Response mechanism of plant seedling roots and soil to acid rain in Jinyun Mountain,Chongqing
ZHU Junlin1,2, HOU Ruiping3, WANG Yunqi1,2, WANG Yujie1,2, YANG Feng1,2, ZHANG Yuxuan1,2, ZHENG Yonglin1,2, SI Hongtao4
1. Three-Gorges Reservoir Area (Chongqing) Forest Ecosystem Research Station, Ministry of Education, School of Soil and Water Conservation, Beijing Forestry University, 100083, Beijing, China; 2. Three-Gorges Reservoir Area (Chongqing) Forest Ecosystem Research Station, School of Soil and Water Conservation, Beijing Forestry University, 100083, Beijing, China; 3. Academy of Forestry Inventory and Planning (AFIP), National Forestry and Grassland Administration, 100714, Beijing, China; 4. Observation and Research Station of Ecological Restoration for Chongqing Typical Mining Areas, Ministry of Natural Resources, Chongqing Institute of Geology and Mineral Resources, 401120, Chongqing, China
Abstract：[Background] Acid rain is a prominent problem in southern China. It can affect the chemical element balance of plant and soil. Among them, carbon(C), nitrogen(N) and phosphorus(P) are important elements required for plant growth and development. And the response mechanisms of different plants and soils to acid rain vary. The study was conducted in Jinyun Mountain, a typical acid rain area in Southwest China. Four plant seedlings were selected for simulated experiments under different concentrations of acid rain. The response mechanisms of plants and soils to acid rain stress were investigated by analyzing plant root and soil C, N and P contents and ratios, as well as changes in plant root morphology under different acid rain concentrations. [Methods] The experiment took Chongqing native tree species Pinus massoniana, Cunninghamia lanceolata, Cinnamomum camphora and Phyllostachys edulis as the research objects, and conducted acid rain(SO42-∶NO3-=1∶1) simulation experiment in May 2021, with four different treatments, namely CK(pH 7.0 distilled water), pH 4.5, pH 3.5 and pH 2.5, described as pH7.0, pH4.5, pH3.5 and pH2.5 below. The plant root morphology and soil and root C, N and P contents were measured after 4 months in simulated acid rain environment. SPSS Statistics 22.0 was also applied for univariate analysis, Canoco 5 for redundancy analysis, and Origin 2021 for correlation analysis and graphing. [Results] 1) At pH3.5, the root total N content of C. lanceolata and C. camphorar was significantly inhibited(P<0.05) and decreased by 18.86% and 35.66%, respectively, compared with the CK, and at pH4.5 the organic carbon stock of P.massoniana soil was elevated while the total N of P. edulis soil was lost. 2) Acid rain had different effects on each plant-soil C∶N∶P. The root C∶N of C. lanceolata and C. camphora increased significantly to 50.26 and 61.33 at pH3.5. The trends of root nitrogen and phosphorus changes were consistent under the acid rain treatment, and P. massoniana, C. lanceolata and P. edulis were limited by nitrogen elements. 3) Different plant roots behaved differently under the influence of acid rain, which promoted the root growth of P. massoniana and C. lanceolata and inhibited the root growth of C.camphora and P. edulis. 4) Root morphology was significantly positively correlated with root C∶N and root total carbon content, while it was significantly negatively correlated with root N∶P. [Conclusions] Tree species may influence the overall plant-soil response mechanism to acid rain. Short-term acid rain has not yet disrupted the overall balance of each plant-soil, and the buffering capacity of C. lanceolata soils is stronger than that of P. massoniana, C. lanceolata, and P. edulis soils, and the root system responds more positively to acid rain.
程滨,赵永军,张文广,等.生态化学计量学研究进展[J].生态学报,2010,30(6):1628.CHENG Bin,ZHAO Yongjun,ZHANG Wenguang,et al.The research advances and prospect of ecological stoichiometry[J].Acta Ecologica Sinica,2010,30(6):1628.
刘奎,何正峰,莫日彬,等.酸雨胁迫对桉树纯林及混交林土壤pH和酶活性的影响[J].防护林科技,2018(8):5.LIU Kui,HE Zhengfeng,MO Ribin,et al.Effects of acid rain stress on soil pH and enzyme activities of pure and mixed forest of Eucalyptus[J].Protection Forest Science and Technology,2018(8):5.
[4]
王楠,潘小承,白尚斌.模拟酸雨对我国亚热带毛竹林土壤呼吸及微生物多样性的影响[J].生态学报,2020,40(10):3420.WANG Nan,PAN Xiaocheng,BAI Shangbin.Effects of simulated acid rain on soil respiration and microbial diversity in Moso bamboo forest in subtropical China[J].Acta Ecologica Sinica,2020,40(10):3420.
[5]
MOLDOVAN C,SBIRNA S,IONESCU C,et al.Simulated impact of acid rain on organic matter,phosphorus and other soil components[J].Environmental Engineering and Management Journal,2014,13(6):1389.
[6]
王晖,郭霄,马翔,等.模拟酸雨对耐冬山茶生理生态学特征的影响[J].青岛农业大学学报(自然科学版),2022,39(1):43.WANG Hui,GUO Xiao,MA Xiang,et al.Effects of simulated acid rain on the ecophysiological characteristics of Camellia japonica (Naidong)[J].Journal of Qingdao Agricultural University (Natural Science),2022,39(1):43.
[7]
姚龙仁,王肖君,卓超,等.模拟酸雨对茶园土壤磷素溶出特征与形态的影响[J].浙江农业学报,2022,34(12):2700.YAO Longren,WANG Xiaojun,ZHUO Chao,et al.Effects of simulated acid rain on dissolution characteristics and fraction of phosphorus in tea garden soil[J].Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis,2022,34(12):2700.
[8]
LI Xinli,WANG Yunqi,ZHANG Ying,et al.Response of soil chemical properties and enzyme activity of four species in the Three Gorges Reservoir area to simulated acid rain[J].Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety,2021,208:111457.
[9]
杨凤,王云琦,王玉杰,等.酸雨胁迫对缙云山马尾松幼苗光合生理特性的影响[J].长江流域资源与环境,2022,31(1):124.YANG Feng,WANG Yunqi,WANG Yujie,et al.Effects of acid rain stress on photosynthetic physiological characteristics of Pinus massoniana seedlings in Jinyun Mountain[J].Resources and Environment in the Yangtze Basin,2022,31(1):124.
[10]
聂坤,徐明,文春玉,等.黔中地区不同林龄马尾松群落细根功能性状及其异速生长关系[J].西北林学院学报,2022,37(6):10.NIE Kun,XU Ming,WEN Chunyu,et al.Fine root functional traits and its allometric growth relationship of Pinus massoniana forests between different stand ages in central Guizhou[J].Journal of Northwest Forestry University,2022,37(6):10.
[11]
鲁如坤.土壤农业化学分析方法[M].北京:中国农业科技出版社,2000:13.LU Rukun.Methods of soil agricultural chemistry analysis[M].Beijing:China Agricultural Science and Technology Press,2000:13.
[12]
LI Weibin,JIN Changjie,GUAN Dexin,et al.The effects of simulated nitrogen deposition on plant root traits:A meta-analysis[J].Soil Biology and Biochemistry,2015,82:112.
[13]
赵文瑞.酸雨酸度和硫氮比对麻栎细根生长及其主要组成物质的影响[D].南京:南京林业大学,2017:55.ZHAO Wenrui.Effects of acid rain acidity and sulfur-nitrogen ration on the growth of fine root of Quercus acutissima and its main constituent[D].Nanjing:Nanjing Forestry University,2017:55.
[14]
刘俊英,王文颖,陈开华,等.土壤有机氮研究进展[J].安徽农业科学,2010,38(8):4148.LIU Junying,WANG Wenying,CHEN Kaihua,et al.Research progress on soil organic nitrogen[J].Journal of Anhui Agricultural Sciences,2010,38(8):4148.
[15]
孙水娟,文倩,谢平.酸雨对土壤质量影响的研究进展[J].安徽农业科学,2012,40(5):2774.SHUN Shuijuan,WEN Qian,XIE Ping.Research advance on effects of acid rain on soil quality[J].Journal of Anhui Agricultural Sciences,2012,40(5):2774.
[16]
梁国华,张德强,卢雨宏,等.鼎湖山季风常绿阔叶林土壤C∶N∶P生态化学计量特征对长期模拟酸雨的响应[J].生态环境学报,2018,27(5):844.LIANG Guohua,ZHANG Deqiang,LU Yuhong,et al.Responses of soil C∶N∶P stoichiometry to long-term simulated acid rain in a monsoon evergreen broad-leaved forest at Dinghushan Nature Reserve[J].Ecology and Environmental Sciences,2018,27(5):844.
[17]
KOERSELMAN W,MEULEMAN A F M.The vegetation N∶P ratio:A new tool to detect the nature of nutrient limitation[J].Journal Applied Ecology,1996,33(6):1441.
[18]
杜思垚,方娅婷,鲁剑巍.根系分泌物对作物养分吸收利用的影响研究进展[J].华中农业大学学报,2023,42(2):147.DU Siyao,FANG Yating,LU Jianwei.Progress on effects of root exudates on nutrient uptake and utilization of crops[J].Journal of Huazhong Agricultural University,2023,42(2):147.
[19]
王楠,潘小承,白尚斌,等.酸雨对毛竹入侵阔叶林缓冲区根系形态及分布格局的影响[J].生态学报,2020,40(13):4670.WANG Nan,PAN Xiaocheng,BAI Shangbin,et al.Effects of acid rain on root morphology and distribution pattern in the buffer zone of broad-leaved forest invaded by Moso bamboo[J].Acta Ecologica Sinica,2020,40(13):4670.
[20]
周钧.增氮减水对阔叶红松林草本植物生长策略的影响及机制[D].哈尔滨:黑龙江大学,2021:60.ZHOU Jun.Effect of nitrogen increase and water reduction on the growth strategy of herbaceous plants in broadleaf Pinus koraiensis forests and the mechanism[D].Harbin:Heilongjiang University,2021:60.
2023, Vol. 21 
