3种华北石质山区造林树种抗旱性评价

doi:10.16843/j.sswc.2019.05.012

Abstract
Figure/Table
References
Related Citation (9)

Download: PDF (921 KB) HTML (1 KB)
Export: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

Abstract [Background] The soil in the lithoid hilly area of North China is poor and the soil erosion is serious, which severely restricts the productivity of these undeveloped mountains. Vegetation restoration is an important measure in recovering ecological environment. A large number of studies have shown that when plants are subjected to drought stress, a series of physiological changes will be produced in plants to adapt to drought stress, but the response characteristics, adaptability and physiological mechanisms of different plants to drought stress vary. Therefore, studying the response characteristics and physiological mechanisms of different tree species under drought stress has important practical significance for its application in barren hills greening and vegetation restoration.[Methods] Using the test method of potted water control, 10 2-year old plants and consistent Fraxinus chinensis, Quercus acutissima and Gleditsia sinensis seedlings were selected as test materials, and their photosynthesis parameters, MDA content,cell membrane permeability,relative water content, leaf chlorophyll content, SOD activity, and proline content in response to drought stress under continuous drought conditions were determined. The relationship between each physiological index and drought resistance was compared by grey relational analysis, the drought resistance of three tree species was comprehensively evaluated by membership function method.[Results] 1) With the drought increasing, the MDA content, membrane permeability and SOD activity of three tree species increased, while the relative water content and net photosynthetic rate of leaves decreased, and the chlorophyll content of Q. acutissima increased. 2) The proline content of the G. sinensis was greatly increased, and the proline content of the F. chinensis and Q. acutissima remained substantially unchanged. The drought resistance of three tree species under moderate or severe drought stress was ranked by membership function method, the results showed as G. sinensis > Q. acutissima > F. chinensis. 3) Grey correlation analysis showed that the correlation between the indexes of moderate drought conditions and drought resistance was as follows:leaf relative water content (0.784) > SOD activity (0.723) > chlorophyll content (0.652) > cell membrane permeability (0.527) > MDA content (0.526) > net photosynthetic Rate (0.506) > proline content (0.503). The correlation between various indicators and drought resistance in severe drought conditions was as:leaf relative water content (0.749) > cell membrane permeability(0.632) > net photosynthetic rate(0.563) > SOD activity (0.543) > MDA content (0.528) > chlorophyll content (0.508) > proline content (0.506).[Conclusions] The three tree species have certain commonality in the means of resisting drought, that is, to prevent drought stress by maintaining the leaf water and SOD to eliminate free radicals and reducing the degree of lipid membrane peroxidation. This research can distinguish the differences between different physiological indicators in the drought stress of plants and screen the drought-resistant tree species to provide reference for the selection and ecological restoration of afforestation species in the lithoid hilly area of North China.

Key words： drought resistance membership function grey correlation analysis lithoid hilly area of North China

Received: 10 May 2018

PACS:

S175.1

	Service

	E-mail this article
	Add to my bookshelf
	Add to citation manager
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	Articles by authors
	LI Zedong
	LI Yiran
	ZHOU Xiaoying
	ZHANG Ruming
	CHENG Tiantian
	ZHANG Yongtao

Cite this article:

LI Zedong,LI Yiran,ZHOU Xiaoying, et al. Drought resistance evaluation of three afforestation tree species in lithoid hilly area of North China[J]. SSWC, 2019, 17(5): 100-109.

URL:

http://journal12.magtechjournal.com/Jweb_stbc/EN/10.16843/j.sswc.2019.05.012 OR http://journal12.magtechjournal.com/Jweb_stbc/EN/Y2019/V17/I5/100

[1]	胡实,莫兴国,林忠辉. 未来气候情景下我国北方地区干旱时空变化趋势[J]. 干旱区地理,2015,38(2):239. HU Shi,MO Xingguo,LIN Zhonghui. Projections of spatial-temporal variation of drought in North China[J]. Arid Land Geography,2015,38(2):239.
[2]	李瑞雪,孙任洁,汪泰初,等. 植物抗旱性鉴定评价方法及抗旱机制研究进展[J]. 生物技术通报,2017,33(7):40. LI Ruixue,SUN Renjie,WANG Taichu,et al. Research progress on identification and evaluation methods and mechanism of drought resistance in plants[J]. Biotechnology Bulletin,2017,33(7):40.
[3]	许景伟,李传荣,马履一,等. 沿海防护林造林树种抗旱性的比较[J]. 北京林业大学学报,2007,29(1):166. XU Jingwei,LI Chuanrong,MA Lüyi, et al. Comparison in drought resistance of tree species in coastal protective forests[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2007, 29(1):166.
[4]	何雪银,文仁来,吴翠荣,等. 模糊隶属函数法对玉米苗期抗旱性的分析[J]. 西南农业学报,2008,21(1):52. HE Xueyin,WEN Renlai,WU Cuirong,et al. Analysis of maize drought resistance at seeding stage by fuzzy subordination method[J]. Southwest China Journal of Agricultural Sciences,2008,21(1):52.
[5]	李君,周守标,王春景,等. 野生和栽培马蹄金抗旱性比较及其抗旱机制初探[J]. 植物生态学报,2007,31(3):521. LI Jun,ZHOU Shoubiao,WANG Chunjing,et al. Comparative study of drought tolerance and tolerance mechanisms in wild and cultivated Dichondra repens[J]. Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology,2007,31(3):521.
[6]	杨吉华,张永涛,孙明高,等. 石灰岩丘陵土壤旱作保水技术的研究[J]. 水土保持学报,2000,14(3):62. YANG Jihua,ZHANG Yongtao,SUN Minggao,et al. Study on technique of dry farming and water retention in limestone hill[J]. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation,2000,14(3):62.
[7]	杨程. 华北石质山区植被恢复途径的探讨[J]. 长春大学学报,2008,18(6):95. YANG Cheng. Discussion on restoration of vegetation in stony mountain area of North China[J]. Journal of Changchun University,2008,18(6):95.
[8]	李凯荣,张光灿. 水土保持林学[M]. 北京:科学出版社,2012:47. LI Kairong,ZHANG Guangcan. Soil and water conservation forestry[M]. Beijing:Science Press,2012:95.
[9]	武德. 绒毛白蜡种苗耐盐碱性研究[D]. 山东泰安:山东农业大学,2007:18. WU De.Study on safine-alkali tolerance of seeds and seedlings of Fraxins veluana Torr.[D]. Tai'an,Shandong:Shandong Agricultural University,2007:18.
[10]	陈丽培,刘瑞霞,杨玉珍,等. 干旱胁迫对刺槐、皂荚叶片渗透调节物质含量及保护酶活性的影响[J]. 河南农业科学,2017,46(10):128. CHEN Lipei,LIU Ruixia,YANG Yuzhen,et al. Effects of drought stress on osmotic adjustment substances content and activity of protect enzymes in the leaves of Robinia pseudoacacia and Gleditsia sinensis[J]. Journal of Henan Agricultural Sciences,2017,46(10):122.
[11]	董斌. 天敌昆虫在泰山主要林木害虫防治中的应用技术研究[D]. 山东泰安:山东农业大学,2011:11. DONG Bin. Application of insect enimies in major forest pest control in Mount Tai.[D]. Taian,Shandong:Shandong Agricultural University,2011:11.
[12]	HSIAO T C,ACEVEDO E. Plant responses to water deficits,water-use efficiency,and drought resistance[J]. Agricultural Meteorology,1974,14(1):59.
[13]	庄丽,陈亚宁,陈明,等. 模糊隶属法在塔里木河荒漠植物抗旱性评价中的应用[J]. 干旱区地理,2005,28(3):367 ZHUANG Li,CHEN Yaning,CHEN Ming,et al. Evaluation on the drought-resistant capability of the riparian desert vegetation along the Tarim River,Xinjiang[J]. Arid Land Geography,2005,28(3):367.
[14]	吴晓丽,韩清芳,贾志宽. 不同紫花苜蓿几个抗旱指标的灰色关联分析[J]. 干旱地区农业研究,2008,26(3):100. WU Xiaoli,HAN Qingfang,JIA Zhikuan. Analysis on grey correlative of several drought resistance indexes of different Medicago sativa[J]. Agricultral Research in the Arid areas,2008,26(3):100.
[15]	许大全. 光合作用效率[M]. 上海:上海科学技术出版社,2002:43. XU Daquan. Photosynthesis efficiency[M]. Shanghai:Shanghai Science and Technology Press,2002:43.
[16]	FARQUHAR G D,SHARKEY T D. Stomatal conductance and photosynthesis[J]. Ann Rev Plant Physiol,1982,33:317.
[17]	钟卫平. 厦门市固定资产投资与产业结构灰色关联分析[J]. 中国市场,2013(36):24. ZHONG Weiping. Grey relational analysis of fixed assets investment and industrial structure in Xiamen City[J]. China Market,2013(36):24.
[18]	SHAO Hongbo,CHU Liye,JALEEL C A,et al. Understanding water deficit stress-induced changes in the basic metabolism of higher plants-biotechnologically and sustainably improving agriculture and the ecoenvironment in arid regions of the globe[J]. Critical Reviews in Biotechnology,2009,29(2):131.
[19]	孟林,杨宏新,毛培春,等. 偃麦草属植物种间苗期抗旱性评价[J]. 草业学报,2011, 20(5):34. MENG Lin,YANG Hongxin,MAO Peichun,et al. Assessment of interspecies drought resistance of Elytrigia at the seedling stage[J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica,2011,20(5):34.
[20]	孟鹏,李玉灵,张柏习,等. 沙地彰武松与樟子松苗木抗旱生理特性比较[J]. 林业科学,2010,46(12):56. MENG Peng,LI Yuling,ZHANG Baixi,et al. A comparative study on physiological characteristics of drought resistance of Pinus densiflora var. zhangwuensis and P.sylvestris var. mongolica in sandy soil[J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae,2010,46(12):56.
[21]	王宇超,王得祥,彭少兵,等. 干旱胁迫对木本滨藜生理特性的影响[J]. 林业科学,2010,46(1):61. WANG Yuchao,WANG Dexiang,PENG Shaobing,et al. Effects of drought stress on physiological characteristics of woody saltbush[J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae,2010,46(1):61.
[22]	宋家壮,李萍萍,付为国. 不同土壤水分对虉草光合生理特性的影响[J]. 江苏农业科学,2012,40(1):289. SONG Jiazhuang,LI Pingping,FU Weiguo. Effects of different soil moisture on photosynthetic physiological characteristics of Phalaris arundinacea[J]. Jiangsu Agricultural Sciences, 2012,40(1):289.
[23]	刘祖祺,张石诚. 植物抗性生理学[M]. 北京:中国农业出版社,1994:67. LIU Zuqi,ZHANG Shicheng. Plant resistance physiology[M]. Beijing:China Agricultural Publishing House,1994:67.
[24]	徐飞,郭卫华,徐伟红,等. 短期干旱和复水对麻栎幼苗光合及叶绿素荧光的影响[J]. 山东林业科技,2008,38(4):1. XU Fei,GUO Weihua,XU Weihong, et al. Effects of short-term drought and rewatering on photosynthesis and chlorophyll fluorescence of Quercus acutissima seedlings[J]. Shangdong Forestry Science and Technology,2008,38(4):1.
[25]	黄承玲,陈训,高贵龙. 3种高山杜鹃对持续干旱的生理响应及抗旱性评价[J]. 林业科学,2011,47(6):48. HUANG Chengling,CHEN Xun,GAO Guilong. Physiological response of seedlings of three azalea species of drought stress and evaluation of drought resistance[J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae,2011,47(6):48.
[26]	吴统贵,袁涛,王宗星,等. 两种消浪树种幼苗光合特性对模拟潮汐水淹的响应[J]. 植物研究,2012,32(5):615. WU Tonggui,YUAN Tao,WANG Zongxing, et al. Responses of photosynthetic characteristics of Hibiscus hamabo and Myrica cerifera seedlings to simulated tidal waterlogging[J]. Bulletin of Botanical Research,2012,32(5):615.
[27]	李昌晓. 三峡库区消落带适生树种在淹水变化条件下的生理生化适应性研究[D]. 重庆:西南大学,2006. LI Changxiao. Physiological and biochemical adaptability of suitable tree species in the fluctuating zone of the Three Gorges Reservoir Area under flooding conditions[D]. Chongqing:Southwest University,2006.
[28]	王新建,何威,杨淑红,等. 豫楸1号4种砧木嫁接苗对干旱胁迫的生理响应[J]. 林业科学,2008,44(5):31. Wang Xinjian,HE Wei,YANG Shuhong,et al. Physiological response to drought stress of four kinds of stocks grafted seedlings of Catalpa bungei cl.‘Yu-1’[J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae,2008,44(5):31.
[29]	柯世省,杨敏文. 水分胁迫对云锦杜鹃抗氧化系统和脂类过氧化的影响[J]. 园艺学报,2007,34(5):1217. KE Shixing,YANG Minwen. Effects of water stress on antioxidant system and lipid peroxidation in leaves of Rhododendron fortunei[J]. Acta Horticulturae Sinica,2007,34(5):1217.
[30]	喻晓丽,邸雪颖,宋丽萍. 水分胁迫对火炬树幼苗生长和生理特性的影响[J]. 林业科学,2007,43(11):57. YU Xiaoli,DI Xueying,SONG Liping. Effects of water stress on the growth and eco-physiology of seedlings of the Rhus typhina[J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae,2007,43(11):57.
[31]	HUANG Bingru,FRY J D. Root anatomical physiological and morphological responses to drought stress for tall fescue cultivars[J]. Crop Science,1998,38(4):1017.
[32]	马旭俊,朱大海. 植物超氧化物歧化酶(SOD)的研究进展[J]. 遗传,2003,25(2):225. MA Xujun,ZHU Dahai. Functional roles of the plant superoxide dismutase[J]. Hereditas,2003,25(2):225.
[33]	李霞,阎秀峰,于涛. 水分胁迫对黄檗幼苗保护酶活性及脂质过氧化作用的影响[J]. 应用生态学报,2005,16(12):2353. LI Xia,YAN Xiufeng,YU Tao. Effects of water stress on protective enzyme activities and lipid peroxidation in Phellodendron amurense seedlings[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology,2005,16(12):2353.