Abstract Objective To study the accuracy of SentinelTM system for patient setup using rigid-body phantom. Methods A 002LFC IMRT phantom was placed on Elekta HexaPODTM 6-degree couch using tattoo and the laser in the treatment room. When a well-know shift (3 directions) and rotation (3 positions) was moved, CBCT and SentinelTM system were scanned respectively, and the measuring errors of six dimensions were recorded. The absolute differences between applied and measured errors were compared and paired t-test. Results Total 15 well-know shifts were investigated. The SentinelTM system was very good stability and the largest absolute difference only 0.9 mm (z direction) and 0.2°(arbitrary direction). At the same time, a good conformance between SentinelTM system and CBCT was displayed because the largest absolute difference between applied and measuring error was less than 0.9 mm (z direction) and 0.2°(arbitrary direction). Conclusions SentinelTM system is fast, simple, non-invasive and seems to be reliable in detecting patient setup errors. It maybe hold potential to ensure precise patient positioning with reduced CBCT frequency in tumor locations with fixed relation to surface structures.
GU Wen-dong,LI Qi-lin,GAO Ming et al. A 002LFC intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) phantom evalution of SentinelTM system for patient set-up verification in radiotherapy[J]. Chinese Journal of Radiation Oncology, 2013, 22(6): 493-496.
GU Wen-dong,LI Qi-lin,GAO Ming et al. A 002LFC intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) phantom evalution of SentinelTM system for patient set-up verification in radiotherapy[J]. Chinese Journal of Radiation Oncology, 2013, 22(6): 493-496.
[1] 徐鹭英,潘建基,王笑良,等.头颈部肿瘤图像引导调强放疗中摆位误差对剂量学的影响研究.中华放射肿瘤学杂志,2011,20:506-509. [2] Stock M, Palm A, Altendorfer A, et al. IGRT induced dose burden for a variety of imaging protocols at two different anatomical sites. Radiother Oncol,2012,102:355-363. [3] Walter C, Boda-Heggemann J, Wertz H, et al. Phantom and in-vivo measurements of dose exposure by image-guided radiotherapy (IGRT):MV portal images vs. kV portal images vs. cone-beam CT. Radiother Oncol,2007,85:418-423. [4] Pallotta S, Marrazzo L, Ceroti M, et al. A phantom evaluation of Sentinel, a commercial laser/camera surface imaging system for patient setup verification in radiotherapy. Med Phys,2012,39:706-712. [5] 李建成,潘建基,胡彩容,等.食管癌锥形束CT配准标志和配准方法探讨.中华放射肿瘤学杂志,2010,19:426-428. [6] Deantonio L, Masini G, Loi G, et al. Detection of setup uncertainties with 3 d surface registration system for conformal radiotherapy of breast cancer. Rep Pract Oncol Radiother,2011,16:77-81. [7] Krengli M, Gaiano S, Mones E, et al. Reproducibility of patient setup by surface image registration system in conformal radiotherapy of prostate cancer. Radiat Oncol,2009,4:9. [8] Stieler F, Wenz F, Lohr F. Laser tracking vs. CBCT for patient positioning (Abstract). Radiother Oncol,2012,103:542.
2013, Vol. 22 
