Journal
Objective To investigate the patient and treatment related predictors for the development of radiation induced lung toxicity (RILT) in patients with locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) receiving definitive three-dimensional radiotherapy. Methods Data were retrospectively collected from inoperable or unresectable 253 patients with stage Ⅲ NSCLC treated with definitive three-dimensional radiotherapy between January 2001 and April 2007. National cancer institute common toxicity criteria version 3.0 was employed to evaluate the classification of RILT and grade ≥2 toxicity served as the endpoint. The correlation between RILT and aforementioned factors was analyzed. Results The grade ≥ 2 RILT was 26.5%. Univariate analysis showed age, FEV1%, DLCO%, contralateral lung (CL) V5-V15,ipsilateral lung (IL) V5-V40, total lung (TL) V5-V50, IL and TL mean lung dose (MLD) were significantly correlated with the development of RILT (χ2=4.46-23.99,P=0.000-0.035). Mmultivariate analysis showed TL MLD>17.5 Gy and FEV1%≥72% were significantly correlated with the development of RILT (χ2=17.49,9.30,P=0.000,0.002). Patients were stratified into four groups according to MLD and FEV1%, corresponding to the RILT incidence of 9.3%, 24.7%, 38.5% and 63.6%, respectively (χ2=25.27,P=0.000). Conclusions TL MLD and baseline FEV1% are significant factors correlated with the development of RILT in NSCLC patients treated with three-dimensional radiation therapy. The combination of TL MLD and FEV1% may help classify NSCLC patients per risk of RILT and subsequently direct risk-adaptive radiation therapy. Poor baseline pulmonary function does not increase the risk of RILT and may even be associated with lower RILT probability, whichhas yet to be validated in larger patient cohorts.
Objective To investigate the influence of endorectal balloon on normal tissue dosimetry in prostate cancer patients treated with intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT). Methods Ten patients with prostate cancer were included and each had two sets of planning CT-scans:one with and one without an air-filled endorectal balloon. Target volumes and organs at risk (rectum,bladder,femoral heads) were contoured on the 20 CT scans and IMRT plannings were performed. The prescription dose was 78 Gy to 95% of planning target volume. The percentage of volume of organs at risk (without or with endorectal balloon) receiving more than 10 Gy, 20 Gy, 30 Gy, 40 Gy, 50 Gy, 60 Gy, 70 Gy and 75 Gy (V10-V70, in increments of 10 Gy, and V75) were analyzed. Results The V10-V60 of rectum with endorectal balloon were 75.5%, 52.6%, 35.3%, 26.1%, 19.6%, 14.2%,and those without endorectal balloon were 82.2%, 62.8%, 43.9%, 31.4%, 24.0%, 17.1%, respectively (χ2=9.46,P<0.01).Use of endorectal balloon significantly reduced the dose to the rectum (V10-V60). The V70 and V75 of rectum with endorectal balloon were 9.1% and 8.2%;and those without endorectal balloon were 9.9% and 6.2% respectively (χ2=1.82,P>0.05).The difference was not significant. There were nosignificant differences in the dose tobladder,left and right femoral head between patients with and without endorectal balloon. Conclusions Endorectal balloon can significantly decrease the medium and low dose volume of rectum for prostate cancer patients treated with IMRT, which may reduce the rectal toxicity.
Objective To quantitatively evaluate the image quality, stability and volume precision in kilovoltage cone beam CT (CBCT) on Varian linear accelerator. Methods The Catphan600 phantom was repeatedly scanned in the full-fan and half-fan CBCT scanning modes. A simulation fan-beam CT (FBCT) was used as a benchmark and results related to the low contrast resolution, spatial resolution, uniformity and image noise were compared with the CBCT using the treatment planning system. The comparison of image quality and long-term stability and volume precision was analyzed. Results Spatial resolution was no differences observed between FBCT and CBCT (6 lp/cm∶6 lp/cm,T=18.00, P>0.05). Low contrast resolution was, on average, 1.65% and 1.74% for both CBCTFull-Fan and CBCTHalf-Fan, and 1.03% for the FBCT (T=6.00, P<0.05). Uniformity was, on average, 0.005 and 0.033 for both, and 0.003 for the FBCT (T=6.00, P<0.05). In terms of image noise, the FBCT images were superior to the CBCT (T=30.00, P<0.05). In valid scan range of the CBCT, reconstructed precision was high. There was no significant time trend in the image quality. Conclusions The image quality of kilovoltage CBCT is inferior to the conventional CT. However, tumor and soft tissues are visible in the CBCT images. The image stability and reconstructed precision is satisfying.
News
Cooperation unit