|
|
|
| Research progress in fingerprint technology identifying sediment source in the past 30 years |
| CHEN Qitao1, WANG Tian1,2, LI Zhanbin1,2, ZHANG Jiao1, LI Peng1,2, CHENG Shengdong1,2 |
1. State Key Laboratory of Eco-hydraulics in Northwest Arid Region, Xi'an University of Technology, 710048, Xi'an, China;
2. Key Laboratory of National Forestry Administration on Ecological Hydrology and Disaster Prevention in Arid Regions, Xi'an University of Technology, 710048, Xi'an, China |
|
|
|
|
Abstract [Background] Soil erosion is one of the major global environmental issues. As one of the core contents of soil erosion research, the source of sediment in watersheds has received widespread attention and research. The identification of sediment sources has an important role and significance for the analysis of the temporal and spatial distribution characteristics of soil erosion and the benefit evaluation of soil and water conservation measures. Fingerprint recognition technology has been developing for many years, and various research methods have emerged in an endless stream. Understanding the development process of research and cutting-edge hotspots has become an important prerequisite for technological development.[Methods] To grasp the frontiers and application hotspots of fingerprint identification of sediment sources at home and abroad, mathematical statistics and bibliometric methods were used to analyze the journal papers published in the field of fingerprint identification of sediment sources for 30 years from 1991 to 2021, based on the core papers of Web of Science and CNKI database, CiteSpace software.[Results] The fingerprint technology to identify the source of sediment has started to grow rapidly since 1997, reached a high fever period in 2013-2019, and reached a peak of 150 articles in 2019. China, the United States, and the United Kingdom were the main research countries at this stage. The cumulative number of papers published by the three was more than 60% of the total number of statistics. China accounted for 19.2%, the United States accounts for 23.88%, and the United Kingdom accounts for 20.85%. In particular, the United States accounted for 32.67% of the highly cited papers selected. The United Kingdom, France, and Germany were pioneers in the study of fingerprint identification of the source of sediment. In terms of cooperative research, the U.S. Geological Survey has close cooperative ties with four major global centers (Chinese Academy of Sciences, Lausanne Research Institute, Spanish Research Council, and the University of Paris-Saclay). The research mainly was involved the three fields of environment, ecology, and geology. The specific research content was the selection of fingerprint factors, the analysis method of evaluating and judging the contribution rate of sediment, and the research area was mainly concentrated in the watershed near the agricultural area. The current research frontiers in this field were the consideration of uncertainty (identification and classification of potential sources, sample collection, variation of fingerprint properties, etc.), and the improvement of analytical models.[Conclusions] The current research frontiers in this field are the consideration of uncertainties (identification and classification of potential sources, sample collection, variation of fingerprint properties, etc.), further improvement of fingerprint factors, diverse regions and larger watershed scales, and transformation to practical tools cutting edge research will be broader in scale, the research perspective will be more thorough and in-depth, and the accuracy of the research data will be higher and more accurate. How to reduce the cost of this method is also one of the key research directions in the future.
|
|
Received: 22 November 2021
|
|
|
|
|
|
| [1] |
COLLINS A L, ZHANG Y, WALLING D E, et al. Quantifying fine-grained sediment sources in the River Axe catchment, southwest England:application of a Monte Carlo numerical modelling framework incorporating local and genetic algorithm optimization[J]. Hydrological Processes, 2012, 26(13):1962.
|
| [2] |
HADDADCHI A, RYDER D S, EVRARD O, et al. Sediment fingerprinting in fluvial systems:review of tracers, sediment sources and mixing models[J]. International Journal of Sediment Research, 2013, 28(4):560.
|
| [3] |
WALLING D E, COLLINS A L, MCMELLIN G K. A reconnaissance survey of the source of interstitial fine sediment recovered from salmonid spawning gravels in England and Wales[J]. Hydrobiologia, 2003, 497(1/3):91.
|
| [4] |
张信宝, 贺秀斌, 文安邦, 等. 川中丘陵区小流域泥沙来源的137Cs和210Pb双同位素法研究[J]. 科学通报, 2004, 49(15):1537. ZHANG Xinbao, HE Xiubin, WEN Anbang, et al. A study on the source of sediment in small watershed in the hilly area of central sichuan by 137Cs and 210Pb double isotope method[J]. Chinese Science Bulletin, 2004, 49(15):1537.
|
| [5] |
刘刚, 杨明义, 刘普灵, 等. 近十年来核素示踪技术在土壤侵蚀研究中的应用进展[J]. 核农学报, 2007, 21(1):101. LIU Gang, YANG Mingyi, LIU Puling, et al. Progress of nuclide tracing technology in the study of soil erosion in decade.[J]. Journal of Nuclear Agricultural Sciences, 2007, 21(1):101.
|
| [6] |
唐强, 贺秀斌, 鲍玉海, 等. 泥沙来源"指纹"示踪技术研究综述[J]. 中国水土保持科学, 2013, 11(3):109. TANG Qiang, HE Xiubin, BAO Yuhai, et al. A review of studies on catchment sediment sources discrimination with fingerprinting techniques[J]. Science of Soil and Water Conservation, 2013, 11(3):109.
|
| [7] |
陈方鑫. 利用生物标志物和复合指纹分析法识别小流域泥沙来源[D]. 武汉:华中农业大学, 2017:37. CHEN Fangxin. Using biomarkers and the composite fingerprinting method to identify sediment sources in small catchments[D]. Wuhan:Huazhong Agricultural University, 2017:37.
|
| [8] |
WILKINSON S N, WALLBRINK P J, HANCOCK G J, et al. Fallout radionuclide tracers identify a switch in sediment sources and transport-limited sediment yield following wildfire in a eucalypt forest[J]. Geomorphology, 2009, 110(3/4):140.
|
| [9] |
PULLEY S, FOSTER I, COLLINS A L. The impact of catchment source group classification on the accuracy of sediment fingerprinting outputs[J]. Journal of Environmental Management, 2017, 194:16.
|
| [10] |
COLLINS A L, BLACKWELL M, BOECKX P, et al. Sediment source fingerprinting:Benchmarking recent outputs, remaining challenges and emerging themes[J]. Journal of Soils and Sediments, 2020, 20(12):4160.
|
| [11] |
KOITER A J, OWENS P N, PETTICREW E L, et al. Assessment of particle size and organic matter correction factors in sediment source fingerprinting investigations:An example of two contrasting watersheds in Canada[J]. Geoderma, 2018, 325:195.
|
| [12] |
PULLEY S, ROWNTREE K. The use of an ordinary colour scanner to fingerprint sediment sources in the South African Karoo[J]. Journal of Environmental Management, 2016, 165:253.
|
| [13] |
DE BOER D H, CROSBY G. Evaluating the potential of SEM/EDS analysis for fingerprinting suspended sediment derived from two contrasting top soils[J]. Catena, 1995, 24(4):243.
|
| [14] |
王晓. "粒度分析法"在小流域泥沙来源研究中的应用[J]. 水土保持研究, 2002, 9(3):42. WANG Xiao. Studying source of sediment in small watershed using grain size analysis[J]. Research of Soil and Water Conservation, 2002, 9(3):42.
|
| [15] |
ATHANASIOS. Soil fingerprinting in the Palouse basin, using stable carbon and nitrogen isotopes[J]. International Journal of Sediment Research, 2003(2):278.
|
| [16] |
COLLINS A L, WALLING D E, LEEKS G J L. Source type ascription for fluvial suspended sediment based on a quantitative composite fingerprinting technique[J]. Catena, 1997, 29(1):1.
|
| [17] |
OLDFIELD F, RUMMERY T A, THOMPSON R, et al. Identification of suspended sediment sources by means of magnetic measurements:Some preliminary results[J]. Water Resources Research, 1979, 15:211.
|
| [18] |
WALLBRINK P J, MURRAY A S, OLLEY J M, et al. Determining sources and transit times of suspended sediment in the Murrumbidgee River, New South Wales, Australia, using fallout 137 Cs and 210 Pb[J]. Water Resources Research, 1998, 34(4):879.
|
| [19] |
TURNER D. Accretion and canal impacts in a rapidly subsiding wetland Ⅱ. Feldspar marker horizon technique[J]. Estuaries, 1989, 12(4):260.
|
| [20] |
COOPER R J, PEDENTCHOUK N, HISCOCK K M, et al. Apportioning sources of organic matter in streambed sediments:An integrated molecular and compound-specific stable isotope approach[J]. Science of The Total Environment, 2015, 520:187.
|
| [21] |
POULENARD J, PERRETTE Y, FANGET B, et al. Infrared spectroscopy tracing of sediment sources in a small rural watershed (French Alps)[J]. Science of The Total Environment, 2009, 407(8):2808.
|
| [22] |
WALLING D E. Tracing suspended sediment sources in catchments and river systems[J]. Science of the Total Environment, 2005, 344(1):159.
|
| [23] |
MOTHA J A, WALLBRINK P J, HAIRSINE P B, et al. Determining the sources of suspended sediment in a forested catchment in southeastern Australia[J]. Water Resources Research, 2003, 39(3):1056.
|
| [24] |
HUGHES A O, OLLEY J M, CROKE J C, et al. Sediment source changes over the last 250 years in a dry-tropical catchment, central Queensland, Australia[J]. Geomorphology, 2009, 104(3):262.
|
| [25] |
COLLINS A L, WALLING D E, WEBB L, et al. Apportioning catchment scale sediment sources using a modified composite fingerprinting technique incorporating property weightings and prior information[J]. Geoderma, 2010, 155(3):249.
|
| [26] |
DEVEREUX O H, PRESTEGAARD K L, NEEDELMAN B A, et al. Suspended-sediment sources in an urban watershed, Northeast Branch Anacostia River, Maryland[J]. Hydrological Processes, 2010, 24(11):1391.
|
| [27] |
COLLINS A L, WALLING D E, WEBB L, et al. Apportioning catchment scale sediment sources using a modified composite fingerprinting technique incorporating property weightings and prior information[J]. Geoderma, 2010, 155(3/4):249.
|
| [28] |
GELLIS A. Sediment sources and transport in the Chesapeake Bay Watershed:USGS Chesapeake Bay Activities[J]. Abstracts of Papers of the American Chemical Society, 2013, 236(17):1026.
|
| [29] |
VOLKMAN J K, HOLDSWORTH D G, NEILL G P, et al. Identification of natural, anthropogenic and petroleum-hydrocarbons in aquatic sediments[J]. Science of the Total Environment, 1992, 112(2/3):203.
|
| [30] |
KUMAR M, FURUMAI H, KURISU F, et al. Tracing source and distribution of heavy metals in road dust, soil and soakaway sediment through speciation and isotopic fingerprinting[J]. Geoderma, 2013, 211:8.
|
| [31] |
TIECHER T, GOMES MINELLA J P, MIGUEL P, et al. The contribution of sediment sources in a rural catchment under no-tillage[J]. Revista Brasileira De Ciencia Do Solo, 2014, 38(2):639.
|
| [32] |
BELMONT P, WILLENBRING J K, SCHOTTLER S P, et al. Toward generalizable sediment fingerprinting with tracers that are conservative and nonconservative over sediment routing timescales[J]. Journal of Soils and Sediments, 2014, 14(8):1479.
|
| [33] |
MARTINEZ-CARRERAS N, KREIN A, UDELHOVEN T, et al. A rapid spectral-reflectance-based fingerprinting approach for documenting suspended sediment sources during storm runoff events[J]. Journal of Soils and Sediments, 2010, 10(3):400.
|
| [34] |
ROWNTREE K M, VAN DER WAAL B W, PULLEY S. Magnetic susceptibility as a simple tracer for fluvial sediment source ascription during storm events[J]. Journal of Environmental Management, 2017, 194:54.
|
| [35] |
ZHANG X C, LIU B L. Using multiple composite fingerprints to quantify fine sediment source contributions:A new direction[J]. Geoderma, 2016, 268:108.
|
| [36] |
TIECHER T, MINELLA J P G, CANER L, et al. Quantifying land use contributions to suspended sediment in a large cultivated catchment of southern Brazil (Guapore River, Rio Grande do Sul)[J]. Agriculture Ecosystems & Environment, 2017, 237:95.
|
| [37] |
BATISTA P V G, LACEBY J P, SILVA M L N, et al. Using pedological knowledge to improve sediment source apportionment in tropical environments[J]. Journal of Soils and Sediments, 2019, 19(9):3274.
|
|
|
|
