Abstract：[Background] Extensive mining in the Northwest arid desert area has caused serious ecological environment destruction. The ecological restoration of waste dump is very difficult. At present, the ecological restoration modes of waste dump restoration engineering is single and the matching measures are incomplete. Besides there is a shortage of ecological restoration modes which are suitable for the application of different site types in the Northwest arid desert area with well restoration effect. The purpose of this study is to systematically evaluate ecological restoration modes and pick out suitable ecological restoration modes for different site types. Besides we will make suggestions for each mode based on soil carbon storage; soil total nitrogen storage and C/N. [Methods] We investigated the vegetation growth status and soil physical and chemical properties of 14 restored waste dumps in Wuhai city. We selected 13 indices from vegetation restoration, soil modification and economic cost to construct evaluation system by the combination of component analysis and entropy weight. The evaluation system was then used to screen suitable ecological restoration modes. [Results] 1)The ecological restoration modes that are suitable for different site types consisted of interception and drainage measures and slope protection measures,i.e., gravel capping, Salix pammophila checkerboard, blanket covering, brick square/arch sash, dense mesh covering, ecological bag interception and drainage, dry masonry interception ditch, pipe drainage, and sowing. 2) Blanket covering+ecological bag drainage+sowing mode was suitable for both of medium layer steep shady-sunny slopes; medium layer turned-sharply shady-sunny slopes and medium layer steep shady slopes. 3) The recovery effect of the brick square/arch sash was slightly different, resulting from the difference of layout size and construction quality. [Conculsions] 1)The shady slope is more conducive to vegetation restoration, resulting from lower vegetation transpiration and less soil water consumption. 2) Compared with blanket covering mode, brick square/arch sash mode is more beneficial to organic carbon and nitrogen accumulation in the soil and reduce soil erosion. We screened 14 suitable ecological restoration modes for 9 site types from 23 modes which we investigated in the 14 waste dumps.
李青峰, 郭小平, 万亚俊, 薛心悦, 苏瑞东. 荒漠煤矿区排土场生态修复工程技术模式评价[J]. 中国水土保持科学, 2022, 20(6): 94-108.
LI Qingfeng, GUO Xiaoping, WAN Yajun, XUE Xinyue, SU Ruidong. Evaluation on the ecological restoration engineering modes of waste dump in the coal mine of desert area. SSWC, 2022, 20(6): 94-108.
吴钢, 魏东, 周政达, 等.我国大型煤炭基地建设的生态恢复技术研究综述[J]. 生态学报, 2014, 34(11): 2812. WU Gang, WEI Dong, ZHOU Zhengda, et al. A summary of study on ecological restoration technology of large coal bases construction in China [J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2014, 34(11): 2812.
[2]
吴维, 汪溪远, 师庆三, 等.不同生态恢复措施基于DEA模型的综合效率评价:以新疆准东矿区为例[J]. 矿业研究与开发, 2020, 40(10): 141. WU Wei, WANG Xiyuan, SHI Qingsan, et al. Comprehensive efficiency evaluation of different ecological restoration measures based on DEA model:Take Xinjiang Zhundong mining area as an example[J]. Mining Research and Development, 2020, 40(10): 141.
[3]
罗明, 周妍, 鞠正山, 等.粤北南岭典型矿山生态恢复工程技术模式与效益预评估:基于广东省山水林田湖草生态保护修复试点框架[J]. 生态学报, 2019, 39(23): 8911. LUO Ming, ZHOU Yan,JU Zhengshan, et al. Technological model and benefit pre-evaluation of CCO-environmental rehabilitation engineering of typical mines in the Nanling area of northern Guangdong province under the pilot framework of the eco-restoration of mountains-fivem-forests-farmlands-lakes-grasslands [J].Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2019, 39(23): 8911.
[4]
吕凯, 李雪飞, 智颖飙.露天煤矿排土场生物修复与生态重建技术[J]. 内蒙古师范大学学报, 2019, 48(5): 458. LÜ Kai, LI Xuefei, ZHI Yingbiao. Mechanism of phytoremediation and co-reconstruction for waste dump in open-cast collieries[J]. Journal of Inner Mongolia Normal University, 2019, 48(5): 458.
[5]
段新伟, 左伟芹, 杨韶昆,等.高寒缺氧矿区草原生态恢复探究:以青海省木里煤田为例[J]. 矿业研究与开发, 2020, 40(2): 156. DUAN Xinwei, ZUO Weiqin, YANG Shaokun, et al. Study on ecological restoration of grassland in alpine and anoxic mining areas: Taking the Muli coalfield in Qinghai province as an example[J]. Mining Research and Development, 2020, 40(2): 156.
[6]
董玉锟.内蒙露天煤矿排土场边坡抗冲性及减水减沙效益研究 [D].陕西杨凌:西北农林科技大学, 2015: 39. DONG Yukun. Study on effects of sand opencast coal mine in Inner Mongolia dump slope erosion resistance and reduction of water [D]. Yangling,Shaanxi: Northwest A&F University, 2015: 39.
[7]
孔令伟, 薛春晓, 苏凤, 等.不同建植技术对露天煤矿排土场生态恢复效果的影响及评价[J]. 水土保持研究, 2017, 24(1): 187. KONG Lingwei, XUE Chunxiao, SU Feng, et al. Evaluation and effect of different construction techniques on the ecological restoration of the stackpile in opencast coal mine[J]. Research of Soil and Water Conservation, 2017, 24(1): 187.
[8]
焦晓亮, 田金梅, 周永利.黄河流域露天矿排土场生态恢复评价[J]. 煤炭工程, 2020, 52(12): 74. JIAO Xiaoliang, TIAN Jinmei, ZHOU Yongli. Ecological restoration evaluation of coalmine dumps in Yellow River Basin [J]. Coal Engineering, 2020, 52(12): 74.
[9]
李全生, 韩兴, 赵英,等. 露天煤矿植被修复关键技术集成与应用研究:以胜利露天矿外排土场为例[J]. 环境生态学, 2021, 3(6): 47. LI Quansheng, HAN Xing, ZHAO Ying, et al. Research on the integration and application of key technologies of vegetation restoration in open-pit coal mine: A case study of external dump of Shengli opencast coal mine [J]. Environmental Ecology, 2021, 3(6): 47.
[10]
杨兆青, 陆兆华, 刘丹, 等. 煤炭资源型城市生态安全评价:以锡林浩特市为例[J]. 生态学报, 2021, 41(1): 280. YANG Zhaoqing, LU Zhaohua, LIU Dan, et al. Ecological security evaluation on the coal resource-based city:A case of Xilinhot City[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2021, 41(1): 280.
[11]
王广成,刘龙山. 基于DPSIR-TOPSIS模型的煤炭矿区绿色转型评价[J]. 经济管理, 2019, 45(4): 25. WANG Guangcheng, LIU Longshan. Assessment of green transformation of coal mining area based on DPSIR-TOPSIS model[J]. Economic Management, 2019, 45(4): 25.
[12]
徐建明. 土壤质量指标与评价[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 2010: 179. XU Jianming. Indices and assessment of soil quality[M]. Beijing: Science Press,2010: 179.
[13]
李磊, 贾磊, 赵晓雪, 等. 层次分析-熵值定权法在城市水环境承载力评价中的应用[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2014, 23(4): 456. LI Lei, JIA Lei, ZHAO Xiaoxue, et al. Application of the AHP and entropy weight method in evaluation on city water environmental carrying capacity[J]. Resources and Environment in the Yangtze Basin, 2014, 23(4): 456.
[14]
李炜,毕影东,刘建新,等.寒地野生大豆资源农艺性状的相关性和主成分分析[J].土壤与作物, 2022, 11(1): 10. LI Yi, BI Yingdong, LIU Jianxin, et al. Correlation and principal component analysis for agronomic traits of wild soybean in cold region[J]. Soil and Crop, 2022, 11(1): 10.
[15]
王超, 毕君, 尤海舟. 冀东地区铁矿废弃地生态治理效果评价研究[J]. 环境科学与技术, 2015, 38(12Q): 433. WANG Chao, BI Jun, YOU Haizhou. Evaluation on ecological restoration of iron mine wasteland in eastern Hebei province[J].Environmental Science ＆ Technology, 2015, 38(12Q): 433.
[16]
杨宇平,许丽,丰菲,等.基于植被重建的宁东矿区煤矸石山立地类型及其特征[J]. 水土保持通报,2020, 40(3): 202. YANG Yuping, XU Li, FENG Fei, et al. Site types and characteristics of coal gangue hill based on vegetation reconstruction in Ningdong mining area[J]. Bulletin of Soil and Water Conservation, 2020, 40(3): 202.
[17]
张晗, 欧阳真程, 赵小敏, 等.江西省不同农田利用方式对土壤碳、氮和碳氮比的影响[J]. 环境科学学报, 2018, 38(6): 2486. ZHANG Han, OUYANG Zhencheng, ZHAO Xiaomin, et al. Effects of different land use types on soil organic carbon, nitrogen and ratio of carbon to nitrogen in the plow layer of farmland soil in Jiangxi province[J]. Acta Scientiae Circumstantiae, 2018, 38(6): 2486.
[18]
赵建荣, 高德才, 汪建飞, 等.不同C/N下鸡粪麦秸高温堆肥腐熟过程研究[J]. 农业环境科学学报, 2011, 30(5): 1014. ZHAO Jianrong, GAO Decai, WANG Jianfei, et al. The high-rate composting of chicken manure and wheat straw in different C/N[J]. Journal of Agro-Environment Science, 2011, 30(5): 1014.
[19]
陈雅娟, 霍培书, 程旭艳, 等. 物料C/N对鸡粪锯末高温堆肥腐熟过程主要指标的影响研究[J]. 中国农业大学学报, 2012, 17(5): 118. CHEN Yajuan, HUO Peishu, CHENG Xuyan, et al. Effects of different C/N of composting materials on main indexes of high-temperature aerobic composting of chicken manure and sawdust[J]. Journal of China Agricultural University, 2012, 17(5): 118.
[20]
马若男, 李丹阳, 亓传仁,等.碳氮比对鸡粪堆肥腐熟度和臭气排放的影响[J]. 农业工程学报, 2020, 36(24): 194. MA Ruonan, LI Danyang, QI Chuanren, et al. Effects of C/N ratio on maturity and odor emissions during chicken manure composting[J]. Transactions of the CSAE, 2020, 36(24): 194.
[21]
薛东明. 干旱矿区排土场不同边坡生态恢复模式下减流减沙效益[J]. 水土保持学报, 2021,35(6):15. XUE Dongming. Runoff and sediment reduction under different slope ecological restoration modes of waste dump in arid mining area[J]. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 2021, 35(6): 15.
[22]
张倩, 孙小妹, 杨晶, 等. 坡向对东祁连山高寒草甸群落物种功能群及其多样性的影响[J]. 西北植物学报, 2019, 39(8): 1480. ZHANG Qian, SUN Xiaomei, YANG Jing, et al. Effect of aspect on species functional groups and species diversity in alpine meadow of the East of Qilian mountains[J]. Acta Botanica Boreali-Occidentalia Sinica, 2019, 39(8): 1480.
[23]
珊丹, 荣浩, 刘艳萍, 等.干旱荒漠区排矸场不同覆盖类型对土壤水分蒸发的影响[J]. 水土保持通报, 2020, 40(5): 15. SHAN Dan, RONG Hao, LIU Yanping, et al. Effects of different mulching modes on soil moisture evaporation at gangue fields in arid desert regions[J]. Bulletin of Soil and Water Conservation, 2020, 40(5): 15.
[24]
蔡旭东, 周怡雯, 刘窑军, 等. 南方红壤区坡耕地不同耕作措施综合生态效益评价[J]. 水土保持研究, 2020, 27(5): 281. CAI Xudong, ZHOU Yiwen, LIU Yaojun, et al. Evaluation on comprehensive ecological benefit of different tillage measures on sloping land in red soil area of South China[J]. Research of Soil and Water Conservation, 2020, 27(5): 281.
[25]
王磊, 索琳娜, 魏丹, 等. 不同植物配置模式坡耕地面源污染生态阻控特征[J]. 水土保持研究, 2021, 28(5): 29. WANG Lei, SUO Linna, WEI Dan, et al. Ecological control characteristics of non-point source pollution in slope farmland under different plant allocation modes [J]. Research of Soil and Water Conservation, 2021, 28(5): 29.
2022, Vol. 20 
