重庆缙云山3种典型倒伏树木根土盘特征

doi:10.16843/j.sswc.2023.02.010

摘要
图/表
参考文献
相关文章 (0)

全文: HTML (1 KB)
输出: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS) 背景资料

文章导读

摘要根土盘是边坡林木力学分析建模和了解林木倒伏力学机制的重要模块。为实现基于植株地上部分易观测指标对根土盘几何参数的预测，以及分析根土盘形态特征的主要影响因子，对缙云山林地倒伏树木进行野外调查，统计杉木、润楠、大头茶的树高、冠高、冠幅、根土盘的迎风半径、背风半径、横向直径、根土盘深度、根系数量、地形坡度等指标，并对3种植物的根土盘根系抗拉强度进行测定，最终对调查数据进行统计拟合以及PCA分析。结果表明：1）大头茶具有最大的横向直径与最小的根土盘深度且表层根系数量多于杉木和润楠，根土盘整体呈宽浅圆盘状；杉木具有最小的横向直径与最大的根土盘深度且深层根系数量多于大头茶和润楠，根土盘整体呈窄深圆柱状；2）3种树木根土盘的横向直径、迎风半径、背风半径与胸径均呈较强的正相关关系（R²>0.452），根土盘深度与胸径的相关性则较弱（R²<0.047）；3） PCA分析结果显示根土盘横向直径与根系数量和地形坡度呈较强正相关关系，根土盘深度与冠幅、冠高比呈较强正相关关系。综合得出：通过胸径可以对横向直径、迎风半径、背风半径这些指标进行相对比较好的预测，对根土盘深度的预测则较差；倒伏株的根土盘形态主要受根土盘根系数量、冠高比等决定，较多的根系数量和较大的地形坡度导致更大的根土盘横向直径，冠高、冠幅比较大的树木，导致更大的根土盘深度。

	服务

	把本文推荐给朋友
	加入我的书架
	加入引用管理器
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	作者相关文章
	何相昌
	王云琦
	李通
	李耀明
	王余靖
	祁子寒
	李克文

关键词 ：林木倒伏, 根土盘, 根系抗拉强度, 根系附加黏聚力

Abstract：[Background] Root-soil plate is an important module for mechanical analysis and modeling of slope forest trees and understanding the mechanical mechanism of forest lodging. The purpose of this study is to predict the geometric parameters of root-soil plate based on the easily observed indexes of aboveground parts of plants, and to analyze the main influencing factors of the morphological characteristics of root-soil plate.[Methods] In this study, the field investigation was carried out on the lodging trees in the forest of Jinyun Mountain. The tree height, crown height, crown width, windward radius, leeward radius, lateral diameter, root-soil plate depth, root quantity and topographic slope of Cunninghamia lanceolata, Machilus nanmu and Gordonia acuminata were counted. The root tensile strengths of the root-soil plates of the three tree species were measured. Finally, the survey data were statistically fitted and PCA analysis was carried out.[Results] 1) G. acuminata had the largest lateral diameter and the smallest root-soil plate depth, and the number of surface roots was more than that of C. lanceolata and M. nanmu, and the whole root-soil plate of G. acuminata was in the shape of wide and shallow disc. C. lanceolata had the smallest lateral diameter and the largest root-soil plate depth, and the number of deep roots was more than that of G. acuminata and M. nanmu, and the whole root-soil plate of C. lanceolata was in the shape of narrow and deep cylinder. 2) The lateral diameter, windward radius and leeward radius of the root-soil plate of the three tree species had a strong positive correlation with the DBH (R²>0.452), while the correlation between the depth of the root-soil plate and the DBH was weak (R²<0.047). 3) The results of PCA analysis showed that there was a strong positive correlation between the lateral diameter of root-soil plate and the number of roots and topographic slope, and there was a strong positive correlation between the root-soil plate depth and the crown width and crown height ratio.[Conclusions] The indicators of the lateral diameter, windward radius and leeward radius can be predicted relatively well by the DBH, but the prediction of the depth of the root-soil plate is poor. The shapes of root-soil plates of lodging plants are mainly determined by the number of roots and the crown height ratio. More number of roots and larger topographic slope lead to greater lateral diameter of root-soil plate, and trees with larger crown height and crown width lead to greater root-soil plate depth.

Key words： tree lodging root-soil plate root tensile strength root additional cohesion

收稿日期: 2022-06-19

PACS:

S761

基金资助:国家自然科学基金"降雨条件下植物根系动态固土护坡效应研究"（31971726）

通讯作者: 王云琦(1979-),女,教授,博士生导师。主要研究方向:水土保持工程。E-mail:wangyunqi@bjfu.edu.cn E-mail: wangyunqi@bjfu.edu.cn

作者简介: 何相昌(1997-),男,硕士研究生。主要研究方向:水土保持工程。E-mail:culture1219@163.com

引用本文:

何相昌, 王云琦, 李通, 李耀明, 王余靖, 祁子寒, 李克文. 重庆缙云山3种典型倒伏树木根土盘特征[J]. 中国水土保持科学, 2023, 21(2): 74-82.
HE Xiangchang, WANG Yunqi, LI Tong, LI Yaoming, WANG Yujing, QI Zihan, LI Kewen. Root-soil plate characteristics of three typical lodging trees in Jinyun mountain, Chongqing. SSWC, 2023, 21(2): 74-82.

链接本文:

http://journal12.magtechjournal.com/Jweb_stbc/CN/10.16843/j.sswc.2023.02.010 或 http://journal12.magtechjournal.com/Jweb_stbc/CN/Y2023/V21/I2/74

[1]	徐鹏飞, 张厚江, 管成, 等. 树木风载及其安全性评估研究进展[J]. 世界林业研究, 2022, 35(3):14. XU Pengfei, ZHANG Houjiang, GUAN Cheng, et al. Research advances in tree wind load and its safety evaluation[J]. World Forestry Research, 2022, 35(3):14.
[2]	EVERHAM E. A comparison of methods for quantifying catastrophic wind damage to forests[M]. Wind and Trees, 1995:340.
[3]	GRAY W M. Strong association between west African rainfall and U.S. landfall of intense hurricanes[J]. Science, 1990, 249:1251.
[4]	李秀芬, 朱教君, 王庆礼, 等. 森林的风/雪灾害研究综述[J]. 生态学报, 2005, 25(1):10. LI Xiufen, ZHU Jiaojun, WANG Qingli, et al. Forest damage induced by wind/snow:A review[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2005, 25(1):10.
[5]	ALEXIS A, NICOLL B C. Modelling the anchorage of shallow-rooted trees[J]. Forestry, 2009(3):273.
[6]	GARDINER, B. A. Development of a GIS based wind risk system for British forestry[C]. International Conference on Wind Effects on Tres, 2003, 16.
[7]	QUINE C P. Assessing the risk of wind damage to forests:Practice and pitfalls[M]. Wind and Trees, 1995:379.
[8]	SCHMOECKEL J, KOTTMEIER C, ALDINGER E, et al. Windstorm LOTHAR:Orographic influences on storm damage in the black forest[C]. International Conference on Wind Effects on Trees, 2003, 18.
[9]	LI X, ZHU J, WANG Q, et al.Snow/wind damage in natural secondary forests in Liaodong mountainous regions of Liaoning province[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2004, 15(6):941.
[10]	OLIVER H R, MAYHEAD G J. Wind measurements in a pine forest during a destructive gale[J]. Forestry, 1974, 47(2):185.
[11]	PELTOLA H, KELLOMKI S, HASSINEN A, et al. Mechanical stability of Scots pine, Norway spruce and birch:An analysis of tree-pulling experiments in Finland[J]. Forest Ecology & Management, 2000, 135(1):143.
[12]	LIN X Z, ZHANG T B, WANG Y H. Countermeasures raising wind resistance of street trees[J]. Journal of Zhejiang Forestry College, 1999, 16(2):175.
[13]	VALINGER E, LUNDQVIST L, BONDESSON L. Assessing the risk of snow and wind damage from tree physical characteristics[J]. Forestry, 1993(3):249.
[14]	LI G, ZHANG J L, LU Y C. The bending stress analysis of 4 species of woods caused by wind pressure in coastal shelter forest[J]. Journal of Nanjing Forestry University, 1999, 23(4):76.
[15]	张平安, 唐崇袍, 黄天来.树木倒伏研究现状与展望[J].林业科技通讯, 2020(1):14. ZHANG Pingan, TANG Chongpao, HUANG Tianlai. Research status and prospect of tree lodging[J]. Forest Science and Technology, 2020(1):14.
[16]	OLOFSSON E, BLENNOW K. Decision support for identifying spruce forest stand edges with high probability of wind damage[J]. Forest Ecology & Management, 2005, 207(1/2):87.
[17]	BAKER C J. The development of a theoretical model for the windthrow of plants[J]. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 1995, 175(3):355.
[18]	DUPUY L, FOURCAUD T, STOKES A. A numerical investigation into the influence of soil type and root architecture on tree anchorage[J]. Plant & Soil, 2005, 278(1/2):119.
[19]	YANG M, DEFOSSEZ P, DANJON F, et al. Tree stability under wind:Simulating uprooting with root breakage using a finite element method[J]. Annals of Botany, 2014, 114(4):695.
[20]	王倩. 缙云山针阔混交林碳通量变化特征及影响因子研究[D]. 北京:北京林业大学, 2018:17. WANG Qian. Characteristics of carbon fluxes and their response to environmental factors in ecosystems of mixed coniferous and broad-leaved forests in Jinyun mountain[D]. Beijing:Beijing Forestry University, 2018:17.
[21]	及金楠, 吴智阳. 黄土高原土质边坡林木根系表观黏聚力空间异质性研究[J]. 北京林业大学学报, 2014, 36(4):6. JI Jinnan, WU Zhiyang.Analyses of plant root additional cohesion heterogeneity at loess slope on the Loess Plateau[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2014, 36(4):6.
[22]	顾东祥, 汤亮, 曹卫星, 等.基于图像分析方法的水稻根系形态特征指标的定量分析[J].作物学报, 2010, 36(5):810. GU Dongxiang, TANG Liang, CAO Weixing, et al. Quantitative analysis on root morphological characteristics based on image analysis method in rice[J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2010, 36(5):810.
[23]	TIEN H. W, WILLIAM P, MCKINNELL III, et al. Strength of tree roots and landslides on Prince of Wales Island, Alaska[J]. Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 1979, 16(1):19.
[24]	王余靖, 周利军, 王云琦, 等. 直剪试验中土体含水率对根系失效方式的影响[J].中国水土保持科学, 2021, 19(2):43. WANG Yujing, ZHOU Lijun, WANG Yunqi, et al. Effect of soil moisture content on root failure mode in direct shear test[J]. Science of Soil and Water Conservation, 2021, 19(2):43.
[25]	李笑寒, 黄力, 杨圣贺, 等.缙云山常绿阔叶林雪灾受损特征及影响因素[J].林业科学研究, 2017, 30(5):735. LI Xiaohan, HUANG Li, YANG Shenghe, et al. Patterns andfactors causing snow-induced forest damage in a subtropical evergreen broad-leaved forest on Jinyun mountain[J]. Forest Research, 2017, 30(5):735.
[26]	DANJON F, FOURCAUD T, BERT D. Root architecture and wind-firmness of mature Pinus pinaster[J]. New Phytologist, 2005, 168(2):387.
[27]	CODER K D. Root strength & tree anchorage[D]. Athens, GA:University of Georgia Warnell School of Forestry & Natural Resources Outreach Monograph WSFNR, 2010:10.
[28]	KOIZUMI A, OONUMA N, SASAKI Y, et al. Difference in uprooting resistance among coniferous species planted in soils of volcanic origin[J]. Journal of Forest Research, 2007, 12(3):237.
[29]	GUPTA A. Relative effectiveness of trees and shrubs on slope stability[J]. Electron. J. Geotech Eng, 2016, 21:737.