[an error occurred while processing this directive]
中华放射肿瘤学杂志
   2025年4月7日 星期一     首 页 |  期刊介绍  |  编 委 会  |  投稿指南  |  期刊订阅  |  广告合作  |  学术影响  |  收录情况  |  联系我们  |  English
中华放射肿瘤学杂志  2015, Vol. 24 Issue (5): 497-501    DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1004-4221.2015.05.005
胸部肿瘤 最新目录| 下期目录| 过刊浏览| 高级检索 [an error occurred while processing this directive]|[an error occurred while processing this directive]
3DCT、4DCT和PET-CT定义的胸段食管癌PTV比较研究
郭延娈, 李建彬, 李彦康, 王玮, 马志芳, 梁超前, 邢军, 段益利
250117 济南,山东省肿瘤医院放疗三病区(郭延娈、李建彬、王玮、马志芳、梁超前、邢军、段益利);济南大学山东省医学科学院医学与生命科学学院(郭延娈、段益利);山东大学医学院(李彦康)
A comparative study of planning target volumes based on three-dimensional computed tomography, four-dimensional computed tomography, and positron emission tomography-computed tomography in thoracic esophageal cancer
Guo Yanluan,Li Jianbin,Li Yankang,Wang Wei,Ma Zhifang,Liang Chaoqian,Xing Jun,Duan Yili
Department of Radiation Oncology,Shandong Cancer Hospital& Institute,Ji’nan 250117,China
全文: PDF (344 KB)   HTML (1 KB) 
输出: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      背景资料
摘要  目的 探讨基于PET-CT图像SUV≥2.5、20%或25%SUVmax与基于3DCT、4DCT构建的胸段食管癌PTV位置及体闫积差异性。方法 18例胸段食管癌患者序贯完成3DCT、4DCT、FDG PET-CT 胸部定位扫描。3DCT图像常规外扩获得PTV3D;PTV4D通过10个时相靶区融合获得;基于SUV≥2.5、20%或25%SUVmax分别得到IGTVPET2.5、IGTVPET20%、IGTVPET25%,分别将这3个靶区上下方向外扩3.5 cm,左右前后方向外扩1 cm得到PTVPET2.5、PTVPET20%、PTVPET25%。结果 PTV3D体积显著大于PTV4D和PTVPET(P=0.000~0.044),而PTVPET和PTV4D相近(P=0.216~0.633)。PTV3D、PTV4D相互间DI分别为0.70、0.95,同三维运动矢量呈负相关(P=0.039)。PTVPET2.5、PTVPET20%、PTVPET25%相互间DI分别为0.74、0.72、0.78、0.73、0.77、0.70,同三维运动矢量无相关性(P=0.150~0.822)。PTV3D、PTVPET间相互DI分别为0.86、0.84、0.88、0.63、0.67、0.59。结论 由于各自所包含的靶区信息差异等原因,基于3DCT、4DCT及PET-CT构建的胸段食管癌PTV在空间上很难达到完全重合。利用自由呼吸状态下PET扫描图像来构建胸段食管癌PTV尚需慎重。
服务
把本文推荐给朋友
加入我的书架
加入引用管理器
E-mail Alert
RSS
作者相关文章
郭延娈
李建彬
李彦康
王玮
马志芳
梁超前
邢军
段益利
关键词 体层摄影术X线计算机三维体层摄影术X线计算机四维体层摄影术正电子发射氟脱氧葡萄糖计划靶体积食管肿瘤/放射疗法    
Abstract:Objective To investigate the differences in position and volume between planning target volumes (PTV) based on positron emission tomography-computed tomography (PET-CT) images with an standardized uptake value (SUV) no less than 2.5, 20% of the maximum SUV (SUVmax), or 25% of SUVmax, three-dimensional (3D) CT, and four-dimensional (4D) CT in thoracic esophageal cancer. Methods Eighteen patients with thoracic esophageal cancer sequentially received chest 3DCT, 4DCT, and[18F]fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose (FDG) PET-CT scans. PTV3D was obtained by conventional expansion of 3DCT images;PTV4D was obtained by fusion of target volumes from 10 phases of 4DCT images. The internal gross tumor volumes (IGTV), IGTVPET2.5, IGTVPET20%, and IGTVPET25%, were generated based on PET-CT images with an SUV no less than 2.5, 20% of SUVmax, and 25% of SUVmax, respectively. These IGTVs were expanded longitudinally by 3.5 cm and radically by 1 cm to make PTVPET2.5, PTVPET20%, and PTVPET25%, respectively. Results PTV3D was significantly larger than both PTV4D and PTVPET(P=0.000-0.044), while there was no significant difference between PTV4D and PTVPET(P=0.216-0.633). The mutual degrees of inclusion (DIs) between PTV3D and PTV4D were 0.70 and 0.95, respectively, which were negatively correlated with 3D-Vector (P=0.039). The mutual DIs between PTVPET2.5, PTVPET20%, and PTVPET25% were 0.74, 0.72, 0.78, 0.73, 0.77, and 0.70, respectively, which showed no correlation with 3D-Vector (P=0.150-0.822). The mutual DIs between PTV3D and PTVPET were 0.86, 0.84, 0.88, 0.63, 0.67, and 0.59, respectively. Conclusions It is difficult to achieve complete volumetric overlap of PTVs based on 3DCT, 4DCT and PET-CT in thoracic esophageal cancer due to different target volume information. PET scan during free breathing should be used with caution to generate PTVs in thoracic esophageal cancer.
Key wordsTomography,X-ray computed,three-dimensional    Tomography,X-ray computed,four-dimensional    Tomography, positron-emission, fluorodeoxyglucose    Planning target volume    Esophageal neoplasms/radiotherapy   
    
通讯作者: 李建彬,E-mail:lijianbin@msn.com   
引用本文:   
郭延娈,李建彬,李彦康等. 3DCT、4DCT和PET-CT定义的胸段食管癌PTV比较研究[J]. 中华放射肿瘤学杂志, 2015, 24(5): 497-501.
Guo Yanluan,Li Jianbin,Li Yankang et al. A comparative study of planning target volumes based on three-dimensional computed tomography, four-dimensional computed tomography, and positron emission tomography-computed tomography in thoracic esophageal cancer[J]. Chinese Journal of Radiation Oncology, 2015, 24(5): 497-501.
链接本文:  
http://journal12.magtechjournal.com/Jweb_fszlx/CN/10.3760/cma.j.issn.1004-4221.2015.05.005     或     http://journal12.magtechjournal.com/Jweb_fszlx/CN/Y2015/V24/I5/497
京公网安备11010502022167号
版权所有 © 2010《中华放射肿瘤学杂志》编辑部
地址:北京朝阳区潘学园南里17号 中国医学科学院肿瘤医院(100021)
电话:010-67700737,87788294 Email: cjron@cmaph.org
本系统由北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司设计开发 技术支持:Support@magtech.com.cn