream[J]. Archival Science, 2009(9):71-86.
[10]	Elizabeth Kennedy.Telling Tales:Oral history and the construction of Pre-Stonewall lesbian history[J]. Radical History Review, 1995(62):58-79. doi: 10.1215/01636545-1995-62-59
[11]	Wendy M. Duff, Andrew Flinn.Social justice impact of archives:a preliminary investigation[J]. Archival Science,2013,13(4):317-348. doi: 10.1007/s10502-012-9198-x
[12]	Horton S, Spence J. Scoping the economic and social impact of archives [J/OL]. York-shire: Yorkshire Museums, Libraries and Archives Council,2006-03 [2013-10-15].
[13]	彭斌. 社会和解何以可能?——以恢复性正义为视角的分析[J].学术交流,2012(9):5-9. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-8284.2012.09.001

No related articles found!

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed