政府信息公共获取绩效评估主体多元化研究

doi:10.16065/j.cnki.issn1002-1620.2011.04.005

档案学研究

2011, Vol. 25

Issue (4): 57-60 DOI: 10.16065/j.cnki.issn1002-1620.2011.04.005

政府信息公共获取绩效评估主体多元化研究

王协舟, 彭海艳

湘潭大学公共管理学院湖南湘潭 411105

Research on the subject of Evaluation of Government Performance of Public Access to Government Information

Xiezhou Wang, Haiyan Peng

School of Public Management of Xiangtan University, Xiangtan, Hunan, 411105

全文: PDF(172 KB) HTML

摘要：

为了确保政府信息资源公共获取绩效评估的科学性和客观性,需要构建多元化的评估主体。构建多元化的评估主体,需要坚持和遵循三个基本原则,即立足现实、兼顾内外、科学配比。政府信息资源公共获取绩效评估主体既包括同体评估主体,又包括异体评估主体。

Abstract:

In order to ensure scientific and objective of the evaluation of government performance of public access to government information,We need to build a wide range of evaluation subjects. Diversified assessment of the main building, we need to adhere to and follow three basic principles, namely, based on reality, both inside and outside the scientific ratio. The subject of the evaluation of government performance of public access to government information includes the performance evaluation of the main body of the main assessment, and the assessment of the main variant.

出版日期: 2017-11-28

	服务
	把本文推荐给朋友
	加入引用管理器
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	作者相关文章

引用本文:

王协舟, 彭海艳. 政府信息公共获取绩效评估主体多元化研究[J]. 档案学研究, 2011, 25(4): 57-60.

Xiezhou Wang, Haiyan Peng. Research on the subject of Evaluation of Government Performance of Public Access to Government Information. Archives Science Study, 2011, 25(4): 57-60.

链接本文:

http://daxyj.idangan.cn/CN/10.16065/j.cnki.issn1002-1620.2011.04.005 或 http://daxyj.idangan.cn/CN/Y2011/V25/I4/57

[1]	吴鹏,严凤雅.政府绩效评估相关主体间利益整合机制研究[J].甘肃理论学刊,2010(1):121-124.
[2]	彭国甫,盛明科.政府绩效评估不同主体间的利益差异及其整合[J].学习与探索,2008(5):82-86.
[3]	卓越.公共部门绩效评估的主体建构[J]. 中国行政管理,2004(5):17-20.
[4]	吴光森,尹艳红.政府绩效评估多元主体分析[J].江汉论坛,2006(8):91-93.

No related articles found!

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed