永定河流域(北京段)不同生态护岸形式坡面侵蚀及面源污染特征

doi:10.16843/j.sswc.2022.01.010

Abstract
Figure/Table
References
Related Citation (15)

Download: PDF (2005 KB) HTML (1 KB)
Export: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

Abstract [Background] The Yongding River is the mother river of Beijing. It has bred a deep cultural heritage for the city of Beijing, and It is also the city's flood protection barrier, water supply channel and water source protection area. Due to the dry climate, the amount of incoming water has been declining, which has caused the river in the lower reaches of the Yongding River to be cut off for many years. Vegetation is difficult to grow and vegetation coverage was low, and the ecological environment of the river has been severely damaged. It is urgent to restore the Yongding River ecosystem.[Methods] This study used runoff plot to conduct water scouring experiments and organically combines the research of ecological bank protection and slope protection. Five types of revetment materials (geogrid, nature stone, ecological bag, gabion, and pine wood pile) were used to obtain 9 types of arrangements. Two revetment slope ratios were experimentally set up, and a total of 13 standard runoff plots were established in the field. Runoff and sediment in different runoff areas and the reduction rates of five non-point source pollution indicators, including total nitrogen (TN), total phosphorus (TP), ammonia nitrogen (NH⁺₄-N), chemical oxygen demand (COD), and biological oxygen demand (BOD₅) were measured. Based on this, the ecological protection effects of different forms of ecological revetments in the Yongding River Basin (Beijing Section) were studied.[Results] The ecological bag caused an average runoff reduction effect of 31.57% and an average sediment reduction effect of 70.70%. Compared with the single eco-bag revetment, the ecological bag composite revetment had an effect of reducing runoff by more than 22.63%, and the effect of reducing sediment by more than 3.25%. The arrangement of the revetment increased the turbulence of the water flow so that the runoff Reynolds number increased, but all were <500, which was still in the laminar range. The Froude number was lower than that of the blank control area, and all were greater than 1, belonging to the rapid flow state. The reduction of runoff by eco-bag revetment was not as good as that of gabion revetment under a slope ratio of 1:1, but the reduction effect of sediment was better than that of gabion revetment.[Conclusions] The ecological bag demonstrates the best effect on reducing runoff sediment among the five shore protection materials, at the same time, the effect is significant on TP, TN, NH⁺₄-N, COD, and BOD₅. Compared with the single revetment form, the composite revetment form presents a better effect on reducing runoff sediment, and at the same time, it has better control effect on non-point source pollution. Runoff Reynolds number and Froude number increase with the increase of discharge flow. With the increase of the slope, the runoff reduction effect of eco-bag revetment gradually is reduced, the sediment reduction effect of gabion revetment is reduced.

Key words： simplified runoff plot sediment interception via ecological revetment water quality improvement via ecological revetment hydrodynamic characteristics

Received: 16 March 2020

PACS:

S157.1

	Service

	E-mail this article
	Add to my bookshelf
	Add to citation manager
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	Articles by authors
	LI Kai
	CHENG Jinhua
	QI Shenglin

Cite this article:

LI Kai,CHENG Jinhua,QI Shenglin. Characteristics of slope erosion and non-point source pollution in different ecological revetment in Yongding River Basin (Beijing section)[J]. SSWC, 2022, 20(1): 74-83.

URL:

http://journal12.magtechjournal.com/Jweb_stbc/EN/10.16843/j.sswc.2022.01.010 OR http://journal12.magtechjournal.com/Jweb_stbc/EN/Y2022/V20/I1/74

[1]	胡海泓. 生态型护岸及其应用前景[J]. 广西水利水电, 1999(4):57. HU Haihong. Ecological bank protection and its application prospect[J]. Guangxi Water Resources & Hydropower Engineering, 1999(4):57.
[2]	苏敏婷, 余宇翔. 我国生态护岸的发展现状[J]. 江西农业, 2018(16):65. SU Minting, YU Yuxiang. Development status of ecological bank protection in China[J]. Jiangxi Agriculture, 2018(16):65.
[3]	SEIFERT A. Naturnäherer wasserbau[J]. Deutsche Wasserwirtschaft,1983, 33(12):361.
[4]	LAUB B G, PALMER M A. Restoration ecology of rivers[J].Encyclopedia of Inland Waters,2009(1):332.
[5]	ODUM H T. The energy ethic. (Book reviews:Environment, power, and society)[J]. Science, 1971, 172(3984):664.
[6]	FREER R. Use of vegetation in civil engineering[J]. Construction & Building Materials, 1991, 5(1):23.
[7]	郑天柱, 周建仁. 污染河道的生态恢复机理研究[J]. 环境科学动态, 2002(3):12. ZHENG Tianzhu, ZHOU Jianren. Study on ecological recovery mechanism of polluted river[J]. Environmental Science Trends, 2002(3):12.
[8]	陈明曦, 陈芳清, 刘德富. 应用景观生态学原理构建城市河道生态护岸[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2007, 16(1):97. CHEN Mingxi, CHEN Fangqing, LIU Defu. Applying the principles of landscape ecology to construct ecological revetments in urban rivers[J]. Resources and Environment in the Yangtze Basin,2007,16(1):97.
[9]	董哲仁. 生态水工学的理论框架[J]. 水利学报, 2003, 34(1):1. DONG Zheren. The theoretical framework of ecological hydraulics[J]. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 2003, 34(1):1.
[10]	胡承江, 李雄. 1979-2013年北京市永定河流域平原城市段核心区域植被盖度演变分析[J]. 中国园林, 2015, 31(9):12. HU Chengjiang, LI Xiong. Analysis of vegetation cover change in the core area of the plain urban section of Yongding River basin from 1979 to 2013[J]. Chinese Landscape Architecture, 2015, 31(9):12.
[11]	邢富茹. 转变治河思路,为恢复永定河生态环境而努力[C]. 北京城市水利建设与发展国际学术研讨会论文集. 北京:北京市水务局,北京市科学技术协会,中国水利学会, 2004:242. XING Furu. Transforming river management thinking and working to restore the ecological environment of the Yongding River[C]//Proceedings of the International Symposium on Urban Water Conservancy Construction and Development in Beijing. Beijing:Beijing Water Authority. Beijing Association of Science and Technology:Chinese Hydraulic Engineering Society, 2004:242.
[12]	刘继楠, 孙丽媛. 浅谈生态护坡在防洪工程中的应用[J]. 民营科技, 2010(12):272. LIU Jinan, SUN Liyuan. Application of ecological slope protection in flood control engineering[J]. Min Ying Ke Ji, 2010(12):272.
[13]	唐国滔, 姚焕玫, 胡湛波. 生态护岸技术的研究及其发展趋势[J]. 水产科技情报, 2010, 37(4):198. TANG Guotao. YAO Huanmei, HU Zhanbo. Research and development trend of ecological revetment technology[J]. Fisheries Science & Technology Information, 2010, 37(4):198.
[14]	LOWRANCE R, LEONARD R, SHERIDAN. Managing riparian ecosystems to control non-point pollution[J]. Journal of Soil & Water Conservation, 1985, 40(1):87.
[15]	谢颂华, 方少文, 王农. 水土保持试验径流小区设计探讨[J]. 人民长江, 2013, 44(17):83. XIE Songhua, FANG Shaowen, WANG Nong. Discussion on design of runoff plot for soil and water conservation test[J]. Yangtze River, 2013, 44(17):83.
[16]	陈明权. 径流小区结构设计新探[J]. 中国水土保持, 1994(4):14. CHEN Mingquan. New exploration on structural design of runoff community[J]. Soil and Water Conservation in China, 1994(4):14.
[17]	张建. 永定河(北京段)典型生态护岸材料和结构筛选[D]. 北京:北京林业大学, 2019:39. ZHANG Jian. Screening of typical ecological revement materials and structures in Yongding River(Beijing section)[D]. Beijing:Beijing Forestry University, 2019:39.
[18]	苏涛, 张兴昌, 赵怀玉. 砒砂岩地区坡面径流水动力学特性研究[J]. 西北农林科技大学学报:自然科学版, 2011,39(8):211. SU Tao, ZHANG Xingchang, ZHAO Huaiyu. Study on hydrodynamic characteristics of slope runoff in pisha sandstone area[J]. Journal of Northwest A & F University:Natural Science Edition, 2011,39(8):211.
[19]	郑科, 赵亚云, 孙靖, 等. 地表水中总磷的2种测定方法的比对试验研究[J]. 绿色科技,2018(22):52. ZHENG Ke, ZHAO Yayun, SUN Jing, et al. Comparative experimental study on two methods for measuring total phosphorus in surface water[J]. Journal of Green Science and Technology,2018(22):52.
[20]	彭鹏, 石慧. 碱性过硫酸钾消解紫外分光光度法测定水样中的总氮[J]. 污染防治技术, 2008(2):86. PENG Peng, SHI Hui. Determination of total nitrogen in water samples by basic potassium persulfate digestion and ultraviolet spectrophotometry[J]. Pollution Control Technology,2008(2):86.
[21]	黄亿, 张绍斌. 纳氏试剂分光光度法测定水中氨氮的影响因素浅析[J]. 四川环境, 2016, 35(3):23. HUANG Yi, ZHANG Shaobin. Analysis of influential factors in the determination of ammonia nitrogen in water by Nessler's Reagent Spectrophotometry[J]. Sichuan Environment, 2016, 35(3):23.
[22]	黄勇刚. 重铬酸盐法测定化学需氧量新旧方法对比研究[J]. 资源节约与环保, 2019(1):41. HUANG Yonggang. Comparative study of new and old methods for determining COD with dichromate method[J]. Resources Economization & Environment Protection, 2019(1):41.
[23]	杨汉, 彭晓燕. 水样BOD5测定中稀释倍数的正确选取[J]. 环境污染与防治,1992, 14(6):28. YANG Han, PENG Xiaoyan. Correct selection of dilution factor in water sample BOD5 determination[J].Environmental Pollution & Control,1992, 14(6):28.
[24]	肖培青, 郑粉莉, 姚文艺. 坡沟系统坡面径流流态及水力学参数特征研究[J]. 水科学进展, 2009, 20(2):236. XIAO Peiqing, ZHENG Fenli, YAO Wenyi. Study on the characteristics of runoff and hydraulic parameters of slope and ditch system[J]. Advances in Water Science, 2009, 20(2):236.
[25]	王越. 北京永定河生态护岸综合评价研究[D]. 北京:北京林业大学, 2013. WANG Yue. Research on comprehensive evaluation of ecological revetment of Beijing Yongding River[D]. Beijing:Beijing Forestry University, 2013.
[26]	刘娜娜, 杨德全, 张书宽. 生态河道中护岸形式的探索及应用[J]. 中国农村水利水电, 2006(10):97. LIU Nana, YANG Dequan, ZHANG Shukuan. Exploration and application of bank protection forms in ecological rivers[J]. China Rural Water and Hydropower, 2006(10):97.
[27]	肖培青, 郑粉莉, 姚文艺. 坡沟产沙关系及其侵蚀机理研究进展[J]. 水土保持研究, 2004,11(4):101. XIAO Peiqing, ZHENG Fenli, YAO Wenyi. Research progress on the relationship between slope yield and sediment erosion and its erosion mechanism[J]. Research of Soil and Water Conservation, 2004,11(4):101.
[28]	吴东, 黄志霖, 肖文发, 等. 三峡库区典型退耕还林模式土壤养分流失控制[J]. 环境科学, 2015(10):285. WU Dong, HUANG Zhilin, XIAO Wenfa, et al. Control of soil nutrient loss in a typical model of returning farmland to forest in Three Gorges Reservoir area[J]. Environmental Science, 2015(10):285.