基于EnKF的湘江流域多源遥感土壤水分数据分析

doi:10.16843/j.sswc.2022.02.006

Abstract
Figure/Table
References
Related Citation (15)

Download: PDF (4993 KB) HTML (1 KB)
Export: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

Abstract [Background]Soil moisture plays an important role in the exchange of substance and energy in the ground-air interface, which is also a key variable in drought monitoring and conservation of water and soil. Therefore, it is of great importance to obtain reliable soil moisture data. [Methods] In this study, the performances of three remote sensing soil moisture datasets, namely, SMAP (soil moisture active passive), ASCAT(advanced scatterometer) and AMSR2(advanced microwave scanning radiometer 2), over the Xiang River basin from April 2017 to October 2019 were evaluated using four evaluation indices which are R (correlation coefficient), BIAS (relative bias), RMSE (root mean squared error) and ubRMSE(unbiased root mean squared error). The CLSMDAS (China land soil moisture data assimilation system) dataset was used as the reference data. Based on the evaluation results, products with relatively higher accuracy among these products were selected for the data fusion process with EnKF (Ensemble Kalman Filter) method. Then the accuracy of the fusion data set was evaluated using the reference data and compared with the original remote sensing datasets to verify the effectiveness of the EnKF algorithm in data fusion. [Results] 1) SMAP had the highest correlation with the reference data set, but there was a large deviation in a small part of the grid point scale, and there were individual outliers. ASCAT had a smaller deviation from the reference data set, but the correlation with the reference data set was lower than that of SMAP. However, AMSR2 cannot capture the change characteristics of soil moisture in the Xiangjiang River Basin, and seriously underestimates soil moisture. SMAP and ASCAT, which performed better among these three products, were selected for the fusion process. 2) The accuracy of merged soil moisture based on EnKF was high both in grid and basin scales. And the performance of the merged soil moisture on the evaluation indices were significantly improved, compared with the SMAP and ASCAT.At grid scale, compared with SMAP, the BIAS values of the merged soil moisture were lower at 42% grids. Compared with ASCAT, RMSE values and ubRMSE values of the merged soil moisture are improved at 80% grids, while R values were higher at 90% grids. At basin scale, compared with SMAP, the BIAS, RMSE and ubRMSE value of the merged soil moisture were improved 50%, 3%, and 3%, respectively. Compared to ASCAT, the R, BIAS, RMSE and ubRMSE values of the merged soil moisture were improved 56%, 65%, 27%, and 26%, respectively. [Conclusions] It is proved that a high-accuracy soil moisture dataset can be obtained through the fusion of multi-source remote sensing datasets, which provides important reference data for soil moisture monitoring and is of great significance for water and soil conservation and disaster reduction in the Xiang River basin.

Key words： multi-source remote sensing data soil moisture EnKF data fusion

Received: 27 January 2021

PACS:

S152.7+1

	Service

	E-mail this article
	Add to my bookshelf
	Add to citation manager
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	Articles by authors
	WANG Yushi
	MIN Xintong
	WANG Cheng
	XIA Chenqing
	ZHU Qian

Cite this article:

WANG Yushi,MIN Xintong,WANG Cheng, et al. Multi-source remote sensing soil moisture data analysis over the Xiang River basin based on EnKF[J]. SSWC, 2022, 20(2): 40-48.

URL:

http://journal12.magtechjournal.com/Jweb_stbc/EN/10.16843/j.sswc.2022.02.006 OR http://journal12.magtechjournal.com/Jweb_stbc/EN/Y2022/V20/I2/40

[1]	STEINEMANN A, IACOBELLIS S F, CAYAN D R, et al. Developing and evaluating drought indicators for decision-making[J]. Journal of Hydrometeorology, 2015, 16(4):1793.
[2]	D'URSO G, MINACAPILLI M. A semi-empirical approach for surface soil water content estimation from radar data without a-priori information on surface roughness[J]. Journal of Hydrology, 2006, 321(1):297.
[3]	CASHION J, LAKSHMI V, BOSCH D, et al. Microwave remote sensing of soil moisture:Evaluation of the TRMM microwave imager (TMI) satellite for the Little River Watershed Tifton, Georgia[J]. Journal of Hydrology, 2005, 307(1):242.
[4]	MLADENOVA I, LAKSHMI V, JACKSON T J, et al. Validation of AMSR-E soil moisture using L-band airborne radiometer data from National Airborne Field Experiment 2006[J]. Remote Sensing of Environment, 2011, 115(8):2096.
[5]	师春香,谢正辉,钱辉,等.基于卫星遥感资料的中国区域土壤湿度EnKF数据同化[J].中国科学:地球科学, 2011, 41(3):375. SHI Chunxiang, XIE Zhenghui, QIAN Hui, et al. China land soil moisture EnKF data assimilation based on satellite remote sensing data[J]. Sci China Earth Sci, 2011,41(3):375.
[6]	黄图南,郑有飞,段长春,等.几种卫星反演土壤湿度在中国地区的对比分析[J].遥感信息, 2017, 32(3):25. HUANG Tunan, ZHENG Youfei, DUAN Changchun, et al. Comparative analysis of soil moisture retrieval by satellites in China[J].Remote Sensing Information, 2017,32(3):25.
[7]	陈勇强. SMOS和SMAP数据可靠性研究[D].河南焦作:河南理工大学, 2019:4. CHEN Yongqiang. The reliability study of SMOS and SMAP data[D].Jiaozuo, Henan:Henan Polytechnic University, 2019:4.
[8]	KIM S, KIM H, CHOI M. Evaluation of satellite-based soil moisture retrieval over the korean peninsula:Using AMSR2 LPRM algorithm and ground measurement data[J]. Journal of Korea Water Resources Association, 2016, 49(5):423.
[9]	FAN C, CROW W T, COLLIANDER A, et al. Application of triple collocation in ground-based validation of soil moisture active/passive (SMAP) level 2 data products[J]. IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations&Remote Sensing, 2017, 10(2):489.
[10]	BURGIN M S, COLLIANDER A, NJOKU E G, et al. A comparative study of the SMAP passive soil moisture product with existing satellite-based soil moisture products[J]. IEEE Transactions on Geoence&Remote Sensing, 2017, 55(5):2959.
[11]	杨纲,郭鹏,李西灿,等.风云卫星微波遥感土壤水分产品适用性验证分析[J].水土保持研究, 2020, 27(1):104. YANG Gang, GUO Peng, LI Xican, et al. Assessment on applicability of soil moisture products of Fengyun satellite microwave remote sensing[J]. Research of Soil and Water Conservation, 2020,27(1):104.
[12]	NIJSSEN B, LETTENMAIER D P. Effect of precipitation sampling errors on simulated hydrological fluxes and states:Anticipating the global precipitation measurement satellites[J]. Journal of Geophysical Research:Earth Surface, 2004, 109(D2):103.
[13]	CONTI F L, HSU K L, NOTO L V, et al. Evaluation and comparison of satellite precipitation estimates with reference to a local area in the Mediterranean Sea[J]. Atmospheric Research, 2014, 138:189.
[14]	李菲菲.国内多源遥感数据融合研究综述[J].山西水土保持科技, 2008(2):1. LI Feifei. A review of domestic research on multi-source remote sensing data fusion[J]. Soil and Water Conservation Science and Technology in Shanxi, 2008(2):1.
[15]	翁永玲,田庆久.遥感数据融合方法分析与评价综述[J].遥感信息, 2003(3):49. WENG Yongling, TIAN Qingjiu. Analysis and evaluation of method on remote sensing data fusion[J]. Remote Sensing Information, 2003(3):49.
[16]	赵英时.遥感应用分析原理与方法[M].北京:科学出版社, 2003:10. ZHAO Yingshi. Principles and methods of remote sensing application analysis[M].Beijing:Science Press, 2003:10.
[17]	高健,武晓旭,王雨婷,等.基于En-KF的内蒙古地区多源土壤水分数据融合[J].安徽农业科学, 2018, 46(8):19. GAO Jian, WU Xiaoxu, WANG Yuting, et al. Multi-source soil moisture data fusion of Inner Mongolia based on En-KF[J]. Journal of Anhui Agricultural Sciences, 2018, 46(8):19.
[18]	曹炯玮,魏加华.集合卡尔曼滤波法在土壤湿度遥感数据融合的研究[J].青海师范大学学报(自然科学版), 2019(1):72. CAO Jiongwei, WEI Jiahua. Fusion of remote sensing data of soil moisture by Ensemble Kalman Filtering[J]. Journal of Qinghai Normal University (Natural Science), 2019(1):72.
[19]	康学远,施小清,邓亚平,等.基于EnKF融合地球物理数据刻画含水层非均质性[J].水科学进展, 2018, 29(1):40. KANG Xueyuan, SHI Xiaoqing, DENG Yaping, et al. Assimilation of hydrogeophysical data for the characterization of subsurface heterogeneity using Ensemble Kalman Filter (EnKF)[J]. Advances in Water Science, 2018, 29(1):40.
[20]	张泽群,任文娟,付琨,等.基于改进集合卡尔曼滤波方法的目标运动轨迹多源异步数据融合方法研究[J].电子与信息学报, 2018, 40(9):2143. ZHANG Zequn, REN Wenjuan, FU Kun, et al. Research on multi-source and asynchronous data fusion of target trajectory based on the modified Ensemble Kalman Filter method[J]. Journal of Electronics&Information Technology, 2018, 40(9):2143.
[21]	张文君,周天军,宇如聪.中国土壤湿度的分布与变化I.多种资料间的比较[J].大气科学, 2008, 32(3):581. ZHANG Wenjun, ZHOU Tianjun, YU Rucong. Spatial distribution and temporal variation of soil moisture over China Part I:Multi-data intercomparison[J]. Chinese Journal of Atmospheric Sciences, 2008, 32(3):581.
[22]	ZHU Qian, LUO Yulin, XU Yueping, et al. Satellite soil moisture for agricultural drought monitoring:Assessment of SMAP-derived soil water deficit index in Xiang River Basin, China[J]. Remote Sensing, 2019, 11(3):362.
[23]	TIAN Y, XU Y P, WANG G. Agricultural drought prediction using climate indices based on support vector regression in Xiangjiang River basin[J]. Science of the Total Environment, 2018, 622:710.
[24]	ENTEKHABI D, NJOKU E G, O″NEILL P E, et al. The soil moisture active passive (SMAP) mission[J]. Proceedings of the IEEE, 2010, 98(5):704.
[25]	KIM H, PARINUSSA R, KONINGS A G, et al. Global-scale assessment and combination of SMAP with ASCAT (active) and AMSR2(passive) soil moisture products[J]. Remote Sensing of Environment, 2018(204):260.
[26]	BARTALIS Z, WAGNER W, NAEIMI V, et al. Initial soil moisture retrieval from the METOP-A advanced scatterometer (ASCAT)[J]. Geophysical Research Letters, 2007(34):l20401.
[27]	ZHU Qian, LUO Yulin, ZHOU Dongyang, et al. Drought prediction using in situ and remote sensing products with SVM over the Xiang River Basin, China[J]. Natural Hazards, 2020(105):1.
[28]	ZHU Qian, WANG Yushi, LUO Yulin. Improvement of multi-layer soil moisture prediction using support vector machines and Ensemble Kalman Filter coupled with remote sensing soil moisture datasets over an agriculture dominant basin in China[J]. Hydrological Processes, 2021, 35(4):1.
[29]	EVENSEN G. Sequential data assimilation with a nonlinear quasi-geostrophic model using Monte Carlo methods to forecast error statistics[J]. Journal of Geophysical Research:Oceans, 1994, 99(C5):10143.
[30]	朱琳.集合卡尔曼滤波同化方法的研究[D].南京:南京信息工程大学, 2007:9. ZHU Lin. Study of Ensemble Kalman Filter[D]. Nanjing:Nanjing University of Information Science&Technology, 2007:9.
[31]	KIM S, LIU Y Y, JOHNSON F M, et al. A global comparison of alternate AMSR2 soil moisture products:Why do they differ?[J]. Remote Sensing of Environment, 2015, 161(43):43.
[32]	陆峥,韩孟磊,卢麾,等.基于AMSR2多频亮温的黑河流域中上游土壤水分估算研究[J].遥感技术与应用, 2020, 35(1):33. LU Zheng, HAN Menglei, LU Hui, et al. Estimating soil moisture in the middle and upper reaches of the Heihe River Basin based on AMSR2 multi-brightness temperature[J]. Remote Sensing Technology and Application, 2020, 35(1):33.
[33]	PAREDES-TREJO F, BARBOSA H. Evaluation of the SMOS-derived soil water deficit index as agricultural drought index in Northeast of Brazil[J]. Water, 2017, 9(6):377.