|
|
Application of neighborhood interference model in Pinus tabuliformis plantation in eastern Liaoning province |
YANG Xia, CHEN Lihua |
School of Soil and Water Conservation, Beijing Forestry University, 100083, Beijing, China |
|
|
Abstract [Background] Pinus tabuliformis is widely distributed in eastern Liaoning province and is one of the main plantations in this area. This paper discusses the interference model of P. tabulaeformis plantation in Wandao Forest Farm of Fushun county, which provides certain quantitative basis for the study of plantation ecosystem in this area, and provides reference for the scientific and effective management and updating of plantation, and maximizes the ecological and economic benefits of plantation.[Methods] Field survey was conducted in Wandao Forest Farm in June 2018. Three sample plots of 20 m×20 m were set up with P. tabuliformis plantation as the research object. By adopting the fixed sample plot survey method, the factors of the cardinal tree and its adjacent body in the sample plot were actually measured. In this study, an improved neighborhood interference model was adopted to calculate neighborhood interference index, and the relationship between interference index and DBH, tree height, habitat utilization ratio (crown width area) and height-to-diameter ratio was discussed.[Results] 1) The interference index of adjacent body of P. tabuliformis in different P. tabuliformis sample plots was between 0.89 and 31.96, and the interference index decreased with the increase of DBH, tree height and habitat utilization ratio, and increased with the increase of height-to-diameter ratio. 2) Stand density also had some influence on interference index. The stand density of sample plot 1 was relatively large, thus the fluctuation range of interference index was larger, and the maximum interference index reached 31.96, the density of sample plot 2 and 3 was small, and the change of interference index was relatively stable. 3) Young trees in stands were disturbed by neighbors and were in an inferior position in the competition for resources and space, and the tall trees were in a dominant position with little interference. 4) The interference index varied with DBH, tree height, habitat utilization rate and height-diameter ratio within a certain range. When the interference index exceeded a certain range of a factor, it tended to be a certain fixed value. Interference index was significantly correlated with DBH, tree height and habitat utilization ratio (P<0.01), but not significantly correlated with height-todiameter ratio (P>0.05).[Conclusions] Through the above studies, it can be seen that the neighborhood interference model can accurately reflect the extent to which the cardinal tree is affected by neighborhood, it is a quantitative index describing the growth status and status of trees, which can be used to guide forest management activities and provide theoretical basis for rational management.
|
Received: 11 April 2019
|
|
|
|
|
[1] |
WEIGELT A, JOLLIFFE P. Indices of plant competition[J]. Journal of Ecology, 2003, 91(5):707.
|
[2] |
CANHAM C D, PAPAIK M J, URIARTE M, et al. Neighborhood analyses of canopy tree competition along environmental gradients in new England forests[J]. Ecological Applications, 2006, 16(2):540.
|
[3] |
ANNING A K, MCCARTHY B C, ET AL. Competition, size and age affect tree growth response to fuel reduction treatments in mixed-oak forests of Ohio[J]. Forest Ecology and Management, 2013, 307(1):74.
|
[4] |
唐杨,陈红,童跃伟,等. 长白山阔叶红松林不同强度择伐后关键树种的竞争关系[J]. 应用生态学报, 2019,30(5):1469. TANG Yang, CHEN Hong, TONG Yuewei, et al. Competition of key tree species with selective cutting at different intensities in broadleaved Korean pine mixed forest in the Changbai Mountain, China[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2019, 30(5):1469.
|
[5] |
洪伟, 吴承祯. 邻体干扰指数模型的改进及其应用研究[J]. 林业科学, 2001, 37(S1):1. HONG Wei, WU Chengzhen. Study on the improvement and application of the neighborhood interference index model[J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2001, 37(S1):1.
|
[6] |
宋丁全, 姜志林, 郑作孟, 等. 光皮桦群落邻体干扰指数的研究[J]. 生态学杂志, 2002, 21(3):152. SONG Dingquan, JIANG Zhilin, ZHENG Zuomeng, et al. Neighborhood interference index in Betula luminifera community[J]. Chinese Journal of Ecology, 2002, 21(3):152.
|
[7] |
CORTINI F, COMEAU P G. Evaluation of competitive effects of green alder, willow and other tall shrubs on white spruce and lodge pole pine in Northern Alberta[J]. Forest ecology and management, 2008, 255(1):82.
|
[8] |
王晓霞, 张钦弟, 毕润成, 等. 山西稀有濒危植物脱皮榆种内和种间竞争[J]. 生态学杂志, 2013, 32(7):1756. WANG Xiaoxia, ZHANG Qindi, BI Runcheng, et al. Intra-and inter-specific competition of rare and endangered plant Ulmus lamellosa in Shanxi[J]. Chinese Journal of Ecology, 2013, 32(7):1756.
|
[9] |
朱教君. 次生林经营基础研究进展[J]. 应用生态学报, 2002, 13(12):1689. ZHU Jiaojun. A review on fundamental studies of secondary forest management[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2002,13(12):1689.
|
[10] |
张池, 黄忠良, 李炯, 等. 黄果厚壳桂种内与种间竞争的数量关系[J]. 应用生态学报, 2006, 17(1):22. ZHANG Chi, HUANG Zhongliang, LI Jiong, et al. Quantitative relationships of intra-and inter-specific competition in Cryptocarya concinna[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2006, 17(1):22.
|
[11] |
黄小波, 刘万德, 苏建荣, 等. 云南松天然林的种内和种间竞争[J]. 林业科学研究, 2016, 29(2):209. HUANG Xiaobo, LIU Wande, SU Jianrong, et al. Intraspecific and interspecific competition of Pinus yunnanensis natural forest[J]. Forest Research, 2016, 29(2):209.
|
[12] |
宁金魁. 水源涵养林结构调整研究[D]. 北京:北京林业大学, 2004:15. NING Jinkui. Studies on the regulation of water resourees protection forest(W. R. P. F.)[D]. Beijing:Beijing Forestry University, 2004:15.
|
[13] |
宁金魁, 郑小贤, 高甲荣, 等. 干扰指数在密云县侧柏水源涵养林中的应用[J]. 北京林业大学学报, 2003, 25(6):15. NING Jinkui, ZHENG Xiaoxian, GAO Jiarong, et al. Application of interference index in water conservation forest of Platycladus orientalis in Miyun county, Beijing[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2003, 25(6):15.
|
[14] |
刘宪钊, 陆元昌, 任云卯. 油松人工林单木邻体竞争模型[J]. 生态学杂志, 2016, 35(11):3126. LIU Xianzhao, LU Yuanchang, REN Yunmao. Individual adjacent competition model of Pinus tabuliformis plantation[J]. Chinese Journal of Ecology, 2016, 35(11):3126.
|
[15] |
余新晓, 甘敬. 水源涵养林研究与示范[M]. 北京:中国林业出版社, 2007:214. YU Xinxiao, GAN Jing. Research and demonstration on water conservation forest[M]. Beijing:China Forestry Publishing House,2007:214.
|
[16] |
WEINER J. A neighborhood model of annual plant interference[J]. Journal of Ecology, 1982, 63(5):1237.
|
[17] |
WEINER J. Neighborhood interference amongst Pinus rigdata individuals[J]. Journal of Ecology, 1984, 72(1):183.
|
[18] |
张大勇, 赵松岭, 张鹏云, 等. 青杄林恢复演替过程中的邻体竞争效应及邻体干扰指数的改进模型[J]. 生态学报, 1989, 9(1):53. ZHANG Dayong, ZHAO Songling, ZHANG Pengyun, et al. On neighborhood effects in a successional community and an impreved index of neibourhood interference[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica,1989, 9(1):53.
|
[19] |
张跃西. 邻体干扰模型的改进及其在营林中的应用[J]. 植物生态学与地植物学学报, 1993, 17(4):352. ZHANG Yuexi. Application and improvement of the neighborhood interference model[J]. Acta Phytoecologica etGeobotanica Sinica, 1993, 17(4):352.
|
[20] |
蓝斌, 洪伟, 吴承祯, 等. 马尾松幼龄林干扰指数的研究[J]. 江西农业大学学报, 1995, 17(3):263. LAN Bin, HONG Wei, WU Chengzhen, et al. A study on interference index of Pinus massoniana[J]. Acta Agriculturae Universitatis Jiangxiensis, 1995, 17(3):263.
|
[21] |
薛俊杰, 白景萍, 郭晋平, 等. 邻体干扰模型的改进[J]. 山西农业大学学报, 1999, 19(2):51. XUE Junjie, BAI Jingping, GUO Jinping, et al. Improvement of the neighbourhood interference of model[J]. Journal of Shanxi Agricultural University, 1999, 19(2):51.
|
[22] |
洪伟, 吴承祯, 蓝斌. 邻体干扰指数通用模型及其应用[J]. 植物生态学报, 1997, 21(2):54. HONG Wei, WU Chengzhen, LAN Bin. General model for neighborhood interference index and its application[J]. Acta Phytoecologica Sinica,1997, 21(2):54.
|
[23] |
洪伟, 吴承祯. 马尾松人工林经营模式及应用[M]. 北京:中国林业出版社, 2007:65. HONG Wei, WU Chengzhen. Management model and application of Pinus massoniana plantation[M]. Beijing:China Forestry Publishing House, 2007:65.
|
[24] |
任玫玫, 杨华. 长白山云冷杉林优势树种的竞争[J]. 应用生态学报, 2016, 27(10):3089. REN Meimei, YANG Hua. Competition among dominant tree species in a natural spruce-fir forest in Changbai Mountain[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2016, 27(10):3089.
|
[25] |
项小燕, 吴甘霖, 段仁燕, 等. 大别山五针松种内和种间竞争强度[J]. 生态学报, 2015, 35(2):389. XIANG Xiaoyan, WU Ganlin, DUAN Renyan, et al. Intraspecific and interspecific competition of Pinus dabeshanesis[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2015, 35(2):389.
|
[26] |
李帅锋, 刘万德, 苏建荣, 等. 滇西北金沙江流域云南红豆杉群落种内与种间竞争[J]. 生态学杂志, 2013, 32(1):33. LI Shuafeng, LIU Wangde, SU Jianrong, et al. Intraand interspecific competitions of Taxus yunnanensis population in Jinsha River Basin of Northwest Yunnan province, Southwest China[J]. Chinese Journal of Ecology, 2013, 32(1):33.
|
[27] |
巢林, 刘艳艳, 张伟东, 等. 沼泽交错带白桦个体生长动态及径级结构与种内种间竞争[J]. 生态学杂志, 2017, 36(3):577. CHAO Lin, LIU Yanyan, ZHANG Weidong, et al. Diameter class structure, growth dynamic, intraspecific and interspecific competitions of Betula platyphylla on swamp ecotone[J]. Chinese Journal of Ecology, 2017, 36(3):577.
|
[28] |
刘怡青, 田育红, 宋含章, 等. 胸径和林分密度决定内蒙古东部落叶松林种内竞争[J]. 生态学杂志, 2018, 37(3):847. LIU Yiqing, TIAN Yuhong, SONG Hanzhang, et al. DBH and stand density regulate intraspecific competition of Larix gmelinii in eastern Inner Mongolia[J]. Chinese Journal of Ecology, 2018, 37(3):847.
|
[29] |
张宁, 张怀清, 林辉, 等. 基于竞争指数的杉木林分生长可视化模拟研究[J]. 林业科学研究, 2013, 26(6):692. ZHANG Ning, ZHANG Huaiqing, LIN Hui, et al. Visual simulation of growth process in Cunninghamia lanceolata based on competition index[J]. Forest Research, 2013, 26(6):692.
|
[30] |
邢海涛, 陆元昌, 刘宪钊, 等. 基于近自然改造的马尾松林分竞争强度研究[J]. 北京林业大学学报, 2016, 38(9):42. XING Haitao, LU Yuanchang, LIU Xianzhao, et al. Competition intensity of Pinus massoniana stand based on close-to-nature management[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2016, 38(9):42.
|
[31] |
李际平, 房晓娜, 封尧, 等. 基于加权Voronoi图的林木竞争指数[J]. 北京林业大学学报, 2015, 37(3):61. LI Jiping, FANG Xiaona, FENG Yao, et al. Tree competition indexes based on weighted Voronoi diagram[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry,2015, 37(3):61.
|
[32] |
高岗. 以水源涵养为目标的低功能人工林更新技术研究[D]. 呼和浩特:内蒙古农业大学, 2009:57. GAO Gang. Study on the artificial forest reforming techniques of lower water-conserving function[D]. Hohhot:Inner Mongolia Agricultural University, 2009:57.
|
|
|
|