乌兰布和沙漠绿洲区典型农田防护林带风速流场数值模拟

doi:10.16843/j.sswc.2023.04.002

摘要
图/表
参考文献
相关文章 (8)

全文: HTML (1 KB)
输出: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

摘要研究不同结构配置林带前后流场分布和防护效应的差异，能够揭示林带的防风机理，为林带配置优化提供科学依据。以乌兰布和沙漠绿洲区4种配置林带（0.8H宽度林带、0.2H宽度林带、乔灌混交林带和无灌木对比林带，H代表林带高度）。对研究对象进行数值模拟，分析不同林带结构配置对林带风速流场特征、不同高度处的水平风速以及防护距离的影响。结果表明：气流在经过4条林带时均产生不同的速度分区，其中下部气流加速区和带后回流区受林带配置结构影响较大；在近地面0.1H高度处，0.8H宽度林带相较于0.2H宽度林带在带后1H范围内风速降低90.8%，带后回流强度增加55.2%，林带总体有效防护距离分别为17.8H和15.5H；乔灌混交林带相较于无灌木林带，带后1H范围内风速降低122.4%，回流强度增加15.9%，林带有效防护距离分别为21.5H和23.7H，对比无灌木林带减少2.2H。总之，较宽林带和乔灌混交林带能很好地改善林带后缘风速，抑制近地面气流加速作用，但也增强带后回流，缩短了林带有效防护距离，因此在林带配置中应根据不同位置合理规划。

	服务

	把本文推荐给朋友
	加入我的书架
	加入引用管理器
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	作者相关文章
	汪立韬
	肖辉杰
	辛智鸣
	贾肖肖
	杨玉丽

关键词 ：数值模拟, 农田防护林带, 疏透度, 水平风速, 防风效益, 沙漠绿洲区, 乌兰布和沙漠

Abstract：[Background] The structural configuration of shelterbelt is crucial to the protective effect of shelterbelt. In the current research on the windbreak effect of farmland shelterbelt, field wind speed observations are mostly used, which is complicated and laborious to measure, and the differences in the windbreak effects of different configurations of shelterbelts are not studied enough. Based on the numerical simulation of the wind speed field of the shelterbelt, this study analyzed the windbreak effect of different configurations of shelterbelts and the distribution characteristics of the wind speed field around the shelterbelt.[Methods] Four different configurations of shelterbelts (0.8H width shelterbelt, 0.2H width shelterbelt, the arbor-shrub mixed shelterbelt and shrub-free shelterbelt, H represents shelterbelt height) in the Ulan Buh Desert were used as study objects. The two-dimensional numerical simulation method was used to simulate the wind speed field around the shelterbelt, and verified with the wind speed measured in the field. The influence of different shelterbelt structures on the characteristics of the wind speed field around the shelterbelt, the horizontal wind speed at different heights, and the efficient protection distance of the shelterbelt was explored.[Results] 1) When the airflow passed through four shelterbelts with different structures and configurations, different speed zones were produced around them, which were respectively the speed lifting zone above the shelterbelt, the weak wind zone behind the shelterbelt, the lower airflow acceleration zone, the reflux zone and the airflow recovery zone behind the shelterbelt. The airflow acceleration zone and the reflux zone were greatly affected by the structure of the shelterbelt.2) The impact on airflow under different shelterbelt widths mainly occured behind the shelterbelt.At a height of 0.1H near the ground, compared with the 0.2H width shelterbelt, the wind speed decreased by 90.8% within 1H behind the shelterbelt and the reflux intensity increased by 55.2% behind the shelterbelt for the 0.8H width shelterbelt, and the efficient protection distance was 17.8H and 15.5H for the two shelterbelts, respectively, which decreased by 2.3H compared with the efficientprotection distance for the 0.2H width shelterbelt. 3) At the height of 0.1H, the wind speed in the arbor-shrub mixed shelterbelt decreased to 0 within 0.7H after the shelterbelt, while the shrub-free shelterbelt showed a significant acceleration of airflow and reached the maximum wind speed at 1H after the shelterbelt, which was about 70.5% of the initial wind speed. Compared with the shrub-free shelterbelt, the wind speed decreased by 122.4% and the reflux intensity increased by 15.9% in the post-shelterbelt 1H range in the arbor-shrub mixed shelterbelt, and the efficient protection distance of the shelterbelt was 21.5H and 23.7H, respectively, which was reduced by 2.2H compared with the shrub-free shelterbelt.[Conclusions] The wider shelterbelt and mixed shelterbelt of trees and shrubs can well improve the wind speed at the back edge of the shelterbelt and effectively suppress the acceleration of airflow near the ground, but also enhance the reflux behind the shelterbelt and shorten the efficient protection distance, so the shelterbelt configuration should be planned reasonably according to different locations.

Key words： numerical simulation farmland shelterbelt light penetrating porosity horizontal wind speed protective benefits the oases the Ulan Buh Desert

收稿日期: 2022-10-10

PACS:

S712

基金资助:国家自然科学基金"河套灌区典型农田防护林网对土壤水盐变化的影响"（31870706）；国家重点研发计划"荒漠绿洲防护林体系构建合作研究"（2019YFE0116500）

通讯作者: 肖辉杰(1978-),男,博士,教授,博士生导师。主要研究方向:防护林,生态恢复与绿洲生态。E-mail:herr_xiao@hotmail.com E-mail: herr_xiao@hotmail.com

作者简介: 汪立韬(1995-),男,硕士研究生。主要研究方向:林业生态工程。E-mail:wlt20160201@163.com

引用本文:

汪立韬, 肖辉杰, 辛智鸣, 贾肖肖, 杨玉丽. 乌兰布和沙漠绿洲区典型农田防护林带风速流场数值模拟[J]. 中国水土保持科学, 2023, 21(4): 11-19.
WANG Litao, XIAO Huijie, XIN Zhiming, JIA Xiaoxiao, YANG Yuli. Numerical simulation of wind speed field in the typical farmland shelterbelts in the oases of the Ulan Buh Desert. SSWC, 2023, 21(4): 11-19.

链接本文:

http://journal12.magtechjournal.com/Jweb_stbc/CN/10.16843/j.sswc.2023.04.002 或 http://journal12.magtechjournal.com/Jweb_stbc/CN/Y2023/V21/I4/11

[1]	于颖, 杨曦光, 范文义. 农田防护林防风效能的遥感评价[J]. 农业工程学报, 2016, 32(24):177. YU Ying, YANG Xiguang, FAN Wenyi. Efficiency evaluation of wind protection of windbreaks by remote sensing[J]. Transactions of the CSAE, 2016, 32(24):177.
[2]	MANICKATHAN L, DEFRAEVE T, ALLEGRINI J, et al. Comparative study of flow field and drag coefficient of model and small natural trees in a wind tunnel[J]. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 2018, 35:230.
[3]	KAISER H. Die Stromung an Windschutzstreifen[J]. Ber. Deut. Wetterdienstes, 1959, 7:36.
[4]	FANG F M, LIANG T C, CHUNG C Y, et al. On the simulation of flow around discrete coniferous trees[J]. Journal of the Chinese Institute of Engineers, 2015, 38(5):665.
[5]	BITOG J P, LEE I B, SHIN M H, et al. Numerical simulation of an array of fences in Saemangeum reclaimed land[J]. Atmospheric Environment, 2009, 43(30):4612.
[6]	ZHAN Kejie, LIU Shizeng, YANG Zihui, et al. Effects of sand-fixing and windbreak forests on wind flow:A synthesis of results from field experiments and numerical simulations[J]. Journal of Arid Land, 2017, 9(1):1.
[7]	包岩峰, 郝玉光, 赵英铭, 等. 基于风速流场分析的乌兰布和沙漠绿洲防护林防风效果研究[J]. 北京林业大学学报, 2020, 42(8):122. BAO Yanfeng, HAO Yuguang, ZHAO Yingming, et al.Windbreak effects of shelterbelts in oases of the Ulan Buh Desert based on the analysis of wind speed field[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2020, 42(8):122.
[8]	薄天利, 郑晓静. 防沙栅栏风洞实验的数值模拟[J]. 兰州大学学报, 2005(5):102. BO Tianli, ZHNEG Xiaojing. Numerical simulation on sand fence in wind tunnel experiment[J]. Journal of Lanzhou University, 2005(5):102.
[9]	唐朝胜, 刘世洪, 程杰仁, 等. 基于数值模拟的橡胶防护林防风效应探讨[J]. 西北林学院学报, 2017,32(2):79. TANG Chaosheng, LIU Shihong, CHENG Jieren, et al. Study on windbreak effect of rubber and protection forest based on numerical simulation[J]. Journal of Northwest Forestry University, 2017, 32(2):79.
[10]	WILSON J D. Numerical studies of flow through a windbreak[J]. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 1985, 21(2):119.
[11]	张雷, 董毅, 虞木奎, 等. 沿海防护林网防风效应数值模拟研究[J]. 中国农学通报, 2015, 31(28):34. ZHANG Lei, DONG Yi, YU Mukui, et al. Numerical simulation on windbreak effect of coastal shelterbelts nets[J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2015, 31(28):34.
[12]	TORITA H, SATOU H. Relationship between shelterbelt structure and mean wind reduction[J]. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 2007, 145(3/4):186.
[13]	罗凤敏, 辛智鸣, 高君亮, 等. 乌兰布和沙漠东北缘近地层风速和降尘量特征[J]. 农业工程学报, 2016, 32(24):147. LUO Fengmin, XIN Zhiming, GAO Junliang, et al. Characteristics of near-surface wind speed and sand-dust flux at northeast edge of Ulan Buh Desert[J]. Transactions of the CSAE, 2016, 32(24):147.
[14]	杨文斌,王晶莹,董慧龙,等.两行一带式乔木固沙林带风速流场和防风效果风洞试验[J].林业科学,2011,47(2):95. YANG Wenbin, WANG Jingying, DONG Huilong, et al. Windbreak effects and wind velocity flow field of low density forest with two-line-one-belt distribution patterns of single-belt scheme[J]. Scientia SilvaeSinicae, 2011, 47(2):95.
[15]	李雪琳, 马彦军, 马瑞, 等. 不同带宽的防风固沙林流场结构及防风效能风洞实验[J]. 中国沙漠, 2018, 38(5):936. LI Xuelin, MA Yanjun, MA Rui, et al.Wind flow field and windproof efficiency of shelterbelt in different width[J]. Journal of Desert Research, 2018,38(5):936.
[16]	杨文斌, 卢琦, 吴波, 等. 低覆盖度不同配置灌丛内风流结构与防风效果的风洞实验[J]. 中国沙漠, 2007,27(5):791. YANG Wenbin, LU Qi, WU Bo,et al. Wind tunnel experiment on wind flow structure and windbreak effect within low-covered shrubs under different arrangements[J]. Journal of Desert Research,2007,27(5):791.
[17]	杨学军, 郭立冬, 唐东芹. 基于数值模拟的防护林规划设计探讨[J]. 上海交通大学学报(农业科学版), 2010, 28(3):204. YANG Xuejun, GUO Lidong, TANG Dongqin. Windbreak planning and design based on numerical simulation[J]. Journal of Shanghai Jiaotong University(Agricultural Science), 2010, 28(3):204.
[18]	许栋, 申振东, 高喜峰, 等. 防风网透流风空气动力学特性大涡数值模拟研究[J]. 计算力学学报,2015,32(4):530. XU Dong, SHEN Zhendong, GAO Xifeng, et al. Investigation on the aerodynamic characteristics of the seepage wind through windbreak using large eddy simulation[J]. Chinese Journal of Computational Mechanics, 2015, 32(4):530.
[19]	WILSON J D. A second-order closure model for flow through vegetation[J]. Boundary-Layer Meteorology, 1988, 42(4):371.
[20]	周军莉, 王元, 张国强. 林带宽高比对防护效应的影响[J]. 建筑热能通风空调, 2005, 24(5):102. ZHOU Junli, WANG Yuan, ZHANG Guoqiang. The influence of the shelterbelt's ratio of width to height on protecting effect[J]. Building Energy & Environment, 2005, 24(5):102.
[21]	王元, 周军莉, 徐忠. 灌草与林带搭配条件下防护效应的数值模拟[J]. 应用生态学报, 2003, 14(3):359. WANG Yuan, ZHOU Junli, XU Zhong. Numerical simulation of flow fields through porous windbreak in shrubby zone[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2003, 14(3):359.
[22]	段娜, 刘芳, 徐军, 等. 乌兰布和沙漠不同结构防护林带的防风效能[J]. 科技导报, 2016, 34(18):125. DUAN Na, LIU Fang, XU Jun, et al.On defending effects of different forest belt structures in Ulan Buh Desert[J]. Science & Technology Review, 2016, 34(18):125.