|
|
Experiments on the configuration of serpentine slag soil and its improved planting substrate in alpine mining area: A case study of the West Copper Mine in Qinghai |
KONG Lingjian1, ZHANG Lin1, WANG Yingnan1, ZHANG Ming2, SHI Xingping2, HUANG Zhanbin1 |
1. School of Chemical and Environmental Engineering, China University of Mining and Technology(Beijing), 100083, Beijing, China; 2. Qinghai West Copper Industry Co., Ltd., 814000, Guoluo, Qinghai, China |
|
|
Abstract [Background] This study explores the impact of mineral resource development on regional soil quality, addressing challenges like soil structure damage and fertility decline in alpine mining areas. The proposed solution involves combining serpentine residue soil with raw soil from early mine construction, incorporating local materials like sheep manure, TG amendment, and water retaining agent. The goal is to enhance soil structure and nutrient conditions, establishing a suitable soil matrix for vegetation recovery. This approach aims to improve soil water and nutrient retention in mining areas, supporting soil restoration in high-altitude regions like Qinghai West Copper Mine [Methods] In this study, samples representing storage raw soil and serpentine residue soil were collected from platforms 4290 and 4138 of Qinghai West Copper Mine using a three-mixed-one sampling method. The experiments included substrate formulation tests, potting tests, and field plot planting substrate amendment tests to assess their effects on soil properties and growth of one and six plant species. Physical and chemical indicators such as soil bulk weight, pH, porosity, EC, and nutrient content were measured using standard methods. Microsoft Excel and SPSS 26 were used to analyze the experimental data for statistics and to determine the significance of differences. [Results] 1) Different ratios of serpentine residue soil and raw soil significantly affected the physicochemical properties of the substrate. When the ratio of serpentine residue soil to raw soil was 6 颐 4, the formulated soil bulk density, pH, and electrical conductivity decreased by 2.20%, 7.95%, and 19.88%, respectively, compared to the pure serpentine residue soil control (CK). Meanwhile, soil salt, soil capillary porosity, soil field water-holding capacity, available phosphorus, available potassium, total nitrogen, and hydrolyzable nitrogen contents increased significantly by 15.12%, 7.02%, 75.23%, 328.88%, 117.65%, and 32.38%, respectively, meeting the basic requirements of a greening substrate. 2) Pot planting results indicated that forage grasses like Elymus dahuricus showed increased emergence when planted alone or mixed with six grass seeds at a 6 颐 4 ratio of serpentine residue soil to raw soil, with a 10.34% and 25% increase, respectively. Additionally, the height, aboveground biomass, and belowground biomass of E. dahuricus increased by 7.25%, 87.00%, and 246.95% compared to the control CK. 3) The field plot planting test indicated that with a formulation ratio of 6颐 4 for serpentine residue soil to raw soil, and the addition of 1 kg / m2 TG amendment, 12 g / m2 KM 3005 water retaining agent, and 3.12 kg / m2 of goat slate manure, the seedling height and biomass in the gradient test of goat slate manure and TG amendment increased by 38.30% and 200.43%, and 21.43% and 358.02%, respectively, compared to the control. These findings have been applied in an engineering demonstration. [Conclusions] The study concludes that a 6颐 4 mix of serpentinite slag soil and local raw soil improves physicochemical properties in high-altitude mining areas. This ratio enhances soil structure, lowers pH and conductivity, and increases pore density and water retention. Enriched with nutrients, it supports better grass growth. Pot experiments confirm suitability for seedling emergence and overall growth. Field trials with serpentinite slag soil, raw soil, sheep manure, TG amendment, and KM 3005 water retaining agent promote superior ecological restoration in soil-deficient, high-altitude mining areas.
|
Received: 08 September 2023
|
|
|
|
|
[1] |
闫慧敏,杜文鹏,封志明,等.自然资源资产负债的界定及其核算思路[J].资源科学, 2018, 40(5):888. YAN Huimin, DU Wenpeng, FENG Zhiming, et al. The definition and accounting approaches towards natural resource liabilities[J]. Resources Science, 2018,40(5):888.
|
[2] |
侯李云,曾希柏,张杨珠.客土改良技术及其在砷污染土壤修复中的应用展望[J].中国生态农业学报, 2015, 23(1):20. HOU Liyun, ZENG Xibai, ZHANG Yangzhu. Application and outlook of alien earth soil-improving technology in arsenic-contaminated soil remediation[J]. Chinese Journal of Eco-Agriculture, 2015,23(1):20.
|
[3] |
张琳,陆兆华,唐思易,等.露天煤矿排土场边坡植被组成特征及其群落稳定性评价[J].生态学报, 2021, 41(14):5764. ZHANG Lin, LU Zhaohua, TANG Siyi, et al. Slope vegetation characteristics and community stability at different restoration years of open-pit coal mine waste dump[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2021,41(14):5764.
|
[4] |
FERNANDEZ-CALIANI J C, GIRALDEZ M, WAKEN W H, et al. Soil quality changes in an Iberian pyrite mine site 15 years after land reclamation[J]. Catena, 2021, 206:105538.
|
[5] |
VENSON G R, MARENZI R C, ALMEIDA T C, et al. Restoration of areas degraded by alluvial sand mining:use of soil microbiological activity and plant biomass growth to assess evolution of restored riparian vegetation[J]. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 2017, 189(3):120.
|
[6] |
李永红,李希来,唐俊伟,等.青海木里高寒矿区生态修复"七步法"种草技术研究[J].中国煤炭地质, 2021, 33(7):57. LI Yonghong, LI Xilai, TANG Junwei, et al. Study on"Seven-Step"grass planting technology for ecological rehabilitation of frigid zone Muri mining area in Qinghai[J]. Coal Geology of China, 2021,33(7):57.
|
[7] |
乔千洛,杨文权,赵帅,等.种草基质对木里矿区植被恢复效果的影响[J].草业科学, 2022, 39(9):1782. QIAO Qianluo, YANG Wenquan, ZHAO Shuai, et al. Effects of grass planting substrate on vegetation restoration in the Muli mining area[J]. Pratacultural Science, 2022,39(9):1782.
|
[8] |
李毅,梁嘉平,王小芳,等.改善土壤理化性质和作物出苗率的最佳生物质炭施用量[J].土壤学报,2024, 61(1):64. LI Yi,LIANG Jiaping,WANG Xiaofang,et al. The most appropriate biochar application rate for improving soil physicochemical properties and crop germination rates[J]. Acta Pedologica Sinica,2024,61(1):64.
|
[9] |
李昉泽,毋振庆,门姝慧,等.腐植酸复合材料对生土熟化及黑麦草生长的效应研究[J].腐植酸, 2019(2):19. LI Fangze, WU Zhenqing, MEN Shuhui, et al. Effects research of compound materials with humic acid on immature soil maturity and growth of ryegrass[J]. Humic Acid, 2019(2):19.
|
[10] |
马妍,刘振海,刘陆涵,等.三种环境材料复合对土壤水肥保持同步增效的影响[J].农业环境科学学报, 2017, 36(12):2471. MA Yan, LIU Zhenhai, LIU Luhan, et al. Study of composites of three kinds of environmental materials on the synergism of soil moisture conservation and nitrogen-phosphorus fertilizer efficiency[J]. Journal of Agro-Environment Science, 2017,36(12):2471.
|
[11] |
彭祥玉,刘文刚,王本英,等.蛇纹石综合利用现状与展望[J].矿产保护与利用, 2019, 39(4):99. PENG Xiangyu, LIU Wengang, WANG Benying, et al. Current situation and prospect of comprehensive utilization of serpentine[J]. Conservation and Utilization of Mineral Resources, 2019,39(4):99.
|
[12] |
曹春艳.蛇纹石对重金属吸附机制及对土壤重金属赋存形态影响[D].沈阳:沈阳农业大学,2018:30. CAO Chunyan. Adsorption mechanism of heavy metals on serpentine and its effects on heavy metals formations in contaminated soil[D]. Shenyang:Shenyang Agricultural University,2018:30
|
[13] |
杨帆,徐洋,崔勇,等.近30年中国农田耕层土壤有机质含量变化[J].土壤学报, 2017, 54(5):1047. YANG Fan, XU Yang, CUI Yong, et al. Variation of soil organic matter content in croplands of China over the last three decades[J]. Acta Pedologica Sinica, 2017, 54(5):1047.
|
[14] |
刘兰英,涂杰峰,黄薇,等.福建闽西矿区周边土壤Cd、Pb、Cr含量及风险评价[J].福建农业学报, 2017, 32(1):68. LIU Lanying, TU Jiefeng, HUANG Wei, et al. Monitoring and risk assessment on heavy metals in soil at a mining area in Fujian[J]. Fujian Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 2017,32(1):68.
|
[15] |
FERNANDEZ A L, SHEAFFER C C, WYSE D L, et al. Associations between soil bacterial community structure and nutrient cycling functions in long-term organic farm soils following cover crop and organic fertilizer amendment[J]. Science of the Total Environment, 2016,566/567:949.
|
[16] |
朱先波,潘亮,王华玲,等.十堰猕猴桃果园生草生态效应的分析[J].农业资源与环境学报, 2020, 37(3):381. ZHU Xianbo, PAN Liang, WANG Hualing, et al. Analysis of the ecological effects of grass-growing in kiwifruit orchards in Shiyan, China[J]. Journal of Agricultural Resources and Environment, 2020,37(3):381.
|
|
|
|