Evaluation of eco-production value from Natural Forest Protection Program in Da Hinggan Mountains Forestry Group
HUANG Longsheng, WANG Bing, NIU Xiang, SONG Qingfeng
Research Institute of Forest Ecology, Environment and Protection, Chinese Academy of Forestry, Key Laboratory of Forest Ecology and Environment, State Forestry Administration, 100091, Beijing, China;Beijing Collaborative Innovation Center for Eco-environmental Improvement with Forestry and Fruit Trees, 102206, Beijing, China
Abstract：[Background] In the past forty years, the Chinese government has steadfastly implemented a series of major forestry ecological projects aimed at protecting the ecological environment, preventing soil erosion, resisting floods and other disasters, and increasing biodiversity. The Natural Forest Protection Program(NFPP) is one of them. The government has spent huge amount of investment for the project construction in the past 20 years, which has aroused widespread concern in the society. This paper is to reflect the ecological benefits of NFPP in China, incarnate the great role of ecological engineering, and realize the sustainable development of forestry.[Methods] Using the distributed measurement method and based on type Ⅱ survey data in Da Hinggan Mountains Forestry Group, the eco-production values of the NFPP in main vegetation types of the Da Hinggan Mountains Forestry Group were assessed according to the State Forest Ecosystem Services Assessment Specification (LY/T 1721-2008).[Results] 1) During the implementation of NFPP, the total value of eco-production increased by 1 851.62×108 RMB Yuan/a (an increment of 69.96%), and the descending order of values was biodiversity conservation (increased by 499.33×108 RMB Yuan/a), carbon fixation and oxygen released (increased by 390.22×108 RMB Yuan/a), soil conservation (increased by 358.62×108 RMB Yuan/a), water conservation (increased by 280.90×108 RMB Yuan/a),atmosphere environmental purifying (increased by 243.36×108 RMB Yuan/a), and nutrients accumulation (increased by 79.19×108 RMB Yuan/a). 2) The eco-production values of different forest stand types showed an increasing trend, the highest increased value of Larix gmelini eco-production was 53.29%, the order of added value in forest stand from high to low was Larix spp.(an increment of 53.29%), Betula spp.(an increment of 13.01%), Populus spp. (an increment of 2.19%), Querus spp.(an increment of 0.66%), Pinus sylvestris var. mongolica (an increment of 0.41%), Picea spp. (an increment of 0.25%) and Salix babylonica L. (an increment of 0.15%). 3) The increment of the eco-production value of half-mature forest was up to 66.05%, followed by the young forest increased by 17.22%. In addition, the eco-production value of near-mature forest, mature forest and over-mature forest showed a decreasing trend. 4) Reasonable and effective implementation of forest protection will make the forest volume and ecological productivity have great growth space, and the ecological productivity of forest areas has great potential for development.[Conclusions] Therefore, the implementation of NFPP plays a positive role in promoting the ecological productivity value of different forest types in the study area. The composition and proportion of different age forest groups in the study area were affected, which led to the growth and decline of the ecological productivity value of different age groups. Furthermore, the implementation of the NFPP will play a significant positive role in improving the ecological environment in the study area. Accordingly, this study will provide scientific reference for evaluating the changes of forest ecological service function and analyzing the ecological benefits of NFPP area in China.
黄龙生, 王兵, 牛香, 宋庆丰. 大兴安岭林业集团天然林资源保护工程生态产能价值分析[J]. 中国水土保持科学, 2018, 16(1): 141-148.
HUANG Longsheng, WANG Bing, NIU Xiang, SONG Qingfeng. Evaluation of eco-production value from Natural Forest Protection Program in Da Hinggan Mountains Forestry Group. SSWC, 2018, 16(1): 141-148.
马姜明,刘世荣,史作明,等.退化森林生态系统恢复评价研究综述[J].生态学报,2010,30(12):3297. MA Jiangming, LIU Shirong, SHI Zuoming, et al. A review on restoration evaluation studies of degraded forest ecosystem[J].Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2010,30(12):3297.
[2]
刘世荣.天然林生态恢复的原理与技术[M].北京:中国林业出版社,2011:1. LIU Shirong. Ecological restoration principle and techniques of natural forests[M].Beijing:China Forestry Publishing House, 2011:1.
[3]
宋庆丰,牛香,王兵.黑龙江省森林资源生态产品产能[J].生态学杂志, 2015,34(6):1480. SONG Qingfeng, NIU Xiang, WANG Bing. Eco-product production capacity of forest resources of Heilongjiang Province[J]. Chinese Journal of Ecology, 2015, 34(6):1480.
[4]
LIU Jianguo, LI Shuxin, OUYANG Zhiyun, et al. Ecological and socioeconomic effects of China's policies for ecosystem services[J]. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2008, 105(28):9477.
[5]
VIÑA A, McCONNELL W J, YANG Hongbo, et al. Effects of conservation policy on China's forest recovery[J]. Science Advances, 2016, 2(3):e1500965.
[6]
KE S F, CHEN Z C, Robson M, et al. Evaluating the implementation efficiency of the Natural Forest Protection Program in ten provinces of western China by using Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA)[J]. International Forestry Review, 2015, 17(4):469.
[7]
REN G, Young S S, WANG L, et al. Effectiveness of China's national forest protection program and nature reserves[J]. Conservation Biology, 2015, 29(5):1368.
[8]
刘璨,孟庆华,李育明,等.我国天然林保护工程对区域经济与生态效益的影响[J].生态学报,2005,25(3):428. LIU Can, MENG Qinghua, LI Yuming, et al. A case study on ecological and socioeconomic benefit evaluation of Sichuan provincial natural forest protective project[J].Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2005,25(3):428.
[9]
国政,聂华,臧润国,等.西南地区天然林保护工程生态效益评价[J].内蒙古农业大学学报(自然科学版),2011,32(2):65. GUO Zheng, NIE Hua, ZANG Runguo, et al. Eco-benefit evaluation on natural forest protection project in Southwest China[J].Journal of Inner Mongolia Agricultural University(Natural Sciences),2011,32(2):65.
[10]
王兵,杨锋伟,郭浩.森林生态系统服务功能评估规范:LY/T 1721-2008[S].北京:中国标准出版社,2008:4. WANG Bing, YANG Fengwei, GUO Hao, et al. Specifications for assessment of forest ecosystem services in China:LY/T 1721-2008[S].Beijing:China Standards Press,2008:4.
[11]
中华人民共和国水利部.水利建筑工程预算定额[M].郑州:黄河水利出版社,2002:1. The Ministry of Water Resources of the People's Republic of China. Quotas of water conservancy construction project budget[M]. Zhengzhou:The Yellow River Water Conservancy Press,2002:1.
[12]
崔民选,王军生,陈义和.中国能源发展报告:2013版[M].北京:社会科学文献出版,2013:10. CUI Minxuan, WANG Junsheng, CHEN Yihe. China energy development report[M]. Beijing:Social Sciences Academic Press, 2013:10.
[13]
ALLIE G, KELLEY H. State of the voluntary carbon markets 2013[R/OL]. (2013-06-20)[2017-06-10]. http://www.Forest-trends.org/documents/files/doc_3898.pdf
[14]
中华人民共和国国家统计局.中国统计年鉴:2015[M]. 北京:中国统计出版社,2015:79. National Bureau of Statistics of the People's Republic of China. China statistical yearbook:2015[M]. Beijing:China StatisticsPress, 2015:79.
[15]
中华人民共和国水利部.中国水土保持公报:2014[R/OL].[2017-06-10].http://www.mwr.gov.cn/zwzc/hygb/zgstbcgb/201601/P020160113554735781575.pdf. The Ministry of Water Resources of the People's Republic of China. Bulletin of China's soil and water conservation(2014)[R/OL].[2017-06-10].http://www.mwr.gov.cn/zwzc/hygb/zgstbcgb/201601/P020160113554735781575.pdf.
[16]
中华人民共和国卫生部.中国卫生统计年鉴:2012[M].北京:中国协和医科大学出版社,2012:33. National Health and Family Planning Commission of the People's Republic of China. China health statistical yearbook:2012[M]. Beijing:Peking Union Medical College Press, 2012:33.
[17]
国家林业局. 森林生态系统生物多样性监测与评估规范:LY/T 2241-2014[S]. 北京:中国标准出版社,2014:1. The State Forestry Administration of the People's Republic of China. Forest ecosystem biodiversity monitoring and assessment criteria:LY/T 2241-2014[S]. Beijing:Standards Press of China, 2014:1.
[18]
NIU Xiang, WANG Bing, WEI Wenjun. Chinese forest ecosystem research network:a plat form for observing and studying sustainable forestry[J]. Journal of Food, Agriculture & Environment, 2013, 11(2):1008.
[19]
李世东,陈幸良,李金华.世界重点生态工程与林业机构设置的关系研究[J].世界林业研究,2003,16(3):7. LI Shidong, CHEN Xinliang, LI Jinhu. Research on the relationship between world key ecological projects and the allocation of forestry organizations[J]. World Forestry Research, 2003,16(3):7.
2018, Vol. 16 
