北京石质山区不同水土保持措施对土壤物理性质及抗冲性的影响——以房山区蒲洼小流域为例

doi:10.16843/j.sswc.2017.02.014

摘要
图/表
参考文献
相关文章 (15)

全文: HTML (1 KB)
输出: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

摘要为评价北京山区多年来小流域综合治理的水土保持效果，也为以后小流域治理和植被重建提供理论支撑，以房山区蒲洼小流域为研究地，采用典型样地调查、野外抗冲性实验和室内样品处理的方法，对比分析不同水土保持措施的土壤物理性质、土壤质地和抗冲性。结果表明：随着土层加深，各类措施下土壤密度均呈现增大趋势，总孔隙度和毛管孔隙度呈现减小趋势，而非毛管孔隙度没有明显规律。不同水土保持措施下，土壤密度、总孔隙度和毛管孔隙度均有改善（侧柏林除外），改善程度由好到差依次为：辽东栎次生林>油松落叶松混交林>石坎梯田>油松林>落叶松林>灌丛；各类措施下土壤颗粒均以细、中粉粒为最多，分形维数显示各类水保措施土壤通透性均较为良好；相比荒地，各类措施下土壤冲刷量显著减小，径流时间延长，冲刷量依次为油松落叶松混交林（0.82 kg/cm³）<侧柏林（1.14 kg/cm³）<落叶松林（1.30 kg/cm³）<辽东栎次生林（3.91 kg/cm³）<油松林（5.96 kg/cm³）<荆条灌丛（10.88 kg/cm³），延缓径流冲刷时间由大到小依次为：辽东栎次生林（55.65 s/m）>油松落叶松混交林（46.82 s/m）>落叶松（28.19 s/m）>荆条灌丛（22.39 s/m）>侧柏林（17.48 s/m）>油松林（16.94 s/m）。土壤抗冲性与细、中粉粒体积分数（正相关）、非毛管孔隙度呈显著（负相关）关系最为密切，由此推出大根径的根系穿插形成的非毛管孔隙对土壤抗冲性是负效应。综上，油松落叶松林混交林提升土壤蓄水持水性能、土壤抗冲性均显示出很大的优势；石坎梯田效果也较好，是小流域治理应首先考虑的2类措施。

	服务

	把本文推荐给朋友
	加入我的书架
	加入引用管理器
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	作者相关文章
	徐佳佳
	于占成
	史陇俊
	张小侠
	张建军

关键词 ：水土保持措施, 土壤物理性质, 抗冲性

Abstract：[Background] In order to evaluate the effect of soil and water conservation in small watershed management in Beijing mountainous area for many years, and to provide theoretical support for small watershed management and vegetation reconstruction in the future, taking Puwa small watershed of Fangshan District in Beijing as research target, soil physical properties, soil texture, infiltration and soil anti-scourability of all major kinds of soil and water conservation measures were studied. [Methods] The sample plots of 7 typical soil and water conservation measures was selected and investigated, and the data were acquired through typical plot survey, test of field soil anti-scourability, and method of single-ring. [Results] The soil density increased and soil porosity decreased significantly with the increasing of the soil depth. The soil density, total porosity and capillary porosity varied with the measures consistently. The order of effects on improving soil structure were Quercus liaotungensis secondary forest > Larix principis-rupprechtii and Pinus tabulaeformis mixed forest > terraces with stone banks> Pinus tabulaeformis forest > Larix principis-rupprechtii forest > vitex negundo shrub, while there was no significant effect for Platycladus orientailis forest. The soil particles in this area were mostly rich in powder, and the fractal dimension showed that the permeability of all kinds of soil and water conservation measures was promising. Compared with weed land, the scoured soil amount decreased significantly, the runoff time was prolonged, and the order of the scoured soil amount was as L. principis-rupprechtii and P. tabulaeformis mixed forest(0.82 kg/cm³)< P. orientailis forest(1.14 kg/cm³)< L. principis-rupprechtii forest(1.30 kg/cm³)< Q. liaotungensis secondary forest(3.91 kg/cm³)< P. tabulaeformis forest(5.96 kg/cm³)<vitex negundo shrub(10.88 kg/cm³), and the order of runoff scouring time was as Q. liaotungensis secondary forest(55.65 s/m)> L. principis-rupprechtii and P. tabuliformis mixed forest(46.82 s/m)> L. principis-rupprechtii forest(28.19 s/m)> vitex negundo shrub(22.39 s/m)> P. orientailis forest(17.48 s/m)> P. tabuliformis(16.94 s/m).The amount of soil loss showed a negative correlation with fine sand, medium silt, but a positive correlation with non-capillary porosity, indicating that the effect of non-capillary pore size formed by large diameter roots on soil erosion resistance might be negative. [Conclusions] In summary, the soil and water conservation capacity of the mixed forest of L. principis-rupprechtii and P. tabulaeformis shows a great advantage followed by terraces with stone banks which should be the principal consideration of small watershed management.

Key words： soil and water conservation measures soil physical properties soil anti-scourability

收稿日期: 2016-08-15

PACS:

S714.7

基金资助:北京市房山区小流域治理效益评价项目

通讯作者: 张建军(1963-),男,博士,教授。主要研究方向:水土保持与植被恢复、水文学等。E-mail:zhangjianjun@bjfu.edu.cn E-mail: zhangjianjun@bjfu.edu.cn

作者简介: 徐佳佳(1987-),女,博士研究生。主要研究方向:水植被恢复与森林水文。Email:xjj_xz@163.com

引用本文:

徐佳佳¹, 于占成^2,3, 史陇俊⁴, 张小侠⁴, 张建军^1,5. 北京石质山区不同水土保持措施对土壤物理性质及抗冲性的影响——以房山区蒲洼小流域为例[J]. 中国水土保持科学, 2017, 15(2): 107-114.
XU Jiajia, YU Zhancheng, SHI Longjun, ZHANG Xiaoxia, ZHANG Jianjun. Effects of soil and water conservation measures on soil physical properties and soil anti-scourability of Beijing mountainous area: A case study of the Puwa Watershed in Fangshan District. SSWC, 2017, 15(2): 107-114.

链接本文:

http://journal12.magtechjournal.com/Jweb_stbc/CN/10.16843/j.sswc.2017.02.014 或 http://journal12.magtechjournal.com/Jweb_stbc/CN/Y2017/V15/I2/107

[1]	薛萐,刘国彬,张超,等.黄土高原丘陵区坡改梯后的土壤质量效应[J].农业工程学报, 2011, 27(4): 310. XUE Sha, LIU Guobin, ZHANG Chao, et al. Effects of terracing slope cropland on soil quality in hilly region of the Loess Plateau [J]. Transactions of the CSAE, 2011, 27(4):310.
[2]	高志勤,傅懋毅.不同毛竹林土壤水分物理性质的特征比较[J].林业科技开发, 2005, 19(6): 13. GAO Zhiqin, FU Maoyi. A comparison of soil water-physical properties among various moso bamboo (phyllostachys edulis) plantations [J]. China Forestry Science and Technology, 2005, 19(6):13.
[3]	李勇,徐晓琴,朱显谟,等.植物根系与土壤抗冲性[J].水土保持学报, 1993, 7(3): 17. LI Yong, XU Xiaoqing, ZHU Xianmo, et al. Plant roots and soil anti-scourability [J]. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 1993, 7(3):17.
[4]	刘国彬.黄土高原草地土壤抗冲性及其机理研究[J].土壤侵蚀与水土保持学报, 1998, 4(1): 94. LIU Guobin.Study on soil anti-scourability and its mechanism of grassland on the Loess Plateau[J]. Journal of Soil Erosion and Soil and Water Conservation, 1998, 4(1):94.
[5]	解明曙.乔灌木根系固坡力学强度的有效范围与最佳组构方式[J].水土保持学报, 1990, 4(1): 17. XIE Mingshu. A study on determining the effective limits of the tree and bush roots strength and the best distribution of roots for stable slopes[J]. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 1990, 4(1):17.
[6]	雷俊山,杨勤科.坡面薄层水流侵蚀试验研究及土壤抗冲性评价[J].泥沙研究, 2004(6): 22. LEI Junshan, YANG Qinke. Experimental research on sheet flow erosion of loess slope and evaluation on soil anti-scourability[J]. Journal of Sediment Research, 2004(6):22.
[7]	蒋定生,李新华,范兴科,等.论晋陕蒙接壤地区土壤的抗冲性与水土保持措施体系的配置[J].水土保持学报, 1995, 9(1): 1. JIANG Dingsheng,LI Xinhua,FAN Xingke, et al. Discussion on soil anti-scouring properties and arrangement of soil and water conservation measure system in the contiguous areas of Shanxi,Shaanxi and Inner Mongolia[J]. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 1995, 9(1):1.
[8]	张建军,张宝颖,毕华兴,等.黄土区不同植被条件下的土壤抗冲性[J]. 北京林业大学学报, 2004, 26(6): 25. ZHANG Jianjun, ZHANG Baoying, BI Huaxing, et al. Soil erosion resistance of different land types in the Loess Plateau area[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2004, 26(6):25.
[9]	张建辉,刘刚才,倪师军,等. 紫色土不同土地利用条件下的土壤抗冲性研究[J].中国科学:E辑,2003, 33(增刊): 61. ZHANG Jianhui, LIU Gangcai, NI Shijun, et al. Soil anti-scourability of different land types in purple soil area [J]. Science China(E),2003,33(S0):61.
[10]	蒲玉琳,谢德体,倪九派,等.紫色土区植物篱模式对坡耕地土壤抗剪强度与抗冲性的影响[J].中国农业科学, 2014, 47(5): 934. PU Yulin, XIE Deti, NI Jiupai, et al. Effects of hedgerow patterns on soil shear strength and anti-scourability on slope farmland in purple soil area[J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2014, 47(5):934.
[11]	王国梁,周生路,赵其国.土壤颗粒的体积分形维数及其在土地利用中的应用[J].土壤学报, 2005, 42(4): 545. WANG Guoliang, ZHOU Shenlu, ZHAO Qiguo. Volume fractal dimension of soil particles and its applications to land use[J]. Acta Pedologica Sinica, 2005, 42(4):545.
[12]	杨培岭,罗远培,石元春.用粒径的重量分布表征的土壤分形特征[J].科学通报, 1993, 38(20): 1899. YANG Peiling, LUO Yuanpei, SHI Yuanchun. Fractal characteristics of soil by weight distribution of particle size [J]. Chinese Science Bulletin, 1993, 38(20):1899.
[13]	刘政鸿.陕北黄土高原主要成林乡土乔木树种的研究[D]. 陕西杨凌: 西北农林科技大学, 2003: 44. LIU Zhenghong. A study on major native forest tree species in the Loess Plateau[D]. Shanxi Yangling: Northwest A &F University, 2003:44.
[14]	鲁绍伟,陈波,潘青华,等.北京山地不同密度侧柏人工林枯落物及土壤水文效应[J]. 水土保持学报, 2013, 27(1): 228. LU Shaowei, CHEN Bo, PAN Qinghua, et al. Soil hydrological effects and forest litters of Platycladus orientalis plantation in the different densities in mountain of Beijing [J]. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 2013, 27(1):228.
[15]	聂立水,王登芝,王保国.北京戒台寺古油松生长衰退与土壤条件关系初步研究[J]. 北京林业大学学报, 2005, 27(5): 34. NIE Lishui, WANG Dengzhi, WANG Baoguo. Relationship between soil conditions and declining growth rate of aged Pinus tabulaeformis at Jietai Temple of Beijing[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2005, 27(5):34.
[16]	徐则民. 植被与斜坡非饱和带大空隙[J]. 地学前缘, 2007,14(6): 134. XU Zemin. Vegetation and macropores in vadose of hill slopes [J]. Earth Science Frontiers, 2007, 14(6): 134.
[17]	马兴旺,赵成义,李宁.退化草场恢复时土壤有机矿质复合体中结合态腐殖质变化[J].水土保持学报, 2000, 14(3): 22. MA Xingwang, ZHAO Chengyi, LI Ning. Variation of combined humus in soil organo-mineral complexes in process of grassland restoration [J].Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 2000, 14(3):22.
[18]	伏耀龙,张兴昌. 岷江干旱河谷区不同土地利用方式下土壤抗冲性试验[J].农业机械学报, 2012, 43(7): 53. FU Yaolong, ZHANG Xingchang. Anti-scourability of soil under different land use types in dry valley of Minjiang River [J].Transactions of the Chinese Society for Agricultural Machinery, 2012, 43(7):53.