|
|
Soil water-holding capacity under different land use types in the Three Gorges Reservoir area |
HOU Wenning, WANG Haiyan, NING Yihong, ZOU Jiahe, ZHAO Han |
Key Laboratory for Silviculture and Conservation of Ministry of Education, College of Forestry, Beijing Forestry University, 100083, Beijing, China |
|
|
Abstract [Background] Soil water-holding capacity determines its function of water conservation and indirectly reflects its capacity of water redistribution. Land use type is one of the factors affecting soil water-holding capacity. Reasonable land use types may improve soil structure and soil fertility, and adjust hydrothermal conditions for plant growth. Thus, it is desirable to take the soil under three land use types (garden, woodland and farmland) in six catchment areas of the Sunxi River watershed in Jiangjin city, Chongqing as the research object to explore the differences and influencing factors of soil water-holding capacity. The result may provide a reference for the selection of land use types in the Three Gorges Reservoir area. [Methods] We collected 126 undisturbed soil samples in total under garden, woodland and farmland for soil bulk density and water-holding capacity measurement, and 126 composite soil samples for organic matter determination. The ANOVA was used to clarify the differences of soil bulk density, soil porosity and soil water-holding capacity under different land use types and different catchment areas, and correlation analysis and stepwise regression were applied to find out the dominant factors affecting soil water-holding capacity. [Results] 1) Significant differences were found for soil bulk density, total porosity and non-capillary porosity at soil depth of 20-40 cm under different land use types (P<0.05). The soil bulk density was in the order of farmland> garden> woodland with a significant difference between farmland and woodland, while the total porosity and non-capillary porosity showed the opposite trend. 2) The mean values of soil saturated water content, capillary water capacity and field capacity of woodland at 0-40 cm were the largest, and the soil water-holding capacity was woodland> garden> farmland. 3) The water-holding capacity was shown as lower section> middle section> upper section of the Sunxi River with a significant difference between the lower section and the upper section under the same land use type (P<0.05). 4) At depth of 0-40 cm, the soil water-holding capacity showed a significantly negative correlation with soil bulk density,significant positive correlations with total porosity, capillary porosity, non-capillary porosity and soil aeration (P<0.05), but no significant correlations with soil volumetric water content and soil organic matter content (P>0.05).[Conclusions] Soil water-holding capacity is the highest in the woodland and the lowest in the farmland. Soil bulk density and soil porosity are the main affecting factors. The results can provide a reference for land use planning and data support for soil erosion control in Jiangjin city.
|
Received: 19 May 2022
|
|
|
|
|
[1] |
王紫薇,黄来明,邵明安,等.青海高寒区不同土地利用方式下土壤持水能力及影响因素[J].干旱区研究,2021,38(6):1722. WANG Ziwei, HUANG Laiming, SHAO Ming'an, et al. Soil water holding capacity under different land use patterns in the Qinghai alpine region[J]. Arid Zone Research, 2021, 38(6):1722.
|
[2] |
XIE Shiyou, REN Wei. Soil moisture characteristics in karst area with different land use types[J]. Agricultural Science and Technology, 2013, 14(12):1856.
|
[3] |
丁俊男,于少鹏,史传奇,等.寒区湿地不同土地利用方式对土壤理化性质和团聚体稳定性的影响[J].生态学杂志,2021,40(11):3543. DING Junnan, YU Shaopeng, SHI Chuanqi, et al. Effects of land use types on soil physicochemical proper-ties and aggregates stability in cold region wetland[J]. Chinese Journal of Ecology, 2021, 40(11):3543.
|
[4] |
HU Wei, SHAO Mingan, HAN Fengpeng, et al. Spatio-temporal variability behavior of land surface soil water content in shrub- and grass-land[J]. Geoderma, 2011, 162(3):260.
|
[5] |
ZHOU Qiuwen, SUN Zhiyan, LIU Xiaolin, et al. Temporal soil moisture variations in different vegetation cover types in karst areas of southwest China:A plot scale case study[J]. Water, 2019, 11(7):1423.
|
[6] |
阮芯竹,程金花,张洪江,等.重庆市四面山不同土地利用类型饱和导水率[J].水土保持通报,2015,35(1):79. RUAN Xinzhu, CHENG Jinhua, ZHANG Hongjiang,et al. Saturated hydraulic conductivity of different land use types in Simian Mountain of Chongqing City[J]. Bulletin of Soil and Water Conservation, 2015, 35(1):79.
|
[7] |
徐贵来,张洪江,吕相海,等.重庆四面山五种人工林土壤有机碳储量研究[J].生态环境学报,2014,23(2):211. XU Guilai, ZHANG Hongjiang, LÜ Xiangmei, et al. The soil organic carbon storage study under five plantations in the Simian Mountain of Chongqing[J]. Ecology and Environmental Sciences, 2014, 23(2):211.
|
[8] |
李月臣,刘春霞,闵婕,等.三峡库区生态系统服务功能重要性评价[J].生态学报,2013,33(1):168. LI Yuechen, LIU Chunxia, MIN Jie, et al. RS/GIS-based integrated evaluation of the ecosystem services of the Three Gorges Reservoir Area (Chongqing section)[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2013, 33(1):168.
|
[9] |
蒋光毅,黄嵩,郭宏忠.三峡库区水土流失综合治理现状与展望[J].中国水土保持,2021(8):27. JIANG Guangyi, HUANG Song, GUO Hongzhong. Comprehensive situation and prospect of soil loss control in the Three Gorges Reservoir Area[J]. Soil and Water Conservation in China, 2021(8):27.
|
[10] |
马良,黄志霖,华琳.三峡库区小流域土地利用结构对土壤养分流失及水质影响[J].水生态学杂志,2022,43(1):1. MA Liang, HUANG Zhilin, HUA Lin. Effects of land use on soil nutrient loss and water quality in the Three Gorges Reservoir Area of China[J]. Journal of Hydroecology, 2022, 43(1):1.
|
[11] |
鲍士旦.土壤农化分析:第3版[M].北京:中国农业出版社,1999:30. BAO Shidan. Soil Agrochemical Analysis:3rd Edition[M]. Beijing:China Agricultural Press, 1999:30.
|
[12] |
邵明安,王全九,黄明斌.土壤物理学[M].北京:高等教育出版社,2006:137. SHAO Ming'an, WANG Quanjiu, HUANG Mingbin. Soil Physics[M]. Beijing:Higher Education Press, 2006:137.
|
[13] |
张诗祁,牛文全,李国春.关中平原田间土壤含水量的空间变异性[J].应用生态学报,2020,31(3):821. ZHANG Shiqi, NIU Wenquan, LI Guochun. Spatial variability of soil water content in field of Guanzhong Plain, Northwest China[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2020, 31(3):821.
|
[14] |
熊艳艳,吴先球.粗大误差四种判别准则的比较和应用[J].大学物理实验,2010,23(1):66. XIONG Yanyan, WU Xianqiu. The generalizing application of four judging criteria for gross errors[J].Physical Experiment of College, 2010, 23(1):66.
|
[15] |
马婧怡,贾宁凤,程曼.黄土丘陵区不同土地利用方式下土壤水分变化特征[J].生态学报,2018,38(10):3471. MA Jingyi, JIA Ningfeng, CHENG Man. Water characteristics of soil under different land-use types in the Loess Plateau region[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2018, 38(10):3471.
|
[16] |
张治伟,朱章雄,文志林.岩溶山地不同用地类型表层土壤持水性能研究[J].灌溉排水学报,2015,34(4):95. ZHANG Zhiwei, ZHU Zhangxiong, WEN Zhilin. Soil water holding capacity in surface soil under different land use patterns in Karst Mountain Areas[J]. Journal of Irrigation and Drainage, 2015, 34(4):95.
|
[17] |
葛东媛,张洪江,王伟,等.重庆四面山林地土壤水分特性[J].北京林业大学学报,2010,32(4):155. GE Dongyuan, ZHANG Hongjiang, WANG Wei, et al. Soil water characteristics of forestlands in the Simian Mountains of Chongqing southwestern China[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2010, 32(4):155.
|
[18] |
张敏,刘爽,刘勇,等.黄土丘陵缓坡风沙区不同土地利用类型土壤水分变化特征[J].水土保持学报,2019,33(3):115. ZHANG Min, LIU Shuang, LIU Yong, et al. Soil moisture variation characteristics of different land use types in the moderate sloop sandy areas of loess hilly region[J]. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 2019, 33(3):115.
|
[19] |
PENG Wanxia, SONG Tongqing, ZENG Fuping, et al. Spatial distribution of surface soil water content under different vegetation types in northwest Guangxi, China[J]. Environmental Earth Sciences, 2013, 69(8):2699.
|
[20] |
刘艳丽,李成亮,高明秀,等.不同土地利用方式对黄河三角洲土壤物理特性的影响[J].生态学报,2015,35(15):5183. LIU Yanli, LI Chengliang, GAO Mingxiu, et al.Effect of different land-use patterns on physical characteristics of the soil in the Yellow River delta region[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2015, 35(15):5183.
|
[21] |
娄淑兰,刘目兴,易军,等.三峡山地不同类型植被和坡位对土壤水文功能的影响[J].生态学报,2019,39(13):4844. LOU Shulan, LIU Muxing, YI Jun, et al. Influence of vegetation coverage and topographic position on soil hydrological function in the hillslope of the Three Gorges Area[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2019, 39(13):4844.
|
[22] |
KHLOSI M, CORNELISW M, DOUAIK A. Exploration of the interaction between hydraulic and physico-chemical properties of Syrian soils[J]. Vadose Zone Journal, 2013, 12(4):1.
|
|
|
|