重庆四面山不同林分土壤抗蚀抗冲特征

doi:10.16843/j.sswc.2022211

Abstract
Figure/Table
References
Related Citation (10)

Download: PDF (968 KB) HTML (1 KB)
Export: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

Abstract [Background] The erosion resistance of soils can resist the damage and transport of soils by external forces. The Simian Mountains of Chongqing are rich in vegetation resources, and it is essential to study the soil erosion and anti-scouring resistance of different plantations. [Methods] In order to investigate the soil anti-erosion and anti-scouring resistance characteristics of different plantations in the Simian Mountains of Chongqing, soil anti-erosion indices (S) were calculated using waterlogging experience and anti-scouring coefficients (C) were calculated using scouring tests. Therefore, the soil erosion resistance characteristics of four forest types (coniferous forests, broadleave forests, coniferous broadleaf mixed forests, and Phydlostachy pubescens forests), with a total of nine different plant compositions, were studied in the Simian Mountains. [Results] 1) The broadleaf forest had the highest resistance index, which meant that it had the best resistance to soil erosion. The lowest resistance index was found in the P. pubescens forests, on the other hand. In the interim, soil anti-erodibility declined as soil depth increased. Natural coniferious broadleaf mixed forests' upper and bottom strata showed the biggest difference in the anti-erosion index, with a difference of up to 1.92 times. 2) The second polynomial function provided a good fit for the association between the anti-erosion index and the duration of flooding in various plantations (R²>0.95). The anti-erodibility declined as flooding time increased in all plantations. 3) The experimental results showed that the deeper the soil layer, the greater the anti-scouring coefficients and the greater anti-scouring performance of the soil. According to the data, the upper layer of the slope soil had an anti-scouring coefficient that was 1.05 to 5.79 times higher than the lower layer. Based on a comparison of the anti-scouring coefficients, broadleaf forests were found to be more resistant to impact than other forest plantations. 4) Through this experiment, soil anti-erosion indices and anti-scouring resistance coefficients were related to root features. With a significant positive correlation to the anti-erosion index (P <0.05) and a significantly negative correlation to the anti-scouoring resistance coefficient (P<0.05), respectively, were the total root length and root length density of roots with a diameter of ≤ 1 mm and >1-3 mm. However, the anti-erosion index and anti-scouring coefficient had a significantly negative correlation with total root weight and root weight density (P<0.05). [Conclusions] The soil anti-erosion and anti-scouing characteristics of different plantations, such as coniferous forests, broadleaf forests, coniferous and broadleaf mixed forests, and P. pubescens forests, were studied through waterlogging and scouring tests. The correlation between root systems and soil anti-erosian and anti-scourring resistance were analyzed. The experience was conducive to providing data support for regional soil erosion and providing a theoretical basis for the deployment of soil and water conservation measures and the selection of reasonable vegetation restoration patterns and configurations in order to prevent soil erosion in the Simian Mountains of Chongqing.

Key words： anti-erosion index anti-scouring coefficient forest stand type Simian Mountains of Chongqing

Received: 31 October 2022

PACS:

S157.1

	Service

	E-mail this article
	Add to my bookshelf
	Add to citation manager
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	Articles by authors
	CHENG Jinhua
	SHEN Ziya

Cite this article:

CHENG Jinhua,SHEN Ziya. Anti-erodibility and anti-scourability of different plantations in Simian Mountains of Chongqing[J]. SSWC, 2024, 22(1): 52-62.

URL:

http://journal12.magtechjournal.com/Jweb_stbc/EN/10.16843/j.sswc.2022211 OR http://journal12.magtechjournal.com/Jweb_stbc/EN/Y2024/V22/I1/52

[1]	朱显谟. 我国十年来水土保持工作的成就[J]. 土壤,1959(10):7. ZHU Xianmo. China's achievements in soil and water conservation over the past decade[J]. Soils,1959(10):7.
[2]	杨智, 兰雪, 戴全厚, 等. 黔中地区不同岩性土壤抗冲抗蚀性研究进展[J]. 水土保持研究,2010,17(4):6. YANG Zhi, LAN Xue, DAI Quanhou, et al.Anti-erodibility and anti-scourability of different lithological soils in the area of central Guizhou province[J]. Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2010,17(4):6.
[3]	资如毅, 赵龙山, 钱晓鹤, 等. 喀斯特高原山地土壤抗冲性与土壤物理性质的关系[J]. 水土保持学报,2022,36(3):23. ZI Ruyi, ZHAO Longshan, QIAN Xiaohe, et al. Relationship between soil anti-scourability and soil physical properties in Karst Mountain areas[J]. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation,2022,36(3):23.
[4]	郭明明, 王文龙, 康宏亮, 等. 黄土高塬沟壑区植被自然恢复年限对坡面土壤抗冲性的影响[J]. 农业工程学报,2018,34(22):138. GUO Mingming, WANG Wenlong, KANG Hongliang, et al. Effect of natural vegetation restoration age on slope soil anti-scourability in gully region of Loess Plateau[J]. Transactions of the CSAE,2018,34(22):138.
[5]	李英, 林圣玉, 张龙, 等. 鄱阳湖生态经济区坡耕地表土抗蚀性评价[J]. 中国水土保持,2016(7):48. LI Ying, LIN Shengyu, ZHANG Long, et al. Evaluation of topsoil erosion resistance of sloping land in Poyang Lake Eco-Economic Zone[J]. Soil and Water Conservation in China,2016(7):48.
[6]	赵洋毅, 周运超, 段旭. 黔中石灰岩喀斯特表层土壤结构性与土壤抗蚀抗冲性[J]. 水土保持研究,2008,15(2):18. ZHAO Yangyi, ZHOU Yunchao, DUAN Xu. Surface soil structure and its relationship with soil anti-erosion and soil anti-scour under the limestone region of karst area in the middle of Guizhou[J]. Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2008,15(2):18.
[7]	赵洋毅, 周运超, 段旭. 黔中喀斯特地区不同岩性土壤的抗蚀抗冲性研究[J]. 安徽农业科学,2007,35(29):9311. ZHAO Yangyi, ZHOU Yunchao, DUAN Xu. Anti-erodibility and anti-scourability of different lithological soils in karst area of central Guizhou province[J]. Journal of Anhui Agricultural Sciences,2007,35(29):9311.
[8]	闫思宇, 王景燕, 龚伟, 等. 川南山地林分变化对土壤物理性质和抗蚀性的影响[J]. 长江流域资源与环境,2016,25(7):1112. YAN Siyu, WANG Jingyan, GONG Wei, et al. Effects of forest change on soil physical properties and anti-erodibility in southern Sichuan Mountains[J]. Resources and Environment in the Yangtze Basin,2016,25(7):1112.
[9]	陈爱民, 严思维, 林勇明, 等. 泥石流频发区不同林龄新银合欢土壤抗蚀性评价[J]. 北京林业大学学报,2016,38(9):62. CHEN Aimin, YAN Siwei, LIN Yongming, et al. Evaluation of soil anti-erodibility at different ages of Leucaena leucocephala forests in the area with high-frequency debris flow[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University,2016,38(9):62.
[10]	金晓, 陈丽华. 晋西黄土区不同植被类型土壤抗冲性及表层根系分布特征[J]. 水土保持学报,2019,33(6):120. JIN Xiao, CHEN Lihua. Soil anti-scourability and root distribution characteristics in surface soil under different vegetation types in the loess region of western Shanxi province[J]. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation,2019,33(6):120.
[11]	周玮, 查同刚, 孙怀宁, 等. 北京八达岭地区典型林分林地土壤抗蚀性分析[J]. 中国水土保持科学,2016,14(4):84. ZHOU Wei, ZHA Tonggang, SUN Huaining, et al. Analysis of anti-erodibility of forest soil at 4 typical forest stands in Beijing Badaling area[J]. Science of Soil and Water Conservation,2016,14(4):84.
[12]	王月玲, 许浩, 马璠, 等. 宁南黄土区典型林地土壤抗冲性及相关物理性质[J]. 水土保持研究,2021,28(1):37. WANG Yueling, XU Hao, MA Fan, et al. Soil anti-scourability and its related physical properties on typical forestlands in loess hilly region of southern Ningxia[J]. Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2021,28(1):37.
[13]	ZHAO Yangyi, DUAN Xu, SHU Shumiao.The influence of typical forest types on soil erosion resistance in the water source areas of central Yunnan[J]. Asian Agricultural Research,2015,7(7):35.
[14]	吕刚, 吕金昊, 翟景轩, 等. 辽西北水蚀风蚀交错区不同土地利用类型土壤抗冲性特征[J]. 沈阳农业大学学报,2021,52(2):212. LÜ Gang, LÜ Jinhao, ZHAI Jingxuan, et al. Soil anti-scour ability characteristics of different land use patterns in the wind-water erosion crisscross region of northwest Liaoning province[J]. Journal of Shenyang Agricultural University,2021,52(2):212.
[15]	王丹丹, 张建军, 茹豪, 等. 晋西黄土高原不同地类土壤抗冲性研究[J]. 水土保持学报,2013,27(3):28. WANG Dandan, ZHANG Jianjun, RU Hao, et al. Soil erosion resistance of different land uses in Loess Plateau of western Shanxi province[J]. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation,2013,27(3):28.
[16]	王龙, 张连科, 马伊明, 等. 工程扰动对黄土抗蚀性与抗冲性的影响[J]. 水土保持学报,2021,35(4):14. WANG Long, ZHANG Lianke, MA Yiming, et al. Influence of engineering disturbance on soil anti-erodibility and anti-scourability of loess[J]. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation,2021,35(4):14.
[17]	程金花, 张洪江, 王伟, 等. 重庆四面山5种人工林保土功能评价[J]. 北京林业大学学报,2009,31(6):54. CHENG Jinhua, ZHANG Hongjiang, WANG Wei, et al. Evaluation of soil conservation capacity of five plantations in Simian Mountain, Chongqing, southwestern China[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University,2009,31(6):54.
[18]	何文华, 张洪江, 程金花,等. 重庆四面山5种人工林土壤入渗特性对比[J]. 中国水土保持科学,2015,13(2):50. HE Wenhua, ZHANG Hongjiang, CHENG Jinhua, et al. Comparison of infiltration characteristic of five typical plantations mountain of Chongqing[J]. Science of Soil and Water Conservation,2015,13(2):50.
[19]	VANNOPPEN W, De BAETS S, KEEBLE J, et al. How do root and soil characteristics affect the erosion-reducing potential of plant species?[J]. Ecological Engineering,2017,109:186.
[20]	马中浩. 南方红壤区玉米生育期坡地土壤抗侵蚀性特征[D]. 武汉:华中农业大学,2016:46. MA Zhonghao. The characteristic of anti-erosion characteristics on slope land of red soil during the growth of coin[D].Wuhan:Huazhong Agricultural University,2016:46.
[21]	王俭成, 杨建英, 史常青, 等. 北川地区典型林分土壤抗蚀性分析[J]. 水土保持学报,2013,27(1):71. WANG Jiancheng, YANG Jianying, SHI Changqing, et al. Analysis of soil anti-erodibility of different typical forests in Beichuan area[J]. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation,2013,27(1):71.
[22]	张荣, 董洪君, 周润惠, 等. 四川夹金山灌丛群落根系特征对土壤抗冲性的影响[J]. 生态学杂志,2020,39(11):355. ZHANG Rong, DONG Hongjun, ZHOU Runhui, et al. Effects of root characteristics of shrub community on soil anti-scourability in the Jiajin Mountains,Sichuan province[J]. Chinese Journal of Ecology,2020,39(11):355.
[23]	屈东旭, 吕刚, 翟景轩, 等. 科尔沁沙地南缘不同林草措施根系对土壤抗冲性的影响[J]. 水土保持研究,2020,27(1):21. QU Dongxu, LÜ Gang, ZHAI Jingxuan, et al. Effects of root system of different forest and grass measures on soil anti-scouring in southern margin of Horqin Sandy Land[J]. Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2020,27(1):21.