复垦区不同土地利用类型土壤入渗特征及其影响因素

doi:10.16843/j.sswc.2023.05.008

Abstract
Figure/Table
References
Related Citation (15)

Download: PDF (963 KB) HTML (1 KB)
Export: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

Abstract [Background] With the development and utilization of mineral resources, a series of eco-environmental problems have emerged. Land reclamation and vegetation restoration are the main measures for ecological restoration and reconstruction in mining areas. Soil infiltration is an important hydrological parameter to evaluate the water conservation capacity of soil. The study on soil infiltration characteristics and its influencing factors of different vegetation in the reclamation area is helpful to understand the improvement of soil texture by different vegetation in the mining area, and has certain guiding significance for the prevention and control of soil erosion and ecological construction. [Methods] In order to reveal the difference of soil water infiltration characteristics and its influencing factors of different land use types in reclamation area, taking four kinds of artificial restoration of vegetation (Populus woodland, Amorpha fruticosa woodland, reclaimed land and grassland) in the coal gangue reclamation area of Shanxi Yang Coal Group as the research object, the ring knife method was used to determine the soil water infiltration process of different land use types, and the correlation between soil density, soil moisture content, soil porosity, mechanical composition, water-stable aggregates and organic matter content and infiltration performance were explored through the main component analysis. [Results] 1) Compared with grassland, the soil total porosity increased by 0.71%-14.45%, the organic matter content increased by 77.67%-136.89%, and the soil density decreased by 0.65%-14.37% among Populus woodland, A. fruticosa woodland and reclaimed land in the reclaimed area; the initial infiltration rate and the steady infiltration rate were shown as Populus woodland > A. fruticosa woodland > reclaimed land > grassland, and the soil infiltration rate under the same land use type decreased with the increase of soil layer thickness. 2) The fitting of the soil infiltration process to obtain a common empirical equation was the best model to describe the soil infiltration process in this area, with a coefficient between 0.961 and 0.996, and Pearson correlation analysis showed that the soil initial infiltration rate and the steady infiltration rate were significantly and negatively correlated with the soil density (P<0.01), and the infiltration rate was significantly and positively correlated with the total porosity and organic matter content (P<0.05). 3) Principal component analysis showed that soil water-stable aggregates, porosity, mechanical composition and organic matter content were the four main factors affecting soil permeability in the reclamation area, and the cumulative contribution rate of the four was 87.760%. [Conclusions] The arbor-bush reclamation model has a strong soil water infiltration capacity, and its effect on improving soil texture is better than that of grassland reclamation model. In addition, the infiltration performance is closely related to the composition of water-stable aggregates, porosity, mechanical composition and organic matter content. The research results may provide reference for the selection of soil and water conservation tree species in reclamation area.

Key words： soil infiltration land use type infiltration model principal component analysis reclaimed area

Received: 22 July 2021

PACS:

S152.7

	Service

	E-mail this article
	Add to my bookshelf
	Add to citation manager
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	Articles by authors
	KANG Chenbo
	GUO Hanqing
	ZHANG Yao
	LIU Yang

Cite this article:

KANG Chenbo,GUO Hanqing,ZHANG Yao, et al. Soil infiltration characteristics and influencing factors of different land use types in reclaimed areas[J]. SSWC, 2023, 21(5): 71-80.

URL:

http://journal12.magtechjournal.com/Jweb_stbc/EN/10.16843/j.sswc.2023.05.008 OR http://journal12.magtechjournal.com/Jweb_stbc/EN/Y2023/V21/I5/71

[1]	王丽艳, 张成梁, 韩有志, 等. 煤矸石山不同植被恢复模式对土壤侵蚀和养分流失的影响[J]. 中国水土保持科学, 2011, 9(2):93. WANG Liyan, ZHANG Chengliang, HAN Youzhi, et al. Effects of different vegetation restoration patterns in gangue pile on soil erosion and nutrient loss[J]. Science of Soil and Water Conservation, 2011, 9(2):93.
[2]	胡振琪, 龙精华, 王新静. 论煤矿区生态环境的自修复、自然修复和人工修复[J]. 煤炭学报, 2014, 39(8):1751. HU Zhenqi, LONG Jinghua,WANG Xinjing. Self-healing, natural restoration and artificial restoration of ecological environment for coal mining[J]. Journal of China Coal Society, 2014, 39(8):1751.
[3]	郑海峰, 米俊珍, 周永利, 等. 不同植被复垦对露天矿土壤水热环境的影响[J]. 露天采矿技术, 2019, 34(5):1. ZHENG Haifeng, MI Junzhen, ZHOU Yongli, et al. Effect of different vegetation reclamation on soil hydrothermal environment in open-pit mine[J]. Opencast Mining Technology, 2019, 34(5):1.
[4]	王佳坤, 郭月峰, 祁伟, 等. 内蒙古砒砂岩土壤水平入渗特性及适用模型研究[J]. 内蒙古农业大学学报(自然科学版), 2021, 42(5):46. WANG Jiakun, GUO Yuefeng, QI Wei, et al. Horizontal infiltration characteristics and applicable models of pisha sandstone soil in Inner Mongolia[J]. Journal of Inner Mongolia Agricultural University (Natural Science Edition), 2021, 42(5):46.
[5]	李叶鑫, 吕刚, 王道涵, 等. 用3种测定方法分析排土场复垦区的表层土壤的饱和导水率[J]. 中国水土保持科学, 2019, 17(5):65. LI Yexin, LÜ Gang, WANG Daohan, et al. Analyzing the saturated hydraulic conductivity of surface soil in a dump by three measuring methods[J]. Science of Soil and Water Conservation, 2019, 17(5):65.
[6]	张耿杰. 矿区复垦土地质量监测与评价研究[D]. 北京:中国地质大学, 2013:71. ZHANG Gengjie. Study on monitoring and evaluation of the quality of reclaimed land in mining area:A case study in Pingshuo Mining Area[D]. Beijing:China University of Geosciences, 2013:71.
[7]	吕刚, 傅昕阳, 李叶鑫, 等. 海州露天煤矿排土场复垦区不同土地利用类型土壤入渗特征[J]. 水土保持学报, 2017, 31(3):123. LÜ Gang, FU Xinyang, LI Yexin, et al. Soil infiltration characteristics under different land utilization types in the dump reclamation area of the Haizhou Open-cast Coal Mine[J]. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 2017, 31(3):123.
[8]	续海龙, 魏忠义. 抚顺西露天矿复垦矸石山不同植被类型水分入渗研究[J]. 江西农业学报, 2009, 21(9):169. XV Hailong, WEI Zhongyi. Study on water infiltration of different vegetation types of Gangue mountain reclaimed in Fushun west openpit mine[J]. Acta Agriculturae Jiangxi, 2009, 21(9):169.
[9]	付微, 邵明安, 黄明斌. 神府东胜煤田复垦区土壤入渗特性的试验研究[J]. 水土保持学报, 2008, 22(3):14. FU Wei, SHAO Ming'an, HUANG Mingbin. Experimental study of soil infiltration for reclamation land in Shenmu-Fugu Dongsheng Coal Mine Area[J]. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 2008, 22(3):14.
[10]	杨国敏, 王力. 黑岱沟矿区排土场土壤水的氢氧稳定性同位素特征及入渗规律[J]. 煤炭学报, 2015, 40(4):944. YANG Guomin, WANG Li. Characteristics of stable isotopes and infiltration rule of soil water at dumping site in Heidaigou opencast coal mine[J]. Journal of China Coal Society, 2015, 40(4):944.
[11]	李木楠, 李志娟, 李素清, 等. 山西阳泉矿区煤矸石山自然定居植物群落优势种种间关系[J]. 应用与环境生物学报, 2015, 21(6):1143. LI Munan, LI Zhijuan, LI Suqing, et al. Interspecific association of dominant species in naturally colonized plant communities on coal gob piles of the Yangquan mining area in Shanxi, China[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied and Environmental Biology, 2015, 21(6):1143.
[12]	李瑶, 冯昶瑞, 周膂卓, 等. 阳泉矿区煤矸石山复垦地不同植被根际土壤酶活性季节变化[J]. 应用与环境生物学报, 2021, 27(2):416. LI Yao, FENG Changrui, ZHOU Luzhuo, et al. Ecological relationship of herb communities under different vegetation in coal gangue hill reclamation sites in Yangquan mining area[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied and Environmental Biology, 2021, 27(2):416.
[13]	郝志远, 李素清. 阳泉矿区煤矸石山复垦地不同植被下草本植物群落生态关系[J]. 应用与环境生物学报, 2018, 24(5):1158. HAO Zhiyuan, LI Suqing. Ecological relationships in herbaceous plant communities under different plantations on reclaimed coal gob piles in the Yangquan mining area, China[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied and Environmental Biology, 2018,24(5):1158.
[14]	徐勤学, 李春茂, 陈洪松, 等. 喀斯特峰丛坡地灌木林地与梯田旱地土壤水分入渗特征[J]. 农业工程学报, 2018, 34(8):124. XV Qinxue, LI Chunmao, CHEN Hongsong, et al. Characteristics of soil moisture infiltration in shrub land and terraces dryland in Karst peaks hillslopes[J]. Transactions of the CSAE, 2018, 34(8):124.
[15]	温明霞, 邵明安, 周蓓蓓. 马家塔露天煤矿复垦区不同土地利用类型的土壤水分入渗过程研究[J]. 水土保持研究, 2009, 16(4):170. WEN Mingxia, SHAO Ming'an, ZHOU Beibei. Study on soil water infiltration processes in different land use types in Majiata reclaimed regions[J]. Research of Soil and Water Conservation, 2009, 16(4):170.
[16]	吕刚, 翟景轩, 李叶鑫, 等. 辽西北风沙地不同植物群落土壤入渗特性[J]. 干旱地区农业研究, 2018, 36(4):133. LÜ Gang, ZHAI Jingxuan, LI Yexin, et al. Soil infiltration characteristics of different plant community in sandy land of northwestern Liaoning[J]. Agricultural Research in the Arid Areas, 2018, 36(4):133.
[17]	冯锦萍, 樊贵盛. 土壤入渗传输函数输入变量分析[J]. 节水灌溉, 2015, 40(2):1. FENG Jinping, FAN Guisheng. Input variable analysis of soil infiltration transfer function[J]. Water Saving Irrigation, 2015, 40(2):1.
[18]	林代杰, 郑子成, 张锡洲, 等. 不同土地利用方式下土壤入渗特征及其影响因素[J]. 水土保持学报, 2010, 24(1):33. LIN Daijie, ZHENG Zicheng, ZHANG Xizhou, et al. Characteristic and influencing factors of soil infiltration of different land use patterns[J]. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 2010, 24(1):33.
[19]	杨政, 王冬, 刘玉, 等. 矿区排土场人工草地土壤水分及入渗特征效应[J]. 草业学报, 2015, 24(12):29. YANG Zheng, WANG Dong, LIU Yu, et al. Soil moisture and infiltration characteristics for artificial pasture planted on opencast coal mining tailings[J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2015, 24(12):29.
[20]	刘洁, 李贤伟, 纪中华, 等. 元谋干热河谷三种植被恢复模式土壤贮水及入渗特性[J]. 生态学报, 2011, 31(8):2331. LIU Jie, LI Xianwei, JI Zhonghua, et al. Soil water holding capacities and infiltration characteristics of three vegetation restoration models in dry-hot valley of Yuanmou[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2011, 31(8):2331.
[21]	白中科, 赵景逵, 李晋川, 等. 大型露天煤矿生态系统受损研究:以平朔露天煤矿为例[J]. 生态学报, 1999, 19(6):870. BAI Zhongke, ZHAO Jingkui, LI Jinchuan, et al. Ecosystem damage in a large opencast coal mine:A case study on Pingshuo Surface Coal Mine, China[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 1999, 19(6):870.
[22]	康世勇. 马家塔露天矿土地复垦方式探讨[J]. 露天采煤技术, 1998, 14(2):48. KANG Shiyong. Discussion on land reclamation methods in Majiata open pit mine[J]. Opencast Mining Technology, 1998, 14(2):48.