情报科学 ›› 2024, Vol. 42 ›› Issue (6): 154-163.

• 业务研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

合作博弈视角下数字平台数据互操作制度研究

  

  • 出版日期:2023-06-01 发布日期:2024-07-31

  • Online:2023-06-01 Published:2024-07-31

摘要: 【 目的/意义】良性的数据互操作可以打破数据孤岛、降低市场进入壁垒,对于促进数据流通、数字经济良性 竞争与创新,具有重要的积极作用。通过探究数据互操作的实施困境及域外有益经验,以期探索适合我国的实施 路径。【方法/过程】首先基于非合作博弈视角分析数据互操作的实施困境,进而转向合作博弈理论,并以欧盟《数据 法》为重点样本,研究不同方案成本收益的差异,以揭示数据互操作实施的优化方案。【结果/结论】我国在推动数据 互操作的宏观制度设计方面,应坚持促进参与方利益最大化的原则,通过制定有约束力的协议,特别是在标准化规 则制定与数据投资激励保障方面,同时建立行业自律与国家监管并行的监管模式。【创新/局限】运用合作博弈理 论,基于欧盟《数据法》这一示例,结合量化分析结果探索更优的数据互操作实施路径。不过由于《数据法》的评估 是基于欧盟的实践情况,我国数据互操作规则的实证分析还需结合相关实际数据展开。

Abstract: 【 Purpose/significance】 Benign data interoperability can break data silos and lower market entry barriers, playing an impor⁃ tant positive role in promoting data circulation, benign competition and innovation in the digital economy. By exploring the implemen⁃ tation dilemma of data interoperability and beneficial experiences from other fields, we aim to explore an implementation path suitable for China.【 Method/process】 First, we analyze the implementation dilemma of data interoperability from a non-cooperative game per⁃ spective, and then turn to cooperative game theory. Taking the EU Data Act as a key sample, we study the differences in costs and ben⁃ efits of different schemes to reveal the optimal solution for implementing data interoperability.【 Results/conclusions】 In promoting the macro institutional design of data interoperability in China, we should adhere to the principle of maximizing the interests of partici⁃ pants, formulate binding agreements, especially in standardization rules and data investment incentive guarantees, and establish a par⁃ allel model of industry self-discipline and national supervision. 【Innovation/limitation】 By applying game theory, based on the ex⁃ ample from EU Data Law, and combining with quantitative analysis results, this study explores a better path for implementing data in⁃ teroperability. However, since the evaluation of the Data Act is based on the EU′s practical situation, the empirical analysis of China′s data interoperability rules still needs to be carried out in combination with relevant actual data.