|
|
Spatio-temporal pattern change of land use based on fractal theory: Taking Jialing River basin as an example |
GUO Xingyue1, WANG Tian1,2, CHENG Shengdong1, LI Zhanbin1,2, ZHANG Jiao1, LI Peng1,2 |
1. State Key Laboratory of Eco-hydraulics in Northwest Arid Region, Xi'an University of Technology, 710048, Xi'an, China; 2. Key Laboratory of National Forestry Administration on Ecological Hydrology and Disaster Prevention in Arid Regions, Xi'an University of Technology, 710048, Xi'an, China |
|
|
Abstract [Background] Land use type is an important indicator to quantitatively predict the degree of soil erosion, which reflects the situation of soil and water loss in the basin to a certain extent. Its change process directly reflects the interaction between human activities and the natural environment. Over the years, scholars have constantly innovated research methods and models to explore the law of land use change. This study discusses the temporal and spatial change pattern of land use from the perspective of fractal theory, and provides scientific reference for future watershed soil and water conservation planning.[Methods] Based on fractal theory, Jialing River basin was selected as the research object. By calculating the land use conversion matrix from 1990 to 2005 and from 2005 to 2020, we calculated the fractal dimension and stability index of the whole basin and different land uses in the third phase, and established a regression model. Further we analyzed the transformation of area and the stability of spatial pattern, and deeply explored the changes of spatial and temporal pattern of land use in 1990, 2005 and 2020 to clarify the rules of land use structure change and evolution transformation. [Results] From 1990 to 2020, the area of cultivated land and grassland decreased, and the area of woodland, waters, construction land and unused land increased. The number of patches in the overall land use type decreased, and the average patch area showed an upward trend. The number of patches of the overall land use type showed a downward trend, and the average patch area showed an upward trend. The average patch area of woodland increased the most, 11.81 hm2, and the average patch area of grassland increased the least, 0.74 hm2. The number of patches of cultivated land, woodland, grassland, waters and unused land showed a downward trend, while the number of patches of construction land only showed an upward trend, of which the number of patches of woodland decreased the most, by 591 833, and the number of patches of construction land increased the most, by 15 130. The fractal dimensions of the overall land use in 1990, 2005 and 2020 were 1.486 3, 1.497 2 and 1.514 2 respectively, rising gradually. The internal self similarity of the Jialing River basin weakened, and the patch shape developed toward an irregular state. The fractal dimensions of cultivated land, woodland, grassland, waters and construction land increased year by year. The fractal dimensions of unused land decreased first and then increased. The fragmentation of polygon patches of most land use types increased, fragmentation was serious, nesting structures became more complex, and spatial structure stability decreased. [Conclusions] Influenced by the "Changzhi" project and the policy of returning farmland to forests, the land use in the Jialing River region has changed greatly from 1990 to 2020 due to human activities. The overall fractal dimension of land use has gradually increased, the self similarity within the watershed has weakened, the patch shape has developed towards an irregular state, the nested structure of polygon patches has become complex, and the stability of spatial structure has decreased.
|
Received: 16 March 2022
|
|
|
|
|
[1] |
王夏晖, 何军, 牟雪洁, 等. 中国生态保护修复20年:回顾与展望[J]. 中国环境管理, 2021, 13(5):85. WANG Xiahui, HE Jun, MOU Xuejie, et al. 20 years of ecological protection and restoration in China:Review and prospect[J]. Chinese Journal of Environmental Management, 2021, 13(5):85.
|
[2] |
符素华, 刘宝元. 土壤侵蚀量预报模型研究进展[J]. 地球科学进展, 2002(1):78. FU Suhua, LIU Baoyuan. Evolution of soil erosion model[J]. Advances in Earth Science, 2002(1):78.
|
[3] |
李占斌, 朱冰冰, 李鹏. 土壤侵蚀与水土保持研究进展[J]. 土壤学报, 2008, 45(5):802. LI Zhanbin, ZHU Bingbing, LI Peng. Advancement in study on soil erosion and soil and water conservation[J]. Acta Pedologica Sinica, 2008, 45(5):802.
|
[4] |
周珂, 杨永清, 张俨娜, 等. 光学遥感影像土地利用分类方法综述[J]. 科学技术与工程, 2021, 21(32):13603. ZHOU Ke, YANG Yongqing, ZHANG Yanna, et al. Review of land use classification methods based on optical remote sensing images[J]. Science Technology and Engineering, 2021, 21(32):13603.
|
[5] |
宋戈, 王盼盼. 松嫩高平原县域土地利用空间格局地形梯度特征分析:以巴彦县为例[J]. 地理科学, 2017, 37(8):1218. SONG Ge, WANG Panpan. Spatial pattern of land use along the terrain gradient of county in Songnen High Plain:A case study of Bayan county[J]. Scientia Geographica Sinica, 2017, 37(8):1218.
|
[6] |
沈中原, 李占斌, 武金慧, 等. 基于GIS的流域土地利用/土地覆被分形特征[J]. 农业工程学报, 2008(8):63. SHEN Zhongyuan, LI Zhanbin, WU Jinhui, et al. Fractal characteristics of regional land use/land cover based on GIS technique[J]. Transactions of the CSAE, 2008(8):63.
|
[7] |
谢叶伟, 刘兆刚, 赵军, 等. 基于RS与GIS的典型黑土区土地利用变化分析:以海伦市为例[J]. 地理科学, 2010, 30(3):428. XIE Yewei, LIU Zhaogang, ZHAO Jun, et al. Analysis of landuse dynamic in typical blacksoil region based on GIS and RS[J]. Acta Geographic Sinica, 2010, 30(3):428.
|
[8] |
摆万奇, 孙会首, 阎建忠. 大渡河上游地区土地覆被动态变化的尺度效应[J]. 自然资源学报, 2009, 24(2):335. BAI Wanqi, SUN Huishou, YAN Jianzhong. The scale effect of land cover dynamics in the upper reaches of the Dadu River[J]. Journal of Natural Resources, 2009, 24(2):335.
|
[9] |
吴涟敏, 廖善刚. 基于GIS和分形理论的土地利用空间格局分析:以闽侯县为例[J]. 地球环境学报, 2019, 10(2):156. WU Lianmin, LIAO Shangang. Spatial pattern analysis of land use in Minhou county, Fujian province of China on the basis of GIS and fractal theory[J]. Journal of Earth Environment, 2019, 10(2):156.
|
[10] |
丁剑宏, 谢飞帆, 陈丽. 滇池流域土壤侵蚀空间结构的分形特征分析[J]. 中国水土保持, 2011(1):43. DING Jianhong, XIE Feifan, CHEN Li. Fractal characteristics of spatial structure of soil erosion in Dianchi Basin[J]. Soil and Water Conservation in China, 2011(1):43.
|
[11] |
郄瑞卿, 刘富民. 基于分形理论的土地利用景观格局变化研究:以镇赉县镇赉镇为例[J]. 水土保持研究, 2013, 20(2):217. YING Ruiqing, LIU Fumin. Study on changes in landscape pattern of landuse based on fractal theory:A case study of Zhenlai town of Zhenlai county[J]. Research of Soil and Water Conservation, 2013, 20(2):217.
|
[12] |
汪涛, 黄子杰, 吴昌广, 等. 基于分形理论的三峡库区土壤侵蚀空间格局变化[J]. 中国水土保持科学, 2011, 9(2):47. WANG Tao, HUANG Zijie, WU Changguang, et al. Spatial pattern variation of soil erosion in Three Gorges Reservoir Area based on fractal theory[J]. Science of Soil and Water Conservation, 2011, 9(2):47.
|
[13] |
张继平, 常学礼, 李健英, 等. 基于3S的农牧交错区耕地动态变化研究:以内蒙古奈曼旗为例[J]. 干旱区资源与环境, 2008,22(5):25. ZHANG Jiping, CHANG Xueli, LI Jianying, et al. Temporal and spatial changing of cropland in farming-pastural zone:A case study of Naimanqi Inner Mongolia[J]. Journal of Arid Land Resources and Environment, 2008,22(5):25.
|
[14] |
齐师杰, 张行南, 夏达忠, 等. 嘉陵江流域土地利用/覆被变化特征及其驱动力分析[J]. 长江科学院院报, 2013, 30(1):1. QI Shijie, ZHANG Xingnan, XIA Dazhong, et al.Characteristics and driving forces of land use/cover change in Jialingjiang River Basin[J]. Journal of Yangtze River Scientific Research Institute, 2013, 30(1):1.
|
[15] |
杨振奇, 郭建英, 秦富仓, 等. 裸露砒砂岩区小流域土壤侵蚀空间自相关特征及影响因素[J]. 水土保持通报, 2021, 41(2):58. YANG Zhenqi, GUO Jianying, QIN Fucang, et al. Spatial autocorrelation patterns and influencing factors of soil erosion of small watershed in bare feldspathic sandstone region[J]. Bulletin of Soil and Water Conservation, 2021, 41(2):58.
|
[16] |
孔雪松, 陈俊励, 王静, 等. 耦合土地利用格局与过程变化的生态干扰评价:以长三角地区为例[J]. 地理科学, 2021, 41(11):2031. KONG Xuesong, CHEN Junli, WANG Jing, et al. Evaluation of ecological disturbance coupling land use pattern and process change:Taking the Yangtze River Delta as an example[J]. Scientia Geographica Sinica, 2021, 41(11):2031.
|
[17] |
白桦, 穆兴民, 高鹏, 等. 嘉陵江流域降水及径流演变规律分析[J]. 水土保持研究, 2012, 19(1):102. BAI Hua, MU Xingmin, GAO Peng, et al. Analysis onspatio-temporal variation of precipitation and streamflow in the Jialingjiang River Basin[J]. Research of Soil and Water Conservation, 2012, 19(1):102.
|
|
|
|