基于2次全国制图的土壤可蚀性因子变化趋势

doi:10.16843/j.sswc.2023021

Abstract
Figure/Table
References
Related Citation (15)

Download: PDF (810 KB) HTML (1 KB)
Export: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

Abstract [Background] The soil erodibility (K factor) is one of the key factors in calculating soil erosion modulus using the Chinese soil loss equation (CSLE). Therefore, obtaining an accurate distribution map of K factor is necessary for the national monitoring of soil and water loss in China. The current available Chinese K factor map was made during the soil and water conservation measures survey in the first national census in 2011, based on soil type maps of provinces (autonomous regions and municipalities) and soil profile data from the second national soil survey (K value in version 2011 for short). It is necessary to update the K value in the version 2011 and study the changing characteristics of K factor from the version 2011 to the version 2022 (see below). [Methods] In order to increase the accuracy and reliability of soil erosion assessment, an updated K factor map was completed in 2022, using the random forest prediction method and soil profile data from the "Investigation of Chinese Soil Series" (K value in version 2022 for short). The K factor maps in the version 2011 and 2022 were chosen as the research projects, and their value size and spatial distribution in the major river basins and soil type of China were compared. [Results] 1) The mean value of the national K value in the version 2022 (0.029 8 t·hm²·h/(MJ·mm·hm²)) was slightly lower than that in the version 2011 (0.032 3 t·hm²·h/(MJ·mm·hm²)), indicating a positive trend in the development of soil erosion control in China. Except for the Haihe River Basin and Songliao River Basin, the K value in the version 2022 in each basin increased when compared to the K value in the version 2011. Among them, the K factor of castanozems, dark brown earths, saline soils and other soil type decreased the most, while the K factor of fluvo aquic soils, cinnamon soils, yellow earths and other types of soil increased. 2) The trend of changes in the national mean value of K factor was consistent with the dynamic trend of a decrease in the area and degree of soil erosion nationwide. The decrease in K factor was mainly related to reasons such as Returning Farmland to Forests and soil amendment, while the increase in K factor was related to intensive cultivation and slope erosion. [Conclusions] This study may provide a basis for dynamic monitoring of soil erosion and evaluation of the effectiveness of soil and water conservation management. In the future, it is necessary to strengthen ecological protection, improve soil quality and its ability to resist erosion.

Key words： K factor CSLE water erosion dynamic monitoring changing trend

Received: 20 February 2023

PACS:

S157.1

	Service

	E-mail this article
	Add to my bookshelf
	Add to citation manager
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	Articles by authors
	ZHAO Yuan
	TIAN Zhiyuan
	LIANG Yin
	ZHAO Yan

Cite this article:

ZHAO Yuan,TIAN Zhiyuan,LIANG Yin, et al. Changing trend of soil erodibility factor based on two national mappings of it[J]. SSWC, 2024, 22(4): 146-151.

URL:

http://journal12.magtechjournal.com/Jweb_stbc/EN/10.16843/j.sswc.2023021 OR http://journal12.magtechjournal.com/Jweb_stbc/EN/Y2024/V22/I4/146

[1]	水利部印发《全国水土流失动态监测规划(2018—2022年)》和《国家水土保持监管规划(2018—2020年)》[J]. 中国水土保持, 2018(4):27. The Ministry of Water Resources issued the National Dynamic Monitoring Plan for Water and Soil Loss (2018—2022) and the National Monitoring Plan for Water and Soil Conservation (2018—2020)[J]. Soil and Water Conservation in China, 2018(4):27.
[2]	WISCHMEIER W H. A soil erodibility nomograph for farmland and construction sites[J]. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 1971, 26(5):189.
[3]	梁音, 刘宪春, 曹龙熹, 等. 中国水蚀区土壤可蚀性K值计算与宏观分布[J]. 中国水土保持, 2013(10):35. LIANG Yin, LIU Xianchun, CAO Longxi, et al.K value calculation of soil erodibility of China water erosion areas and its macro-distribution[J]. Soil and Water Conservation in China, 2013(10):35.
[4]	田芷源, 梁音, 赵院, 等. 中国水蚀区土壤可蚀性因子更新方法与应用[J]. 中国水土保持科学, 2023, 21(6):63. TIAN Zhiyuan, LIANG Yin, ZHAO Yuan, et al. Updating method of soil erodibility factor in water-erosion areas of China and its application[J]. Science of Soil and Water Conservation, 2023, 21(6):63.
[5]	张甘霖, 王秋兵, 张凤荣, 等.中国土壤系统分类土族和土系划分标准[J]. 土壤学报, 2013, 50(4):826. ZHANG Ganlin, WANG Qiubing, ZHANG Fengrong, et al. Criteria for establishment of soil family and soil series in Chinese soil taxonomy[J]. Acta Pedologica Sinica, 2013, 50(4):826.
[6]	BREIMAN L. Random forests[J]. Machine Learning, 2001, 45(1):5.
[7]	TIAN Zhiyuan, LIU Feng, LIANG Yin, et al. Mapping soil erodibility in southeast China at 250 m resolution: Using environmental variables and random forest regression with limited samples[J]. International Soil and Water Conservation Research, 2022, 10:62.
[8]	杨佳钦, 余明. 基于GIS和RUSLE模型的台湾石门水库集水区的水土侵蚀监测[J]. 亚热带资源与环境学报, 2018, 13(2):44. YANG Jiaqin, YU Ming. Study of the monitoring soil erosion of the Shimen Reservoir Watershed in Taiwan based on RUSLE model and GIS[J]. Journal of Subtropical Resources and Environment, 2018, 13(2):44.
[9]	陈俊元, 王筌, 简士濠. 台湾屏东地区土壤可蚀性因子分布及适用性之探讨[R]. 海峡两岸水土保持学术研讨会. 台湾中兴:中国水土保持学会, 2016: 295. CHEN Junyuan, WANG Quan, JIAN Shihao. Distribution and applicability of soil erodibility factors in Pingtung, Taiwan[R]. Cross Strait Symposium of Soil and Water Conservation. Zhongxing, Taiwan: Chinese Society of Soil of Water Conservation, 2016: 295.
[10]	蔡强国, 范昊明, 沈波. 松辽流域土壤侵蚀危险性分析与防治对策研究[J]. 水土保持学报, 2003, 17(3):21. CAI Qiangguo, FAN Haoming, SHEN Bo. Research on danger of soil erosion and prevention and cure strategy for Songhua River and Liao River Valley[J]. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 2003, 17(3):21.
[11]	张玉刚, 卢慧中, 曹龙熹, 等. 太湖流域片土壤侵蚀现状与变化[J]. 中国水土保持科学, 2016, 14(3):26. ZHANG Yugang, LU Huizhong, CAO Longxi, et al. Soil erosion situation and changing trend in the Taihu Lake basin, southeastern China[J]. Science of Soil and Water Conservation, 2016, 14(3):26.
[12]	陈羽璇, 杨勤科, 刘宝元, 等. 基于CSLE模型的珠江流域土壤侵蚀强度评价[J]. 中国水土保持科学, 2021, 19(6):86. CHEN Yuxuan, YANG Qinke, LIU Baoyuan, et al. Assessment of soil erosion intensity in Pearl River Basin based on CSLE model[J]. Science of Soil and Water Conservation, 2021, 19(6):86.
[13]	邓良基, 侯大斌, 王昌全, 等. 四川自然土壤和旱耕地土壤可蚀性特征研究[J]. 中国水土保持, 2003(7):23. DENG Liangji, HOU Dabin, WANG Changquan, et al. Study on characteristics of erodibility of natural soil and non-irrigated soil of Sichuan[J]. Soil and Water Conservation in China, 2003(7):23.
[14]	张高玲, 谢红霞, 盛浩, 等. 亚热带山区红壤可蚀性对土地利用变化的响应[J]. 长江科学院院报, 2022, 39(2):63. ZHANG Gaoling, XIE Hongxia, SHENG Hao, et al. Erodibility of red soil in subtropical hilly region in response to land use change[J]. Journal of Yangtze River Scientific Research Institute, 2022, 39(2):63.
[15]	高日平, 赵沛义, 刘小月, 等. 长期施肥对农牧交错带栗钙土土壤理化性质及生物学特性的影响[J]. 生态学杂志, 2023, 42(3):552. GAO Riping, ZHAO Peiyi, LIU Xiaoyue, et al. Effects of long-term fertilization on soil physicochemical and biological properties of chestnut calcareous soil in agro-pastoral ecotone[J]. Chinese Journal of Ecology, 2023, 42(3):552.
[16]	杨淼焱, 杨小燕, 马燕娥, 等. 退耕还林后黑土表层土壤可蚀性动态变化[J]. 东北林业大学学报, 2014, 42(12):98. YANG Miaoyan, YANG Xiaoyan, MA Yan'e, et al. Dynamics of topsoil erodibility during converting farmland to forest in black soil[J]. Journal of Northeast Forestry University, 2014, 42(12):98.
[17]	朱冰冰, 李占斌, 李鹏, 等. 土地退化/恢复中土壤可蚀性动态变化[J]. 农业工程学报, 2009, 25(2):56. ZHU Bingbing, LI Zhanbin, LI Peng, et al. Dynamic changes of soil erodibility during process of land degradation and restoration[J]. Transactions of the CSAE, 2009, 25(2):56.
[18]	王敬哲, 丁建丽, 王飞, 等. 艾比湖湿地不同盐渍化土壤粒度组成及可蚀性研究[J]. 土壤, 2018, 50(3):598. WANG Jingzhe, DING Jianli, WANG Fei, et al. Particle size distribution (PSD) and erodibility of soils under different salinization degrees in Ebinur Lake Wetland[J]. Soils, 2018, 50(3):598.
[19]	刘斌涛, 陶和平, 史展, 等. 青藏高原土壤可蚀性K值的空间分布特征[J]. 水土保持通报, 2014, 34(4):11. LIU Bintao, TAO Heping, SHI Zhan, et al. Spatial distribution characteristics of soil erodibility K value in Qinghai-Tibet Plateau[J]. Bulletin of Soil and Water Conservation, 2014, 34(4):11.