Abstract: 【Purpose/significance】Whether the paper is disruptive and how disruptive it is has always received extensive attention from people from all walks of life, and the scientific measurement of the disruptiveness of the paper is particularly urgent and important in the context of "breaking the five-only" and vigorously promoting the evaluation of representative works in China.【Method/process】 Based on the three basic ideas of "weighted citation", "integration of science and technology" and "citation identity", this study opti⁃ mizes the traditional disruptive index from three levels: paper citation, paper-patent citation, and citation comment content, and con⁃ structs a more comprehensive and scientific disruptive index. Taking the "Milestone Paper" selected by the American Physical Society as a sample, the empirical research was carried out from the two aspects of "optimization model and other mainstream indicator mod⁃ els" and "comprehensive index and single index", and explores the measurement effect of the optimization model on the disruptive of the paper【. Result/conclusion】The optimization model fully reflects the "high academic recognition", the design principle is scientific; compared with other mainstream indicator models, the optimization model has higher degree of differentiation; the comprehensive opti⁃ mization model is more scientific and reasonable than the single index.【Innovation/limitation】From the perspective of multiple sources, a new index model of paper disruptive measurement is proposed. In fields other than the natural sciences, using the highlevel identity ideas to carry out disruptive analysis of academic achievements needs to be further studied.