Please wait a minute...
档案学研究  2016, Vol. 30 Issue (1): 80-85    DOI: 10.16065/j.cnki.issn1002-1620.2016.01.013
  档案资源开发 本期目录 | 过刊浏览 |
信息自决权理论下的档案隐私保护路径探析
闫静
中国人民大学信息资源管理学院 北京 100872
Methods of Archives Privacy Protection in the Information Self-Determination Theory
Jing YAN
School of Information Resource Management, Renmin University of China, Beijing, 100872
全文: HTML    PDF(903 KB)  
输出: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      
摘要: 

在档案工作中,隐私档案类别的多样性、范围的广泛性,加之计算机网络技术的应用、Web2.0时代下社交媒体带来的挑战、档案信息资源的增值开发等新趋势均给档案隐私保护增加了难度。信息自决权理论作为一种新型的隐私权保护理论,其将隐私问题予以明确的立法保障、做好不同权益方权责关系的协调、考虑隐私保护与限制的平衡、确立资料保护机构的职能与责任等理论内涵对档案隐私保护深具指导意义。笔者认为,“一个前提、两对关系、三方主体、四种保障”不失为信息自决权理论下档案隐私保护的具体路径。

关键词 信息自决权隐私保护档案隐私    
Abstract

In archivals work, privacy protection becomes more and more difficult because of the multiple types and extensive scope of privacy archives, the application of computer network technology, social media and value-added exploitation of archival information resource. As a new theory, Information self-determination demands that privacy protection laws and policies should be made definite, the interests of various parties be coordinated, the relationship between privacy protection and restriction be considered, and the functions of specialized agencies be established. The writer holds that “a premise, two relationships, three subjects and four guarantees” are the directions of archives privacy protection in the information self-determination theory.

Key wordsinformation self-determination    privacy protection    archives privacy
出版日期: 2017-11-15
引用本文:

闫静. 信息自决权理论下的档案隐私保护路径探析[J]. 档案学研究, 2016, 30(1): 80-85.
Jing YAN. Methods of Archives Privacy Protection in the Information Self-Determination Theory. Archives Science Study, 2016, 30(1): 80-85.

链接本文:

http://daxyj.idangan.cn/CN/10.16065/j.cnki.issn1002-1620.2016.01.013      或      http://daxyj.idangan.cn/CN/Y2016/V30/I1/80

[1] Samuel Warren,Louis Brandeis.The Right to Privacy[J].Harvard Law Review,1890(193).
[2] E.L.Godkin. The Right of the Citizen, IV-To His Own Reputation[J].Scribner’s Manazine, 1890,July-Dec:65.
[3] U.S.Executive Office of the President, Office of Science and Technology. Privacy and Behavioral Research [R]. G.P.O,Washington D.C.,1967.
[4] Goethe Institut. The Right to Self-Determination over Personal Data on Trial[EB/OL].[2014-6-24]. .
[5] Alan F.Westin. Privacy and Freedom[M]. New York: The Bodley Head Ltd,1970.4
[6] 谢永志著. 个人数据保护立法研究[M].北京:人民法院出版社,2013.7:99.
[7] Eurofound. Right of Self-Determination over Personal Data.[EB/OL].[2014-6-24]..
[8] Dataprotecton.eu. Data Protection law-An Introduction [EB/OL].[2014-6-24]..
[9] 郭瑜. 个人数据保护法研究[M].北京:北京大学出版社,2012:29.
[10] 张兆忠. 档案开放与保护公民隐私[J].北京档案,2000(2):28-29..
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-1051.2000.02.018
[11] 马克思、恩格斯全集第18卷(中文版)[Z]:591.
[12] 齐爱民. 个人信息开发利用与人格权保护之平衡——论我国个人信息保护法的宗旨[J].社会科学家,2007(3):7-10.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-3240.2007.02.002
[13] 孔令杰. 个人资料隐私的法律保护[M].武汉:武汉大学出版社,2009:235.
[14] 张凤合. 公共政策的价值要义及其实现路径基于当下我国的社会转型视角[M].北京:中国社会科学出版社,2012:193-195.
[15] Eric Ketelaar.The Right to Know, the Right to Forget Personal Information in Public Archives[J].Archives and Manuscripts,1995,23(1):8-17.
No related articles found!