中美档案学形成阶段与发展因素的相通性分析

doi:10.16065/j.cnki.issn1002-1620.2016.01.002

档案学研究

2016, Vol. 30

Issue (1): 11-18 DOI: 10.16065/j.cnki.issn1002-1620.2016.01.002

基础理论研究

本期目录 | 过刊浏览

中美档案学形成阶段与发展因素的相通性分析

曹玉

中国人民大学信息资源管理学院北京 100872

Analysis on Interlinked Nature of the Formation Stages and Development Factors of Archival Study between China and America

Yu CAO

School of Information Resource Management, Renmin University of China, Beijing, 100872

全文:

HTML

PDF(523 KB)
输出: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

摘要:

档案教育、档案专著与期刊论文是档案学产生与发展的重要标志,中、美两国档案学的发展历程均属于起步晚、发展快的代表性国家。历经萌芽期、形成期后逐步走向成熟,促进档案学生成与发展的因素不仅来自外界的刺激,最主要的因素源于学科内部。虽然不同国家、不同阶段有着不同的特点,从中挖掘其本质上的通性因素,更能够反映一门学科的国际发展趋势及面临的挑战。

关键词 ：中国档案学, 美国档案学, 发展因素, 相通性

Abstract：

Archival education, archival monographs and journal articles are important symbols of the emergence and development of archival study. The development process of archival study both in China and America are representative countries which start late but develop fast. After a time of gestation and formative era and gradually matured, the stimulate factors that promote the formation and development of archival study are not only from external, but also from internal. Although different countries have different characteristics in different period, aside sharp contract, to dig the commonness factors in essential could reflect international trends and the challenges that our discipline faces.

Key words： Chinese archival science American archival science development factors interlinked nature

出版日期: 2017-11-15

	服务

	把本文推荐给朋友
	加入引用管理器
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	作者相关文章
	曹玉

引用本文:

曹玉. 中美档案学形成阶段与发展因素的相通性分析[J]. 档案学研究, 2016, 30(1): 11-18.
Yu CAO. Analysis on Interlinked Nature of the Formation Stages and Development Factors of Archival Study between China and America. Archives Science Study, 2016, 30(1): 11-18.

链接本文:

http://daxyj.idangan.cn/CN/10.16065/j.cnki.issn1002-1620.2016.01.002 或 http://daxyj.idangan.cn/CN/Y2016/V30/I1/11

表1 中、美两国学者对档案学发展的时期划分

[1]	李财富. 中国档案学史论[M].合肥:安徽大学出版社,2005.
[2]	Richard J.Cox. American Archival History: Its Development,Needs,and Opportunities[J].American Archivist,1983,46(1):31-41 doi: 10.17723/aarc.46.1.n43kl32721m250g1
[3]	Richard J.Cox. American Archival Literature: Expanding Horizons and Continuing Needs, 1901-1987[J]. American Archivist,1987,50:306-323. doi: 10.2307/4050459
[4]	Richard J. Cox,Ronald L.Larsen. iSchools and Archival Studies[J].Archival Science,2008(8):307-326.
[5]	李财富. 中国档案学史论[M].合肥:安徽大学出版社,2005.
[6]	2015年USNews美国大学档案管理学专业研究生排名：西蒙斯学院、密歇根大学安娜堡分校、北卡罗来纳大学教堂山分校、得克萨斯大学奥斯汀分校、加州大学洛杉矶分校、匹兹堡大学、马里兰大学帕克分校、伊利诺伊大学香槟分校、威斯康星密沃尔基分校、威斯康星麦迪逊分校、普瑞特学院、德雷赛尔大学。
[7]	毛泽东. 毛泽东选集第一卷(第2版)[M].北京:人民出版社,1996.
[8]	Richard J. Cox, Charles Dollar, Rebecca Hirsch,Peter J. Wosh. Founding Brothers： Leland, Buck, and Cappon and the Formation of the Archives Profession[J]. The American Archivist,2011/Swpplement,74:1-27. doi: 10.17723/aarc.74.suppl-1.7643350434n7p363
[9]	李刚. 美国档案学史上的双子星座——兼论早期档案学家的专业认同[J]. 档案学通讯,2010(5):99-102.
[10]	胡鸿杰. 化腐朽为神奇——中国档案学评析[M].上海:上海世界图书出版公司,2010.
[11]	Richard J. Cox, Ronald L. Larsen. iSchools and Archival Studies[J]. Archival Science, 2008(8):307-326.
[12]	Richard J. Cox. Are there really new directions and innovations in archival education?[J]. Archival Science, 2006(6)247-261. doi: 10.1007/s10502-006-9032-4
[13]	马仁杰,程亚萍. 论档案学发展的时代特点——以国际档案大会为中心考察[J].北京档案,2014(3):68-70.
[14]	Richard J. Cox, Elizabeth Yakel, David Wallace, Jeannette A. Bastian and Jennifer Marshall. Archival Education in North American Library and Information Science Schools[J]. The Library Quarterly, 2001,71(2): 141-194. doi: 10.1086/603260
[15]	Richard J. Cox. Are there really new directions and innovations in archival education?[J]. Archival Science, 2006(6):247-261. doi: 10.1007/s10502-006-9032-4
[16]	Richard J. Cox, Elizabeth Yakel, David Wallace, Jeannette A. Bastian and Jennifer Marshall. Archival Education in North American Library and Information Science Schools[J]. The Library Quarterly,2001,71(2): 141-194. doi: 10.1086/603260
[17]	Richard J. Cox. Are there really new directions and innovations in archival education?[J]. Archival Science,2006(6):247-261. doi: 10.1007/s10502-006-9032-4
[18]	Frank Burke.The Future Course of Archival Theory in the United States[J]. American Archivist,1981,44: 42. doi: 10.17723/aarc.44.1.485380l307551286
[19]	陈永生. 档案学论衡[M].北京:中国档案出版社,1994.
[20]	Society of American Archivists(SAA,美国档案工作者协会)
[21]	中国档案学术网(中国档案学会主办)

[1]	孙大东. 中国档案学范式尚未形成——基于批判性视域的考量[J]. 档案学研究, 2016, 30(5): 16-20.

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed