基于TOPSIS法的鲁中南山区不同混交林水土保持效益评价

doi:10.16843/j.sswc.2018.06.014

Abstract
Figure/Table
References (0)
Related Citation (15)

Download: PDF (775 KB) HTML (1 KB)
Export: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

Abstract [Background] Soil and water loss is one of the important factors that restrict the ecological construction and development in hilly area of middle southern of Shandong province. Based the benefit evaluation results of soil and water conservation, selecting suitable forest species and creating mixed forest are important measures for ecological environment management under different site conditions in this area. In order to better to carry out the ecological work of soil and water loss in hilly area of middle southern of Shandong province, the soil and water conservation benefits of the mixed forests in this area were comprehensively evaluated and the appropriate mixed forest model was selected.[Methods] Twelve types 10-year mixed forests in typical limestone and sand mountainous areas of middle southern of Shandong province were selected as the research object, and the benefits from the soil and water conservation as well as the improvement of forest stand were studied by field investigation and indoor analysis. The weights of comprehensive benefit evaluation indexes of soil and water conservation were calculated by entropy weight method, and each mixed forest mode was evaluated based on TOPSIS principle. The comprehensive benefits of soil and water conservation in different mixed forests were evaluated by combining 13 indicators of soil and water conservation benefits, and the suitable mixed forest mode for the study area was screened out.[Results] 1) In the limestone mountainous areas, for the mixed types of arbor and shrub, the benefit of soil and water conservation of the mixed forest of Platycladus orientalis and Armeniaca sibirica was the best, the soil improvement benefit of the mixed forest of P. orientalis and Cotinus coggygria was the best. Meanwhile, for the theropencedrymion, the benefits of soil and water conservation and soil improvement of the mixed forest of P. orientalis and Robinia pseudoacacia were the best. In addition, for the comprehensive benefits of soil and water conservation based on TOPSIS method, the mixed forest of P. orientalis and C. coggygria was the best in the mixed forest of arbor and shrub, and the mixed forest of P. orientalis forest and R. pseudoacacia forest was the best in the theropencedrymion. 2) In the sand mountainous areas, for the theropencedrymion, the benefits of soil and water conservation and soil improvement of the mixed forest of Pinus thunbergii and R. pseudoacacia was the best. And for the mixed types of broadleaved and broadleaved, the benefits of soil and water conservation and soil improvement of the mixed forest of R. pseudoacacia and Quercus acutissima were the best. 3) Also, according to the results of comprehensive benefit evaluation of soil and water conservation, the mixed forest of P. thunbergii and R. pseudoacacia was the best in the theropencedrymion, and the mixed forest of R. pseudoacacia and Q. acutissima was the best in the mixed types of broadleaved and broadleaved.[Conclusions] The results may provide the theoretical basis for the hybrid tree species selection of the artificial afforestation in hilly area of middle southern of Shandong province. Besides, the evaluation results based on the entropy weight and TOPSIS method are in fine agreement with the results obtained in other studies, and the evaluation method is recommended in the evaluation of soil and water conservation benefits of mixed forests.

Key words： mixed forest evaluation on ecological benefits TOPSIS method hilly area of middle southern part of Shandong province

Received: 21 June 2018

PACS:

S714.7

	Service

	E-mail this article
	Add to my bookshelf
	Add to citation manager
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	Articles by authors
	LI Yiran
	ZHANG Xinggang
	LI Zedong
	ZHANG Ruming
	CHENG Tiantian
	ZHANG Yongtao

Cite this article:

LI Yiran,ZHANG Xinggang,LI Zedong, et al. Evaluation of soil and water conservation benefits of different mixed forests in hilly area of middle southern of Shandong province by TOPSIS[J]. SSWC, 2018, 16(6): 108-117.

URL:

http://journal12.magtechjournal.com/Jweb_stbc/EN/10.16843/j.sswc.2018.06.014 OR http://journal12.magtechjournal.com/Jweb_stbc/EN/Y2018/V16/I6/108

[1]	陈幸良, 巨茜, 林昆仑. 中国人工林发展现状、问题与对策[J]. 世界林业研究, 2014, 27(6):54. CHEN Xingliang, JU Qian, LIN Kunlun.Development status, issues and countermeasures of China's plantation[J]. Word Forestry Research, 2014, 27(6):54.
[2]	王森林, 王宏年, 董德进, 等. 山东森林质量精准提升[J]. 林业资源管理, 2017(b12):47. WANG Senlin, WANG Hongnian, DONG Dejin, et al. Accurately lifting the forest quality of Shandong province[J]. Forest Resources Management, 2017(b12):47.
[3]	莫宇涵. 混交林的营造与生态林业建设研究[J]. 农业与技术, 2018, 38(3):60. MO Yuhan. Study on theconstruction of mixed forest and ecological forestry construction[J]. Agriculture and Technology, 2018, 38(3):60.
[4]	杨菲,杨吉华,艾钊, 等.鲁中片麻岩低山丘陵针阔混交林蓄水保土效益研究[J].水土保持学报,2014,28(2):51. YANG Fei, YANG Jihua, AI Zhao, et al. Study on function of soil and water conservation of different theropencedrymion in low mountains and hills of central Shandong Gneiss region[J]. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 2014, 28(2):51.
[5]	杨吉华, 胡建朋, 罗明达, 等. 鲁中南砂石山区不同林分类型保土功能及其效益[J]. 水土保持学报, 2011, 25(4):63. YANG Jihua, HU Jianpeng, LUO Mingda, et al. Functions and benefits of soil conservation of different forest types in sand mountain of central South Shandong[J]. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 2011, 25(4):63.
[6]	胡建朋, 杨吉华, 罗明达, 等. 山东砂石山区不同林分类型土壤的蓄水效益[J]. 中国水土保持科学, 2011, 9(5):67. HU Jianpeng, YANG Jihua, LUO Mingda, et al. Soil water storage efficiency of different stand types in sandy mountain of Shandong province[J]. Science of Soil and Water Conservation, 2011, 9(5):67.
[7]	冯欢, 谢世友, 柳芬, 等. 基于灰色关联定权Topsis和GIS的重庆市资源环境承载力研究[J]. 西南大学学报(自然科学版), 2017, 39(2):92. FENG Huan, XIE Shiyou, LIU Fen, et al. Research onresource and environment carrying capacity of Chongqing based on grey correlation TOPSIS and GIS[J]. Journal of Southwest University (Natural Science Edition), 2017, 39(2):92.
[8]	蒋荣超, 刘大维, 王登峰. 基于熵权TOPSIS方法的整车动力学性能多目标优化[J]. 机械工程学报, 2018, 54(2):150. JIANG Rongchao, LIU Dawei, WANG Dengfeng. Multi-objective optimization of vehicle dynamics performance based on entropy weighted TOPSIS method[J]. Journal of Mechanical Engineering, 2018, 54(2):150.
[9]	SINGH R K, AGRAWAL S. Analysing disposition strategies in reverse supply chains:Fuzzy TOPSIS approach[J]. Management of Environmental Quality an International Journal, 2018(3):427.
[10]	DANDAGE R, MANTHA S S, RANE S B. Ranking the risk categories in international projects using the TOPSIS method[J]. International Journal of Managing Projects in Business, 2018(6):317
[11]	梁博, 聂晓刚, 杨东升, 等. 西藏尼洋河流域下游5种典型土地利用方式土壤物理性质差异分析[J]. 西北农林科技大学学报(自然科学版), 2018(1):119. LIANG Bo, NIE Xiaogang, YANG Dongsheng, et al. Differences in soil physical properties of 5 typical land use types in downstream of the Niyang River in Tibet[J]. Journal of Northwest A&F University (Natural Science Edition), 2018(1):119.
[12]	石小亮, 张颖, 韩争伟. 森林碳汇计量方法研究综述:基于北京市的选择[J]. 林业经济, 2014, 36(11):44. SHI Xiaoliang, ZHANG Ying, HAN Zhengwei. Review of forest carbon sink measurement methods:Based on choice of Beijing[J]. Forestry Economics, 2014, 36(11):44.
[13]	张霞, 郑郁, 王亚萍. 基于灰色关联度的TOPSIS模型在秦岭生态功能区水土保持治理效益评价中的应用[J]. 水土保持研究, 2013, 20(6):188. ZHANG Xia, ZHENGG Yu, WANG Yaping. Application of TOPSIS model to beneficial evaluation of soil and water conversation of Qinling ecological function region based on gray correlation degree[J]. Research of Soil and Water Conservation, 2013, 20(6):188.
[14]	尤立, 刘平, 张俊龙, 等. 基于熵权的改进TOPSIS方法对黄河水土保持生态工程综合效益评估[J]. 安徽农业科学, 2017, 45(5):232. YOU Li, LIU Ping, ZHANG Junlong, et al.Evaluation of social and economic benefits of soil and water conservation project of Yellow River through entropy-weight TOPSIS method[J]. Journal of Anhui Agricultural Sciences, 2017, 45(5):232.
[15]	崔亮, 李永平, 曾雪婷, 等. 基于熵权TOPSIS法的水保工程水补偿效益评价[J]. 人民黄河, 2015, 37(12):88. CUI Liang, LI Yongping, ZENG Xueting, et all. Benefit evaluation of water compensation for water conservation project based on entropy weight TOPSIS method[J]. Yellow River, 2015, 37(12):88.
[16]	张国庆. 鲁中砂石山退化山地不同混交造林模式蓄水保土效益研究[D]. 泰安:山东农业大学, 2014:41. ZHANG Guoqing. Study on soil and water conservation benefits of different mixed forestation mode in sandy degraded mountain in middle of Shandong province[D].Tai'an:Shandong Agricultural University, 2014:41.