离心机与压力板仪测定土壤水分特征曲线比较

doi:10.16843/j.sswc.2022.04.013

Abstract
Figure/Table
References
Related Citation (12)

Download: PDF (1919 KB) HTML (1 KB)
Export: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

Abstract [Background] Accurate and efficient determination of soil water retention curve is important for the study of soil water movement and soil erosion. Various measurement methods are based on different mechanisms and each method has different applicability. Comparing method differences across multiple soil types can reflect the influence of soil properties on measurement results of equipment and provide a reference for selecting suitable methods for determining soil water retention curve. [Methods] Centrifuge and pressure plate were used to determine the soil water retention curve of black soil, loessal soil, red soil, cinnamon soil and purple soil in the water erosion region. The determination range of 2 methods was 0-15300cm, and the data were divided into the low suction stage (0-1000cm) and the high suction stage (>1000-15300cm) to analyze the differences between the two methods. A paired samples t test was used to test the significance of the differences in soil volume water content determined by centrifuge and pressure plate. [Results] The water content of 5 soils measured by the centrifuge was lower than that of the pressure plate at low suction stage, contents while the result at high suction stage was the opposite pattern. The measurement results of black soil, loessal soil, cinnamon soil and purple soil had extremely significant differences (P<0.01) at high suction stage. The measurement difference of red soil was significant (P<0.05) at low suction stage, and the water contents measured by the 2 methods at high suction stage were very close. At high suction stage, soil types with high clay and silt content caused incomplete soil drainage due to insufficient balance time in the pressure plate, which was significantly different from the water content determined by the centrifuge. Soil types with high sand content were mainly affected by the change of bulk density at low suction stage, which obviously caused the centrifuge measurement result to be lower than that of the pressure plate. [Conclusions] Soil texture and pore distribution are the main reasons for the difference in measurement between the 2 methods for different soil types. For soils with high sand content, the soil volume is compressed obviously during the centrifuge determination process; for soils with high clay and silt content, the centrifuge method is relatively more suitable.

Key words： soil water retention curve soil porosity centrifuge pressure plate soil type

Received: 25 October 2020

PACS:

S152.7

	Service

	E-mail this article
	Add to my bookshelf
	Add to citation manager
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	Articles by authors
	ZHOU Zhuoli
	ZHANG Zhuodong
	GAO Xiaofei
	QU Xinmiao
	HE Enpei

Cite this article:

ZHOU Zhuoli,ZHANG Zhuodong,GAO Xiaofei, et al. Comparison of centrifuge and pressure plate on soil water retention curve determination[J]. SSWC, 2022, 20(4): 101-108.

URL:

http://journal12.magtechjournal.com/Jweb_stbc/EN/10.16843/j.sswc.2022.04.013 OR http://journal12.magtechjournal.com/Jweb_stbc/EN/Y2022/V20/I4/101

[1]	邵明安,王全九,黄明斌.土壤物理学[M].北京:高等教育出版社, 2006:67.SHAO Ming'an, WANG Quanjiu, HUANG Mingbin.Soil physics[M].Beijing:Higher Education Press, 2006:67.
[2]	王红兰,唐翔宇,鲜青松,等.紫色土水分特征曲线室内测定方法的对比[J].水科学进展, 2016, 27(2):240.WANG Honglan, TANG Xiangyu, XIAN Qingsong, et al.Comparison of laboratory methods for determining water retention curves in purple soil[J].Advances in Water Science, 2016, 27(2):240.
[3]	SCHELLE H, IDEN S C, DURNER W.Combined transient method for determining soil hydraulic properties in a wide pressure head range[J].Soil Science Society of America Journal, 2011, 75(5):1681.
[4]	高晓飞,顾治家,李爽.不同侵蚀退化程度黑土持水特性研究[J].灌溉排水学报, 2018, 37(S1):61.GAO Xiaofei, GU Zhijia, LI Shuang.Change of black soil water retention characteristics under different erosion degree[J].Journal of Irrigation and Drainage, 2018, 37(S1):61.
[5]	肖德安,王世杰.土壤水研究进展与方向评述[J].生态环境学报, 2009, 18(3):1182.XIAO De'an, WANG Shijie.Comments on the progress and direction in soil water research[J].Ecology and Environmental Sciences, 2009, 18(3):1182.
[6]	REATTO A, DA SILVA E M, BRUAND A, et al.Validity of the centrifuge method for determining the water retention properties of tropical soils[J].Soil Science Society of America Journal, 2008, 72(6):1547.
[7]	吕殿青,邵明安.非饱和土壤水力参数的模型及确定方法[J].应用生态学报, 2004, 15(1):163.LÜ Dianqing, SHAO Ming'an.Models and determining methods of unsaturated soil hydraulic parameters[J].Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2004, 15(1):163.
[8]	秦文静,樊贵盛.冲洪积平原土壤低吸力阶段水分特征曲线影响因素研究[J].节水灌溉, 2019(10):38.QIN Wenjing, FAN Guisheng.Study on influencing factors of water characteristic curve of alluvial-diluvial plain soil at low suction stage[J].Water Saving Irrigation, 2019(10):38.
[9]	王檬檬,李钢铁,党宏忠,等.黄土残塬沟壑区苹果园土壤的持水特征[J].中国水土保持科学, 2019, 17(6):27.WANG Mengmeng, LI Gangtie, DANG Hongzhong, et al.Water-holding characteristics of apple orchards in the gully area of the Loess Plateau[J].Science of Soil and Water Conservation, 2019, 17(6):27.
[10]	程子捷,张海东,蒋芳市,等.安溪县花岗岩崩岗土体水分特征曲线及其影响因素[J].水土保持学报, 2018, 32(3):120.CHENG Zijie, ZHANG Haidong, JIANG Fangshi, et al.Water characteristic curve and its influence factors of granite Benggang soil in Anxi county[J].Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 2018, 32(3):120.
[11]	彭紫赟,黄爽,杨金忠,等.HYPROP系统与快速离心法联合测定土壤水分特征曲线[J].灌溉排水学报, 2012, 31(5):7.PENG Ziyun, HUANG Shuang, YANG Jinzhong, et al.Using HYPROP system and centrifugal method to measure soil water characteristic curve[J].Journal of Irrigation and Drainage, 2012, 31(5):7.
[12]	吕殿青,邵明安,潘云.容重变化与土壤水分特征的依赖关系研究[J].水土保持学报, 2009, 23(3):209.LÜ Dianqing, SHAO Ming'an, PAN Yun.Dependent relationship between bulk density changes and soil water characteristics[J].Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 2009, 23(3):209.
[13]	陈印平,夏江宝,刘俊华.不同农田防护林下盐碱地土壤水分特征曲线差异对比[J].中国水土保持科学, 2019, 17(5):18.CHEN Yinping, XIA Jiangbao, LIU Junhua.Comparison of soil water characteristic curves of saline-alkali land under different farmland shelterbelts[J].Science of Soil and Water Conservation, 2019, 17(5):18.
[14]	任健,张吴平,王国芳,等.基于离心机法获取定体积质量下的土壤水分特征曲线[J].灌溉排水学报, 2020, 39(1):84.REN Jian, ZHANG Wuping, WANG Guofang, et al.Method to adjust the soil water retention curve measured using centrifuge apparatus[J].Journal of Irrigation and Drainage, 2020, 39(1):84.
[15]	邵明安.不同方法测定土壤基质势的差别及准确性的初步研究[J].土壤通报, 1985, 29(5):222.SHAO Ming'an.Preliminary study on the difference and accuracy of soil matric potential determination by different methods[J].Chinese Journal of Soil Science, 1985, 29(5):222.
[16]	刘思春,高亚军,王永一,等.土壤水势测定方法的选择及准确性研究[J].干旱地区农业研究, 2011, 29(4):189.LIU Sichun, GAO Yajun, WANG Yongyi, et al.Preliminary study on selection and accuracy of different methods for measurement of soil water potential[J].Agricultural Research in the Arid Areas, 2011, 29(4):189.
[17]	邓羽松,夏栋,蔡崇法,等.基于分形理论模拟花岗岩崩岗剖面土壤水分特征曲线[J].中国水土保持科学, 2016, 14(2):1.DENG Yusong, XIA Dong, CAI Chongfa, et al.Simulation of water characteristic curve in the soil profile of the collapsing gully on granite area of South China based on the fractal theory[J].Science of Soil and Water Conservation, 2016, 14(2):1.
[18]	刘瑛娜,刘宝元,张科利,等.微型小区在土壤可蚀性估算中的应用[J].中国水土保持科学, 2015, 13(4):103.LIU Yingna, LIU Baoyuan, ZHANG Keli, et al.Soil erodibility estimation using micro-plots[J].Science of Soil and Water Conservation, 2015, 13(4):103.
[19]	付强,蒋睿奇,王子龙,等.基于改进萤火虫算法的土壤水分特征曲线参数优化[J].农业工程学报, 2015, 31(11):117.FU Qiang, JIANG Ruiqi, WANG Zilong, et al.Optimization of soil water characteristic curves parameters by modified firefly algorithm[J].Transactions of the CSAE, 2015, 31(11):117.
[20]	赵玉明,高晓飞,刘瑛娜,等.不同水稳性团聚体测定方法的对比研究[J].水土保持通报, 2013, 33(2):138.ZHAO Yuming, GAO Xiaofei, LIU Yingna, et al.Comparison of different pre-wetting strategies in wet aggregate stability determination[J].Bulletin of Soil and Water Conservation, 2013, 33(2):138.
[21]	黄婉霞,邓羽松,谢福倩,等.花岗岩崩岗不同部位土壤饱和导水率特征及其影响因素[J].应用生态学报, 2020, 31(7):2431.HUANG Wanxia, DENG Yusong, XIE Fuqian, et al.Characteristics of soil saturated hydraulic conductivity on different positions and their controlling factors of granite collapsing gullies[J].Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2020, 31(7):2431.
[22]	GEE G W, WARD A L, ZHANG Z F, et al.The influence of hydraulic non-equilibrium on pressure plate data[J].Vadose Zone Journal, 2002, 1(1):172.
[23]	李小刚,刘淑英.甘肃省黄绵土低吸力段持水特性的研究[J].土壤, 1995, 38(5):233.LI Xiaogang, LIU Shuying.Study on water retention characteristics of loessal soil at low suction stage in Gansu province[J].Soils, 1995,38(5):233.
[24]	于元芬,郭明先,孟飞,等.不同植被下黏质红壤水分特征曲线研究[J].节水灌溉, 2020, 45(9):69.YU Yuanfen, GUO Mingxian, MENG Fei, et al.Water characteristic curves of the clayey red soil under different vegetation types[J].Water Saving Irrigation, 2020, 45(9):69.
[25]	李笑吟,毕华兴,张建军,等.晋西黄土区土壤水分有效性研究[J].水土保持研究, 2006, 13(5):205.LI Xiaoyin, BI Huaxing, ZHANG Jianjun, et al.Study on the validity of soil moisture in loess area[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation, 2006, 13(5):205.
[26]	CRESSWELL H P, GREEN T W, MCKENZIE N J.The adequacy of pressure plate apparatus for determining soil water retention[J].Soil Science Society of America Journal, 2008, 72(1):41.
[27]	石浩楠,陈植华,胡成,等.江汉平原北部黏土层土壤水分特征曲线的测定与模拟[J].安全与环境工程, 2019, 26(5):25.SHI Haonan, CHEN Zhihua, HU Cheng, et al.Measurement and simulation of soil water characteristic curve of clay layer in the northern Jianghan plain[J].Safety and Environmental Engineering, 2019, 26(5):25.
[28]	吕殿青,邵明安,王全九.土壤持水特征测定中的容重变化及其确定方法[J].水利学报, 2003, 34(3):110.LÜ Dianqing, SHAO Ming'an, WANG Quanjiu.Bulk density changing during measuring soil water retention characteristics and its determining method[J].Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 2003, 34(3):110.
[29]	BITTELLI M, FLURY M.Errors in water retention curves determined with pressure plates[J].Soil Science Society of America Journal, 2009, 73(5):1453.