Abstract Objective To investigate the feasibility of magnetic resonance sialography (MRS) in the evaluation of salivary gland function in patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma treated with intensity-modulated radiotherapy. Methods The MRS images of parotid and submandibular glands were collected in resting and stimulated states among 32 patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma before and after radiotherapy. The visibility of the salivary ducts and radiation-induced xerostomia were evaluated, and the relationship between radiation-induced acute xerostomia grade and MRS score was analyzed. Comparison of the visibility and score between two groups was made by paired t test, and the correlation between acute xerostomia grade and MRS score was determined using the Spearman rank correlation method. Results Both the visibility of salivary duct and MRS score were significantly reduced after radiotherapy (P=0.000,P=0.000). There were significant differences in the variation of MRS scores of the parotid (DPS) and submandibular glands (DSS) from the resting state to the stimulated state between patients with severe and non-severe acute xerostomia (P=0.009;P=0.005). There were no significant differences in MRS scores of the parotid and submandibular glands in resting and stimulated states between patients with severe and non-severe acute xerostomia (P=0.881, P=0.305, P=0.327, P=0.229). The Spearman correlation analysis showed that the acute xerostomia grade was negatively correlated with DPS and DSS (R=－0.472, P=0.006;R=－0.482, P=0.005). Conclusions MRS score is correlated with xerostomia grade. MRS can be used to evaluate the salivary gland function in patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma treated with radiotherapy.
Zhang Yu*,Qu Song,Su Danke et al. Value of magnetic resonance sialography in evaluation of salivary gland function in patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma treated with radiotherapy[J]. Chinese Journal of Radiation Oncology, 2015, 24(5): 544-547.
Zhang Yu*,Qu Song,Su Danke et al. Value of magnetic resonance sialography in evaluation of salivary gland function in patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma treated with radiotherapy[J]. Chinese Journal of Radiation Oncology, 2015, 24(5): 544-547.
[1] Yoshizaki T,Ito M,Murono S,et al. Current understanding and management of nasopharyngeal carcinoma[J].Auris Nasus Larynx,2012,39(2):137-144.DOI:10.1016/j.anl.2011.02.012. [2] Chan AT,Teo PM,Johnson PJ.Nasopharyngeal carcinoma[J].Ann Oncol,2002,13(7):1007-1015.DOI:10.1093/annonc/mdf179. [3] Dirix P,Nuyts S,Van den Bogaert W.Radiation-induced xerostomia in patients with head and neck cancer:a literature review[J].Cancer,2006,107(11):2525-2534.DOI:10.1002/cncr.22302. [4] Lin SJ,Pan JJ,Han L,et al. Nasopharyngeal carcinoma treated with reduced—volume intensity—modulated radiation therapy:report on the 3-year outcome of a prospective series[J].Int J Radiat Oneol Biol Phys,2009,75(4):1071-1078.DOI:10.1016/j.ijrobp.2008.12.015. [5] 陈传本,潘建基,陈荔莎,等.调强放疗条件下鼻咽癌原发肿瘤体积对预后的影响[J].中华放射肿瘤学杂志,2012,21(3):205-208.DOI:10.3760/cma.j.issn.1004-4221.2012.03.004. [6] 高颖川,朱小东,李龄,等.339 例鼻咽癌调强放疗临床疗效分析[J].中国肿瘤临床,2012,39(24):2029-2035.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1000-8179.2012.24.011. [7] 凌春香.磁共振腮腺导管成像技术研究[D].济南:山东大学,2010. [8] Astreinidou E,Raaymakers CPJ,Roesink JM,et al.3D MR sialography protocol for postradiotherapy follow-up of the salivary duct system[J].J Magn Reson Imaging,2006,24(3):556-562.DOI:10.1002/jmri.20659. [9] Wada A,Uchida N,Yokokawa M,et al. Radiation-induced xerostomia:objective evaluation of salivary gland injury using MR sialography[J].Am J Neuroradiol,2009,30(1):53-58.DOI:10.3174/ajnr. A1322. [10] Jha N,Harris J,Seikaly H,et al. A phase Ⅱ study of submandibular gland transfer prior to radiation for prevention of radiation-induced xerostomia in head-and-neck cancer (RTOG 0244)[J].Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys,2012,84(2):437-442.DOI:10.1016/j.ijrobp.2012.02.034. [11] Sreebny LM.Saliva in health and disease:an appraisal and update[J].Int Dent J,2000,50(3):140-161.DOI:10.1111/j.1875-595X.2000.tb00554.x. [12] Ghezzi EM,Lange LA,Ship JA.Determination of variation of stimulated salivary flow rates[J].J Dent Res,2000,79(11):1874-1878.DOI:10.1177/00220345000790111001. [13] Chao KS,Deasy JO,Markman J,et al. A prospective study of salivary function sparing in patients with head-and-neck cancers receiving intensity-modulated or three-dimensional radiation therapy:Initial results[J].Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys,2001,49(4):907-916.DOI:10.1016/S0360-3016(00)01441-3. [14] Morimoto Y,Habu M,Tomoyose T,et al. Dynamic magnetic resonance sialography as a new diagnostic technique for patients with Sjgren′s syndrome[J].Oral Dis,2006,12(4):408-414.DOI:10.1111/j.1601-0825.2005.01215.x. [15] Rzymska-Grala I,Stopa Z,Grala B,et al. Salivary gland calculi-contemporary methods of imaging[J].Pol J Radiol,2010,75(3):25-37. [16] Astreinidou E,Roesink JM,Raaijmakers CPJ,et al.3D MR sialography as a tool to investigate radiation-induced xerostomia:feasibility study[J].Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys,2007,68(5):1310-1319.DOI:10.1016/j.ijrobp.2007.01.062. [17] Ou D,Zhang YY,He XY,et al. Magnetic resonance sialography for investigating major salivary gland duct system after intensity-modulated radiotherapy of nasopharyngeal carcinoma[J].Int J Clin Oncol,2013,18(5):801-807.DOI:10.1007/s10147-012-0464-y. [18] Tanaka T,Ono K,Ansai T,et al. Dynamic magnetic resonance sialography for patients with xerostomia[J].Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod,2008,106(1):115-123.DOI:10.1016/j.tripleo.2008.03.012.
2015, Vol. 24 
