从严格意义上说,现行文件确实也是一种真实的历史记录,但我们必须清楚,现行文件作为一种真实的历史记录与半现行文件和非现行文件作为一种真实的历史记录是有本质区别的,即使如拉丁语系国家那样把现行文件认作档案也是如此,现行文件的超前归档并不意味着文件运动出现了跳跃,文件仍处于现行期,我们最好还是抛弃“现行文件也是真实的历史记录”的观念,否则就会出现许多令人难以接受的结论。
Exactly, active records are indeed a kind of real history too, but we must point out there are differences between a real history of active records and a real history of semi-active records and non-active records, even if active records are regarded as archives like Latin-spoken countries. Super-filing of active records does not means that records motion comes out skipping, records is still in an active stage, we should give up the opinion of active records to be real history also, or else a lot of unacceptable results will take place.
浙江杭州市,中国计量学院外国语学院档案室,邮编:310018 电话:86875604
吴品才. 对“现行文件也是真实的历史记录”的思辨——兼论文件运动跳跃的可能性[J]. 档案学研究, 2008, 22(2): 45-48.
http://daxyj.idangan.cn/CN/Y2008/V22/I2/45
Cited