局部进展期直肠癌术前3DCRT与VMAT同期化疗远期疗效比较

doi:10.3760/cma.j.cn113030-20200313-00106

Abstract
Figure/Table
References()
Related Citation (15)
Read Tracking
Download Tracking

Download: PDF (0 KB) HTML (1 KB)
Export: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS) Supporting Info

Abstract Objective To compare 5-year overall survival (OS) and disease free survival (DFS) between preoperative three dimensional conformal radiotherapy (3DCRT) and volumetric medulated arc therapy (VMAT) concurrently combined with chemotherapy for locally advanced rectum cancer (LARC), and analyze the value of induction and/or consolidation chemotherapy in these circumstances. Methods 334 patients with LARC treated with preoperative 3DCRT (172 cases) and VMAT (162 cases) concurrently combined with chemotherapy, main protocol XELOX (capecitabine plus oxaplatin), and subsequent surgery in Sun Yat-sen University from May 2007 to April 2013 were retrospectively analyzed. The radiation prescription dose for VMAT group was 50Gy 25 fractions for planning target volume1(PTV1), and 46Gy 25 fractions for PTV2. The radiation prescription dose for 3DCRT group was 46Gy 23 fractions for PTV2. One hundred and eighty-five cases of all received preoperative concurrent chemoradiotherapy (namely, CCRT group), 149 cases received preoperative concurrent chemoradiotherapy plus median 2 courses (1-7 courses) induction and/or consolidation chemotherapy (namely, CCRT±induction chemotherapy±consolidation chemotherapy group), whose main chemotherapy protocol was XELOX. Difference of 5-year OS and DFS between 3DCRT and VMAT group was compared. The rate differences of acute toxicity during chemoradiotherapy, postoperative complications, ypCR, and survival between CCRT group and CCRT±induction chemotherapy±consolidation chemotherapy group were analyzed. Results After a median follow-up of 62.3 months (2.4-119months) for the 334 patients, no any significant difference for 5-year OS (79.0% vs. 83.2%, P=0.442) and 5-year DFS (77.0% vs. 82.1%, P=0.231) between 3DCRT and VMAT group was observed. There was no any significant difference for the Grade 3hematological toxicity (7.0% vs. 12.1%,P=0.114) and non-hematological toxicity (14.1% vs. 16.8%,P=0.491) during chemoradiotherapy, postoperative complications (17.3% vs. 17.4%,P=0.971), ypCR rate (25.4% vs. 30.2%,P=0.329), 5-year OS (80.5% vs. 82.0%,P=0.714) and 5-year DFS (78.8% vs. 81%,P=0.479) between CCRT group and CCRT±induction chemotherapy±consolidation chemotherapy group. Conclusions Compared with 3DCRT, the physics advantage of VMAT technique does not significantly convert into clinical benefits and improve 5-year OS and DFS, even further boosting radiation dose to the gross tumor volume. It is safe for median 2 courses of induction and/or consolidation chemotherapy before and or after preoperative concurrent chemoradiotherapy in the treatment of LARC, though it does not significantly improve ypCR rate and survival.

	Service

	E-mail this article
	Add to my bookshelf
	Add to citation manager
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	Articles by authors
	Xiao Lin
	Deng Wenjing
	Wei Jiawang
	Xiao Weiwei
	Wang Qiaoxuan
	Zeng Zhifan
	Liu Mengzhong
	Gao Yuanhong

Key words： Locally advanced rectum cancer/three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy Locally advanced rectum cancer/volumetric modulated arc therapy Locally advanced rectum cancer/chemotherapy Prognosis Adverse reaction

Received: 13 March 2020

Corresponding Authors: Gao Yuanhong, Email:gaoyh@sysucc.org.cn

Cite this article:

Xiao Lin,Deng Wenjing,Wei Jiawang et al. Preoperative three dimensional conformal radiotherapy and volumetric modulated arc therapy concurrently combined with chemotherapy for locally advanced rectum cancer:a five-year follow-up study[J]. Chinese Journal of Radiation Oncology, 2021, 30(2): 127-133.

URL:

http://journal12.magtechjournal.com/Jweb_fszlx/EN/10.3760/cma.j.cn113030-20200313-00106 OR http://journal12.magtechjournal.com/Jweb_fszlx/EN/Y2021/V30/I2/127

[1] NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology-rectal cancer, Version 2(2019)[DB/OL][2020-03-10]. http:// www. nccn. org.
[2] Bosset JF, Calais G, Daban A, et al. Preoperative chemoradiotherapy versus preoperative radiotherapy in rectal cancer patients:assessment of acute toxicity and treatment compliance. Report of the 22921 randomised trial conducted by the EORTC Radiotherapy Group[J]. Eur J Cancer, 2004, 40(2):219-224. DOI:10.1016/j.ejca.2003.09.032.
[3] FlemingâFJ,Pâhlman L, Monson JR, et al. Neoadjuvant therapy in rectal cancer[J]. Dis Colon Rectum, 2011, 54(7):901-912. DOI:10.1007/DCR.0b013e31820eeb37.
[4] Regnier A, Ulbrich J, Munch S, et al. Comparative analysis of efficacy, toxicity, and patient-reported outcomes in rectal cancer patients undergoing preoperative 3D conformal radiotherapy or VMAT[J]. Front Oncol, 2017, 7:225. DOI:10.3389/fonc.2017.00225.
[5] van Gijn W, Marijnen CA, Nagtegaal ID, et al. Preoperative radiotherapy combined with total mesorectal excision for resectable rectal cancer:12-year follow-up of the multicentre, randomised controlled TME trial[J]. Lancet Oncol, 2011, 12(6):575-582. DOI:10.1016/S1470-2045(11)70097-3.
[6] Sauer R, Liersch T, Merkel S, et al. Preoperative versus postoperative chemoradiotherapy for locally advanced rectal cancer:results of the German CAO/ARO/AIO-94 randomized phase Ⅲ trial after a median follow-up of 11 years[J]. J Clin Oncol, 2012, 30(16):1926-1933. DOI:10.1200/JCO.2011.40.1836.
[7] Corner C, Khimji F, Tsang Y, et al. Comparison of conventional and three dimensional conformal CT planning techniques for preoperative chemoradiotherapy for locally advanced rectal cancer[J]. Br J Radiol, 2011, 84(998):173-178. DOI:10.1259/bjr/33089685.
[8] Arbea L, Ramos LI, Martínez-Monge R, et al. Intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) vs. 3D conformal radiotherapy (3DCRT) in locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC):dosimetric comparison and clinical implications[J]. Radiat Oncol, 2010,5:17. DOI:10.1186/1748-717X-5-17.
[9] Richetti A, Fogliata A, Clivio A, et al. Neoadjuvant chemoradiation of rectal cancer with volumetric modulated arc therapy:summary of technical and dosimetric features and early clinical experience[J]. Radiat Oncol, 2010, 5:14. DOI:10.1186/1748-717X-5-14.
[10] Jabbour SK, Patel S, Herman JM, et al. Intensity modulated radiation therapy for rectal carcinoma can reduce treatment breaks and emergency department visits[J]. Int J Surg Oncol, 2012, 2012:891067. DOI:10.1155/2012/891067.
[11] Ng SY, Colborn KL, Cambridge L, et al. Acute toxicity with intensity modulated radiotherapy versus 3-dimensional conformal radiotherapy during preoperative chemo-radiation for locally advanced rectal cancer[J]. Radiother Oncol, 2016, 121(2):252-257. DOI:10.1016/j.radonc.2016.09.010.
[12] Hong TS, Moughan J, Garofalo MC, et al. NRG Oncology radiation therapy oncology group 0822:a phase 2 study of preoperative chemoradiation therapy using intensity modulated radiation therapy combination with capecitabine and oxaliplatin for patients with locally advanced rectal cancer[J]. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys, 2015, 93(1):29-36. DOI:10.1016/j.ijrobp.2015.05.005.
[13] Carvalho C, Glynne-Jones R. Challenges behind proving efficacy of adjuvant chemotherapy after preoperative chemoradiation for rectal cancer[J]. Lancet Oncol, 2017, 18(6):e354-e363. DOI:10.1016/S1470-2045(17)30346-7.
[14] Gao YH, Lin JZ, An X, et al. Neoadjuvant sandwich treatment with oxaliplatin and capecitabine aDministered prior to, concurrently with, and following radiation therapy in locally advanced rectal cancer:a prospective phase 2 trial[J]. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys, 2014, 90(5):1153-1160. DOI:10.1016/j.ijrobp.2014.07.021.
[15] Garcia-Aguilar J, Chow OS, Smith DD, et al. Effect of adding mFOLFOX6 after neoadjuvant chemoradiation in locally advanced rectal cancer:a multicentre, phase 2 trial[J]. Lancet Oncol, 2015, 16(8):957-966. DOI:10.1016/S1470-2045(15)00004-2.
[16] FokasäE, Allgäuer M, Polat B, et al. Randomized phase Ⅱ trial of chemoradiotherapy plus induction or consolidation chemotherapy as total neoadjuvant therapy for locally advanced rectal cancer:CAO/ARO/AIO-12[J]. J Clin Oncol, 2019, 37(34):3212-3222. DOI:10.1200/JCO.19.00308.
[17] 肖林,余昕,祝喻甲,等. 术前三维适形放疗与容积调强弧形治疗同期联合化疗在局部进展期直肠癌中应用的近期效果比较[J]. 中华胃肠外科杂志, 2016, 19(7):769-775. DOI:10.3760/cma.j.issn.1671-0274.2016.07.011.
Xiao L, Yu X, Zhu YJ, et al. Short-term efficacy comparison between preoperative three dimensional conformal radiotherapy and volumetric modulated arc therapy concurrently combined with chemotherapy in the treatment of locally advanced rectal carcinoma[J]. Chin J Gastrointest Surg, 2016, 19(7):769-775. DOI:10.3760/cma.j.issn.1671-0274.2016.07.011.
[18] 肖林,黄蓉,游凯云,等. 容积调强弧形放疗联合Xelox化疗方案应用于局部进展期直肠癌新辅助治疗的可行性研究[J]. 中华胃肠外科杂志, 2014, 17(3):219-224. DOI:10.3760/cma.j.issn.1671-0274.2014.03.005.
Xiao L, Huang R, You KY, et al. Feasibility study on Xelox (capecitabine plus oxapliplatin) in the volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT)-based preoperative chemoradiotherapy for locally advanced rectal cancer[J]. Chin J Gastrointest Surg, 2014, 17(3):219-224. DOI:10.3760/cma.j.issn.1671-0274.2014.03.005.
[19] 肖林,黄蓉,游凯云,等. 局部进展期直肠癌术前新辅助放化疗中VMAT的可行性研究[J]. 中华放射肿瘤学杂志, 2014, 23(1):9-13. DOI:10.3760/cma.j.issn.1004-4221.2014.01.003.
Xiao L, Huang R, You KY, et al. Study on feasibility of preoperative neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy based on volumetric modulated arc therapy for locally advanced rectal cancer[J]. Chin J Gastrointest Surg, 2014, 23(1):9-13. DOI:10.3760/cma.j.issn.1004-4221.2014.01.003.
[20] Zhu J, Liu A, Sun X, et al. Multicenter, randomized, phase Ⅲ trial of neoadjuvant chemoradiation with capecitabine and irinotecan guided by UGT1A1 status in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer[J]. J Clin Oncol, 2020:JCO2001932. DOI:10.1200/JCO.20.01932.
[21] Teo MTW, McParland L, Appelt AL, et al. Phase 2 neoadjuvant treatment intensification trials in rectal cancer:a systematic review[J]. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys, 2018, 100(1):146-158. DOI:10.1016/j.ijrobp.2017.09.042.
[22] Smith JJ, Strombom P, Chow OS, et al. Assessment of a watch-and-wait strategy for rectal cancer in patients with a complete response after neoadjuvant therapy[J]. JAMA Oncol, 2019, 5(4):e185896. DOI:10.1001/jamaoncol.2018.5896.
[23] Azria D, Doyen J, Jarlier M, et al. Late toxicities and clinical outcome at 5 years of the ACCORD12/0405-PRODIGE 02 trial comparing two neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy regimes for intermediate risk rectal cancer[J]. Ann Oncol, 2017, 28(10):2436-2442. DOI:10.1093/annonc/mdx351.
[24] Fernández-Martos C, Pericay C, Aparicio J, et al. Phase Ⅱ, randomized study of concomitant chemoradiotherapy followed by surgery and adjuvant capecitabine plus oxaliplatin (CAPOX) compared with induction CAPOX followed by concomitant chemoradiotherapy and surgery in magnetic resonance imaging-defined, locally advanced rectal cancer:grupo cancer de recto 3 study[J]. J Clin Oncol, 2010, 28(5):859-865. DOI:10.1200/JCO.2009.25.8541.
[25] Fernandez-Martos C, Garcia-Albeniz X, Pericay C, et al. Chemoradiation, surgery and adjuvant chemotherapy versus induction chemotherapy followed by chemoradiation and surgery:long-term results of the Spanish GCR-3 phase Ⅱ randomized trial[J]. Ann Oncol, 2015, 26(8):1722-1728. DOI:10.1093/annonc/mdv223.
[26] 欧阳淦露,孟文建,舒佩,等. 全程新辅助治疗在高危局部晚期直肠癌患者中的疗效和安全性分析[J]. 中华胃肠外科杂志, 2019, 22(4):349-356. DOI:10.3760/cma.j.issn.1671?0274.2019.04.007.
Ouyang GL, Meng WJ, Shu P, et al. Analysis on efficacy and safety of total neoadjuvant therapy in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer with high risk factors[J]. Chin J Gastrointest Surg, 2019, 22(4):349-356. DOI:10.3760/cma.j.issn.1671?0274.2019.04.007.