西门子Sensation Open CT模拟机CT值稳定性分析

doi:10.3760/cma.j.issn.1004-4221.2017.12.011

Abstract
Figure/Table
References()
Related Citation (15)
Read Tracking
Download Tracking

Download: PDF (881 KB) HTML (1 KB)
Export: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS) Supporting Info

Abstract Objective To evaluate the constancy of CT numbers of SIEMENS Sensation Open CT-simulator by analyzing the CT numbers of seven materials obtained from quality assurance (QA) tests. Methods QA tests for SIEMENS Sensation Open CT-simulator were performed with the Catphan504 phantom monthly. The CT images were obtained using three scan protocols (HeadSeq,RT_Head,and RT_Abdomen) for the CTP404 module in the phantom. The DoseLab software was used to analyze the 72 CT images acquired from January 2014 to December 2015,and the CT numbers (Y) of seven materials were obtained. Statistical analysis was performed on the Y data. The mean,standard deviation,maximum,minimum,and range values of Y for seven materials were calculated in three scan protocols. Results The standard deviation values of air,polymethylpentene,low-density polyethylene,polystyrene,acrylic acid,polyoxymethylene resin (Delrin),and polytetrafluoroethylene (Teflon) were as follows:(1) HeadSeq:0.54,0.60,0.82,0.58,0.75,0.66,and 1.83 HU;(2) RT_Head:0.08,0.69,0.86,0.66,0.80,0.89,and 2.49 HU;(3) RT_Abdomen:0.11,0.61,0.76,0.72,0.78,0.96,and 2.56 HU. According to the statistical data,the constancy of CT numbers of the SIEMENS Sensation Open CT-simulator was in good condition in two years. Conclusions The variation of CT numbers of Teflon is the biggest among the seven materials. The relative values of CT numbers between different scan protocols vary with the relative electron density of materials.

	Service

	E-mail this article
	Add to my bookshelf
	Add to citation manager
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	Articles by authors
	Shi Feiyue
	Ren Jun
	Wu Zhengcan
	Qin Wei
	Yin Xindao

Key words： Tomography,X-ray Computed Quality control Constancy Catphan phantom

Received: 15 November 2016

Fund:Jiangsu Province University Natural Science Research Project on the Surface (15KJB360004)

Corresponding Authors: Yin Xindao,Email:y.yy163@163.com

Cite this article:

Shi Feiyue,Ren Jun,Wu Zhengcan et al. Study on constancy of CT numbers of SIEMENS Sensation Open CT-simulator[J]. Chinese Journal of Radiation Oncology, 2017, 26(12): 1407-1410.

URL:

http://journal12.magtechjournal.com/Jweb_fszlx/EN/10.3760/cma.j.issn.1004-4221.2017.12.011 OR http://journal12.magtechjournal.com/Jweb_fszlx/EN/Y2017/V26/I12/1407

[1] 甘晓根,徐子海,廖福锡,等.西门子SOMATOM OPEN CT简介及在放射治疗中的优势[J].中国医疗设备,2011,26(3):100-101,96.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1674-1633.2011.03.036.
Gan XG,Xu ZH,Liao FX,et al. Introduction of Siemens SOMATOM OPEN CT system and its advantages in radiation therapy[J].China Med Dev,2011,26(3):100-101,96.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1674-1633.2011.03.036.
[2] 张富利,陈建平,郑明民.PHILIPS大孔径CT模拟机噪声测试研究[J].中国医疗设备,2009,24(1):123-124.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1674-1633.2009.01.059.
Zhang FL,Chen JP,Zheng MM.Measurement of image noise for Philips large bore CT-Simulator[J].China Med Dev,2009,24(1):123-124.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1674-1633.2009.01.059.
[3] 陈健铃,赵云辉,陈传本,等.利用CT模拟机重建图像分析鼻咽癌摆位重复性[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2012,29(3):3346-3349.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2012.03.002.
Chen JL,Zhao YH,Chen CB,et al. Analyze positioning repeatability of nasopharyngeal carcinoma by reconstruction image using CT simulator[J].Chin J Med Phys,2012,29(3):3346-3349.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2012.03.002.
[4] 赵永亮,储开岳,吴建亭,等.胸腹部肿瘤患者放疗体位固定参考等中心与治疗等中心空间距离与后续治疗时摆位误差关系[J].中华放射肿瘤学杂志,2015,24(1):53-54.DOI:10.3760/cma.j.issn.1004-4221.2015.01.015.
Zhao YL,Chu KY,Wu JT,et al. Association of distance between fixed reference isocenter and treatment center with set-up errors in radiotherapy of patients with thoracic and abdominal tumor[J].Chin J Radiat Oncol,2015,24(1):53-54.DOI:10.3760/cma.j.issn.1004-4221.2015.01.015.(未找到本条文献英文信息,请核对)
[5] Mutic S,Palta JR,Butker EK,et al. Quality assurance for computed-tomography simulators and the computed-tomography-simulation process:report of the AAPM radiation therapy committee task group No.66[J].Med Phys,2003,30(10):2762-2792.DOI:10.1118/1.1609271.
[6] 邓小武,黄劭敏,祁振宇.CT模拟机的QC和质量保证检验[J].中国肿瘤,2004,13(9):546-550.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1004-0242.2004.09.003.
Deng XW,Huang SM,Qi ZY.Quality control and quality assuring requirements of CT-simulator[J].Bull Chin Cancer,2004,13(9):546-550.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1004-0242.2004.09.003.
[7] 祁振宇,黄劭敏,邓小武.放疗计划CT值的校准检测及其影响因素分析[J].癌症,2006,25(1):110-114.DOI:10.3321/j.issn:1000-467X.2006.01.024.
Qi ZY,Huang SM,Deng XW.Calibration of CT values used for radiation treatment planning and its impact factors[J].Chin J Cancer,2006,25(1):110-114.DOI:10.3321/j.issn:1000-467X.2006.01.024.
[8] 彭文献,彭天舟,叶小琴,等.CT扫描参数对人体组织CT值影响的研究[J].中华放射医学与防护杂志,2010,30(1):79-81.DOI:10.3760/cma.j.issn.0254-5098.2010.01.026.
Peng WX,Peng TZ,Ye XQ,et al. Effect of CT scanning parameters on CT number[J].Chin J Radiol Med Prot,2010,30(1):79-81.DOI:10.3760/cma.j.issn.0254-5098.2010.01.026.
[9] 廖雄飞,黎杰,王培.CT模拟定位机的扫描参数对放疗计划系统剂量计算的影响[J].肿瘤预防与治疗,2015,28(1):49-51.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1674-0904.2015.01.011.
Liao XF,Li J,Wang P.The effect of CT simulator scanning parameters on dose calculating in treatment planning system (TPS)[J].J Cancer Control Treat,2015,28(1):49-51.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1674-0904.2015.01.011
[10] 李锋坦,李东,张云亭.管电压对CT值测量、辐射剂量及图像质量影响的模型研究[J].中华放射学杂志,2013,47(5):458-461.DOI:10.3760/cma.j.issn.1005-1201.2013.05.016.
Li FT,Li D,Zhang YT.Influence of tube voltage on CT attenuation,radiation dose,and image quality:phantom study[J].Chin J Radiol,2013,47(5):458-461.DOI:10.3760/cma.j.issn.1005-1201.2013.05.016.
[11] Saw CB,Loper A,Komanduri K,et al. Determination of CT-to-density conversion relationship for image-based treatment planning systems[J].Med Dosim,2005,30(3):145-148.DOI:10.1016/j.meddos.2005.05.001.
[12] 莫利明,孙卫星,王清波,等.区域性CT设备QC规范与方法研究[J].中国医学装备,2011,8(12):9-19.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1672-8270.2011.12.003.
Mo LM,Sun WX,Wang QB,et al. Study on specifications and methods for quality control of regional CT devices[J].China Med Equip,2011,8(12):9-19.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1672-8270.2011.12.003.