Changes in biomass and root-shoot ratio of individual Populus alba var. pyramidalis Bge. in oasis farmland shelterbelt
ZHAO Yingming1,2, LIU Minghu1, ZHOU Quanlai3, BAO Yanfeng2, CHENG Yiben4, LI Yanli5, YANG Wenbin2
1. Experimental Center of Desert Forestry, Chinese Academy of Forestry, Inner Mongolia Dengkou Desert Ecosystem Research Station, State Forestry and Grassland Administration, 015200, Dengkou, Inner Mongolia, China; 2. Institute of Desertification Studies, Chinese Academy of Forestry, 100091, Beijing, China; 3. Shenyang Institute of Applied Ecology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, 110000, Shenyang, China; 4. Beijing Forestry University, 100083, Beijing, China; 5. Institute of Agricultural Resources and Regional Planning, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, 100081, Beijing, China
Abstract：[Background] Research on the biomass root-shoot ratio of shelterbelts is conducive to understand the gravity pressure of underground root biomass and the spatial distribution of aboveground and underground biomass at different ages, so as to improve the structural stability of trees and ensure the sustainable development of ecological service function of shelterbelts. In order to explore the biomass accumulation process and the change trend of root-shoot ratio of farmland shelterbelts in oasis, this study was carried out.[Methods] This study took the 2 rows farm-canal-forest-road type farmland shelterbelt in the Yellow River irrigation oasis of Dengkou in Ulanbuh desert as the research object. Space was used to replace time, and biomass of different diameter classes in the same space was used to replace biomass of different age diameter classes. Because the forest belt was closely connected with the canal, road farmland, and the investigation could not destroy the infrastructure, the fixed quadrat investigation method was adopted for the biomass of lateral roots.[Results] 1) The aboveground and underground biomass of young forest in two-row canal shelterbelts were 15.212 kg and 6.539 kg,respectively,and the aboveground and underground biomass of half-mature,near-mature and mature forests increased by 8.77 times and 4.89 times,2.82 times and 2.59 times,1.65 times and 1.53 times,respectively. Seven biomass models were obtained. 2) The root-shoot ratio of biomass was in the order of young forest > half-mature forest > near-mature forest > mature forest,the average value was 24.35% and that for young forest was 43.67%. The root-shoot ratio of biomass of half-mature forest,near-mature forest and mature forest decreased by 1.79 times,1.10 times and 1.08 times,respectively,and one biomass root-shoot ratio model was acquired. 3) The average density of biomass of trunk was 393.81 kg/m3,and that of young forest was 375.02 kg/m3;half-mature forest decreased by 3.09%, and near-mature and mature forest increased by 3.37% and 22.38%,respectively. 4) The biomass density of main roots of young forest was 404.20 kg/m3. The biomass density of half-mature forest and near-mature forests decreased by 4.14% and 0.48% respectively,while that of mature forest increased by 22.38%. The root dry density ratios of young,half-mature,near-mature and mature forest were 1.08,1.07,1.03 and 0.79,respectively.[Conclusions] Under normal circumstances,both aboveground and underground biomass show an increasing trend with the increase of diameter at breast height (DBH),and the growth rate of aboveground biomass is much larger than that of underground biomass,the difference of biomass increases and the gap of growth rate decreases. With the increase of DBH,the root-shoot ratio of biomass tends a decreasing,and the decrease range is reduced. The biomass density of trunk firstly increases and later decreases with the increase of DBH, which is positively correlated with DBH. The biomass density of main roots decreases with DBH, which is negatively correlated with DBH.
赵英铭, 刘明虎, 周全来, 包岩峰, 程一本, 李艳丽, 杨文斌. 绿洲农田防护林单株新疆杨生物量及其根冠比变化[J]. 中国水土保持科学, 2020, 18(1): 35-41.
ZHAO Yingming, LIU Minghu, ZHOU Quanlai, BAO Yanfeng, CHENG Yiben, LI Yanli, YANG Wenbin. Changes in biomass and root-shoot ratio of individual Populus alba var. pyramidalis Bge. in oasis farmland shelterbelt. SSWC, 2020, 18(1): 35-41.
JU C,BURESH R J,WANG Z,et al. Root and shoot traits for rice varieties with higher grain yield and higher nitrogen use efficiency at lower nitrogen rates application[J]. Field Crops Research,2015,175(4):47.
[2]
FAN J,McCONKEY B,WANG H,et al. Root distribution by depth for temperate agricultural crops[J]. Field Crops Research,2016,189(3):68.
[3]
GE T,LIU C,YUAN H,et al. Tracking the photosynthesized carbon input into soil organic carbon pools in a rice soil fertilized with nitrogen[J]. Plant and Soil,2015,392(1/2):17.
[4]
XU W,CUI K,XU A,et al. Drought stress condition increases root to shoot ratio via alteration of carbohydrate partitioning and enzymatic activity in rice seedlings[J]. Acta Physiologiae Plantarum,2015,37(2):9.
[5]
FRANKLIN O,CAMBUI C A,GRUFFMAN L,et al. The carbon bonus of organic nitrogen enhances nitrogen use efficiency of plants[J]. Plant,Cell & Environment,2017,40(1):25.
[6]
WANG L,RUAN Y L. Shoot-root carbon allocation,sugar signaling and their coupling with nitrogen uptake and assimilation[J]. Functional Plant Biology,2016,43(2):105.
[7]
KOOYERS N J. The evolution of drought escape and avoidance in natural herbaceous populations[J]. Plant Science,2015,234(5):155.
[8]
FELLER C,FAVRE P,JANKA A,et al. Mathematical modeling of the dynamics of shoot-root interactions and resource partitioning in plant growth[J]. PloS One,2015,10(7):e0127905.
[9]
ZHANG H,SONG T,WANG K,et al. Influences of stand characteristics and environmental factors on forest biomass and root-shoot allocation in southwest China[J]. Ecological Engineering,2016(91):7.
[10]
HERZOG M,STRIKER G G,COLMER T D,et al. Mechanisms of waterlogging tolerance in wheat-a review of root and shoot physiology[J]. Plant,Cell & Environment,2016,39(5):1068.
[11]
王志刚,杨东慧. 林带冬季相立木疏透度及其设计方法的研究[J]. 中国沙漠,1998,18(1):89. WANG Zhigang,YANG Donghui. Studies on standing tree transmissivity and structure design method of shelter belt with winter facies[J]. Journal of Desert Research,1998,18(1):89.
[12]
毕晓丽,洪伟,吴承祯,等. 武夷山米楷种群生命表分析[J]. 热带亚热带植物学报,2001,9(3):243. BI Xiaoli,HONG Wei,WU Chengzhen,et al. Life table analysis of Castanopsis carlesii population in Wuyishan[J]. Journal of Tropical and Subtropical Botany,2001,9(3):243.
[13]
于大炮,周莉,董百丽,等. 长白山北坡岳桦种群结构及动态分析[J]. 生态学杂志,2004,23(5):30. YU Dapao,ZHOU Li,DONG Baili,et al. Structure and dynamics of Betula ermanii population on the northern slope of Changbai Mountain[J]. Chinese Journal of Ecology,2004,23(5):30.
[14]
杨宁,邹冬生,李建国,等. 衡阳盆地紫色土丘陵坡地主要植物群落自然恢复演替进程中种群生态位动态[J]. 水土保持通报,2010,30(4):87. YANG Ning,ZOU Dongsheng,LI Jianguo,et al. Niche dynamics of main plant communities in natural restoration succession process on sloping land with purple soils in Hengyang Basin[J]. Bulletin of Soil and Water Conservation,2010,30(4):87.
[15]
赵英铭,雷渊才,杨文斌,等. 绿洲农田防护林带根生物量调查方法[J]. 林业资源管理,2017(5):78. ZHAO Yingming,LEI Yuancai,YANG Wenbin,et al. Investigation method of root biomass of oasis farmland shelterbelt[J]. Forest Resources Management,2017(5):78.
[16]
赵英铭,雷渊才,杨文斌,等.农田防护林带主根生物量空间分布[J]. 中国农业科技导报,2018,20(9):86. ZHAO Yingming,LEI Yuancai,YANG Wenbin,et al. Spatial distribution of main root biomass of farmland shelterbelt[J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology,2018,20(9):86.
[17]
赵英铭,雷渊才,杨文斌,等. 节水型农田防护林侧根生物量增长偏极现象的研究[J]. 中国农业科技导报,2018,20(10):73. ZHAO Yingming,LEI Yuancai,YANG Wenbin,et al. Studies on lateral root biomass and growth inequality phenomenon in oasis water-saving shelterbelt[J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology,2018,20(10):73.
2020, Vol. 18 
