区域森林水源涵养功能评价模型的开发与应用

doi:10.16843/j.sswc.2023.01.014

Abstract
Figure/Table
References
Related Citation (15)

Download: PDF (3969 KB) HTML (1 KB)
Export: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

Abstract [Background] Multiple types of forest changes including deforestation, insect infestation, fire, and afforestation coupled with forest growth and restoration occur at a regional scale, which lead to the restoration effects of forest and associated water conservation capacity accumulate over space and time. The Zagunao watershed has suffered from deforestation in the past decades, which has severely reduced its water conservation capacity. This paper focuses on the forest change dynamics and the corresponding restoration of the water conservation capacity in this watershed under a series of ecological protection projects. However, traditional assessment tools of forest water conservation function lack the description of the spatial-temporal cumulation of forest growth and associated water conservation capacity, and are featured with complex computation, which impedes the evaluation on the effects of forest restoration on water conservation in a rapid and accurate way.[Methods] To address this issue, we innovatively developed the Equivalent Recovery Area (ERA) model for describing the hydrological function recovery with forest changes after forest deforestation and assessing the spatial-temporal dynamics of cumulative forest recovery after forest logging. Then, through combining the forest restoration evaluation model (ERA) and classic forest water storage function evaluation method (comprehensive water storage capacity method), this study took advantage of ENVI/IDL, ArcGIS Engine/C#.Net GIS to develop a GIS-based tool for assessing regional forest changes and associated forest water conservation function dynamics. The tool named Regional Forest Water Conservation Function Assessment Model (RFWCFAM) supports to evaluate the spatial-temporal changes of forest landscapes and forest water conservation functions under natural and artificial recovery scenarios. Charts and spatial distribution maps of forest changes, water conservation capacity dynamics, and restoration measures layout generated, after inputting precipitation, vegetation/forest, soil, and forest restoration measures data in RFWCFAM.[Results]This tool was successfully applied in the Zagunao watershed. According to the assessment, the EHFR (equivalent hydrological function recovery) coefficient increased in study area with the implementation of natural and artificial restoration measures from 2010 to 2030. The canopy, litter, soil and total forest water conservation capacity of the Zagunao watershed were about 129.8, 25.96, 523.62, and 697.37 t/hm², respectively, in 2010, and all layers showed consistent upward tendencies from 2010 to 2030 under both natural restoration and artificial restoration scenarios. The artificial restoration measures yielded better effect on forest water conservation function than natural restoration. By 2030, the forest water conservation capacity of artificial restoration scenario is expected to be about 5.19% higher than that of natural restoration scenario.[Conclusions] The RFWCFAM has addressed the limitations of the traditional water resource assessment method and has been successfully applied and validated in the Zagunao watershed. Additionally, the RFWCFAM can provide an effective assessment tool to forest and water managers for evaluating the potential effects of forest restoration on water conservation function, along with scientific supports for adaptive forest management and soil and water conservation project evaluation and management in restorations of forest ecosystem functions in China.

Key words： forest restoration ERA water conservation capacity GIS secondary development comprehensive water storage capacity method soil and water conservation

Received: 28 June 2021

PACS:

K903

	Service

	E-mail this article
	Add to my bookshelf
	Add to citation manager
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	Articles by authors
	YU Enxu
	ZHANG Mingfang
	XU Yali
	SUN Pengsen
	MENG Zuozhu

Cite this article:

YU Enxu,ZHANG Mingfang,XU Yali, et al. Development and application of a regional forest water conservation function assessment tool[J]. SSWC, 2023, 21(1): 119-127.

URL:

http://journal12.magtechjournal.com/Jweb_stbc/EN/10.16843/j.sswc.2023.01.014 OR http://journal12.magtechjournal.com/Jweb_stbc/EN/Y2023/V21/I1/119

[1]	郑学良,陈丽华,李洪洋,等. 基于水源涵养功能的辽东防护林体系健康评价[J]. 中国水土保持科学,2020,18(2):102. ZHENG Xueliang, CHEN Lihua, LI Hongyang, et al. Health assessment of Liaodong shelterbelt system based on water conservation[J]. Science of Soil and Water Conservation, 2020, 18(2):102.
[2]	张丽娜,许丽,秦儒,等. 基于模糊物元模型的3种灌木林水源涵养能力评价:以内蒙古黑岱沟露天煤矿排土场为例[J]. 中国水土保持科学,2019,17(1):31. ZHANG Lina, XU Li, QIN Ru, et al. Evaluation of water conservation capacity of three shrub forests based on fuzzy matter-element model:A case study of Heidaigou open pit mine dump in Inner Mongolia[J]. Science of Soil and Water Conservation, 2019, 17(1):31.
[3]	王先棒,贺康宁,董喆,等. 北川河流域典型林型水源涵养能力评价[J]. 中国水土保持科学,2017,15(5):94. WANG Xianbang, HE Kangning, DONG Zhe, et al. Evaluation on water conservation capacity of typical forest types in Beichuan River basin[J]. Science of Soil and Water Conservation, 2017, 15(5):94.
[4]	胡婵娟,郭雷. 植被恢复的生态效应研究进展[J]. 生态环境学报,2012,1(9):1640. HU Chanjuan, GUO Lei. Advances in the research of ecological effects of vegetation restoration[J]. Ecology and Environmental Sciences, 2012, 1(9):1640.
[5]	陈秀兰,何勇,张丹丹,等. 中国森林生态恢复与重建生态效益评价研究进展[J]. 林业经济问题,2008,28(3):192. CHEN Xiulan, HE Yong, ZHANG Dandan, et al. Review on the eco-efficiency evaluation of forest ecosystem restoration and reconstruction in China[J]. Issues of Forestry Economics, 2008, 28(3):192.
[6]	宫渊波,陈林武,张健,等. 嘉陵江上游低山暴雨区植被恢复对沟道产流的影响研究[J]. 水土保持学报,2009,23(4):1. GONG Yuanbo, CHEN Linwu, ZHANG Jian, et al. Effects of vegetation restoration on channel runoff in the low-mountain and rainstorm area of the upper Jialing river[J]. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 2009, 23(4):1.
[7]	李贵祥,孟广涛,方向京,等. 珠江源头区不同地类人工恢复植被树种选择及生态效益研究[J]. 水土保持通报,2007,27(4):126. LI Guixiang, MENG Guangtao, FANG Xiangjing, et al. Species selection and ecological benefits of revegetation on different types of land in the headstream area of Pearl River[J]. Bulletin of Soil and Water Conservation, 2007, 27(4):126.
[8]	桑卫国,马克平,陈灵芝,等. 森林动态模型概论[J]. 植物学报,1999,16(3):193. SANG Weiguo, MA Keping, CHEN Lingzhi, et al. A brief review on forest dynamics models[J]. Chinese Bulletin of Botany, 1999, 16(3):193.
[9]	SITCH S S B, PRENTICE I C, ARNETH A, et al. Evaluation of ecosystem dynamics, plant geography and terrestrial carbon cycling in the LPJ dynamic global vegetation model[J]. Global Change Biology, 2010, 9(2):161.
[10]	DAI Erfu, WU Zhuo, WANG Xiaofan, et al. Progress and prospect of research on forest landscape model[J]. Journal of Geographical Sciences, 2014, 25(1):113.
[11]	王勇,庄大方,徐新良,等. 宏观生态环境遥感监测系统总体设计与关键技术[J]. 地球信息科学学报,2011,13(5):672. WANG Yong, ZHUANG Dafang, XU Xinliang, et al. Design of macro-ecological environment remote sensing monitoring system and the key technologies[J]. Geo-Information Science, 2011, 13(5):672.
[12]	李姗姗. 基于RS与GIS的祁连山南坡水源涵养量估算系统研究与实现[D]. 西宁:青海师范大学,2015:10. LI Shanshan. Research and development of the water conservation estimation system based on RS and GIS in the southern slope of Qilian mountains[D]. Xining:Qinghai Normal University, 2015:10.
[13]	WEI Xiaohua, ZHANG Mingfang. Research methods for assessing the impacts of forest disturbance on hydrology at large-scale watersheds[M]//LI C, LAFORTEZZA R, CHEN J. Landscape Ecology in Forest Management and Conservation:Challenges and Solutions for Global Change. Berlin, Heidelberg; Springer Berlin Heidelberg. 2011:119.
[14]	蒙作主. 区域森林变化与水源涵养功能估算及系统实现[D]. 成都:电子科技大学,2019:18. MENG Zuozhu. Evaluation and system realization for regional forest change and water conservation function[D]. Chengdu:University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, 2019:18.
[15]	孙清琳,李延森,郭继凯,等. 云和县森林生态系统水源涵养功能评估[J]. 北京大学学报(自然科学版),2015,51(5):888. SUN Qinglin, LI Yansen, GUO Jikai, et al. Assessment of water conservation function of forest ecosystem in Yunhe county, Zhejiang province[J]. Acta Scientiarum Naturalium Universitatis Pekinensis, 2015, 51(5):888.
[16]	刘彦春. 川西亚高山主要森林类型恢复过程中地上生物量、生产力变化研究[D]. 北京:中国林业科学研究院,2010:15. LIU Yanchun. Research on the changes of aboveground biomass and NPP in recovery process for main forest types in subalpine region of western Sichuan[D]. Beijing:Chinese Academy of Forestry, 2010:15.
[17]	冯秋红,刘兴良,卢昌泰,等. 不同经营模式对川西亚高山天然次生林林地水文效应的影响[J]. 生态学报,2016,36(17):5432. FENG Qiuhong, LIU Xingliang, LU Changtai, et al. Effects of different forest management regimes on woodland hydrological effects of natural secondary forests in a sub-alpine region of western Sichuan, China[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2016, 36(17):5432.
[18]	师嘉祺. 岷江上游杂谷脑流域森林景观恢复对关键生态功能的影响[D]. 成都:电子科技大学,2020:25. SHI Jiaqi. The effect of forest landscape restoration on key ecological functions in the Zagunao watershed, the upper reaches of Minjiang river[D]. Chengdu:University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, 2020:25.
[19]	师嘉祺,余恩旭,徐亚莉,等. 气候变化下西南亚高山森林景观恢复效果模拟预测:以岷江杂谷脑河上游流域为例[J]. 应用与环境生物学报, 2021,27(3):716. SHI Jiaqi, YU Enxu, XU Yali, et al. Simulating the effects of forest landscape restoration under climate change in southwest subalpine forests in China:A case study in the upper Zagunao watershed of the Minjiang River Basin[J].Chinese Journal of Applied and Environmental Biology, 2021, 27(3):716.
[20]	邓力濠. 岷江上游森林生态系统水源涵养功能尺度转换的研究[D]. 成都:电子科技大学,2021:35. DENG Lihao. Study on the scale transformation of water conservation function of forest ecosystem in the upper reaches of Minjiang River[D]. Chengdu:University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, 2021:35.