基于Halcyon和Trilogy固定野调强计划质量和执行效率应用研究

doi:10.3760/cma.j.issn.1004-4221.2019.01.012

Abstract
Figure/Table
References()
Related Citation (15)
Read Tracking
Download Tracking

Download: PDF (0 KB) HTML (1 KB)
Export: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS) Supporting Info

Abstract Objective To compare the dosimetric and delivery efficiency between intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) plans based on Halcyon and Trilogy accelerator. Methods Clinical data of 12 patients with cervical cancer receiving Trilogy platform-based IMRT were retrospectively analyzed. The target area and organ at risk were introduced into the Eclipse version 15.1 TPS. The Halcyon-based IMRT was re-designed. The dose coverage of target area and organs at risk, monitor unit (MU) efficiency, delivery time and segment area and the differences between the proximal and distal segment area were statistically compared between two IMRT plans. Results The Halcyon treatment platform could meet the clinical objectives. Dose distribution of the target area was similar to that of the Trilogy plan (P>0.05). The volumes in the bladder and rectum receiving 30 Gy and the volumes in the left femoral head receiving 20 Gy of Halcyon plan and the mean dose (Dmean) of bladder, rectum and left femoral head were significantly lower compared with those of the Trilogy plan (P=0.001-0.043).The MUs of the Halcyon plan was 2 316.7±209.7, significantly higher than 1 692.5±259.5 of the Trilogy plan (P=0.000). The delivery time significantly differed between the Halcyon[(3.01±0.28) min] and Trilogy[(12.38±1.49) min](P=0.000).The average segment area of Halcyon plan for proximal and distal MLC was (43.7±32.5) cm² and (28.8±25.4) cm², the average segment area of Trilogy plan was (25.7±16.8) cm², the ratio of the proximal and distal segment area was 1.73±0.43, ranging from 0.71 to 6.28. Conclusions Halcyon treatment platform can meet the clinical requirements and reduce the dosage coverage of normal tissues with better delivery efficiency. The ratio of proximal and distal segment areas should be considered during the plan design.

	Service

	E-mail this article
	Add to my bookshelf
	Add to citation manager
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	Articles by authors
	Li Chengqiang
	Chen Jinhu
	Li Zhenjiang
	Lu Jie
	Tao Cheng
	Zhu Jian
	Yin Yong

Key words： Intensity-modulated radiation therapy Flatten filter free Dual layer MLC Segment area

Received: 07 August 2017

Fund:Natural Science Foundation of China (81472811,81671785); Natural Key Research and Develop Program of China (2016YFC0105106); Key Research and Develop Program of Shandong Province(2018GSF118006);Natural Science Foundation of Shandong Province(ZR2016HQ09)

Corresponding Authors: Yin Yong,Email:yongyinsd@163.com

Cite this article:

Li Chengqiang,Chen Jinhu,Li Zhenjiang et al. he dosimetric and delivery efficiency between Halcyon-and Trilogy-based IMRT plans[J]. Chinese Journal of Radiation Oncology, 2019, 28(1): 57-60.

URL:

http://journal12.magtechjournal.com/Jweb_fszlx/EN/10.3760/cma.j.issn.1004-4221.2019.01.012 OR http://journal12.magtechjournal.com/Jweb_fszlx/EN/Y2019/V28/I1/57

[1] Otto K.Volumetric modulated arc therapy:IMRT in a single gantry arc[J].Med Phys,2008,35(1):310-317.DOI:10.1118/1.2818738.
[2] Bedford JL.Treatment planning for volumetric modulated arc therapy. Med Phys,2009,36(11):5128–5138.DOI:10.1118/1.3240488.
[3] Lu SH,Cheng JCH,Kuo SH,et al. Volumetric modulated arc therapy for nasopharyngeal carcinoma:a dosimetric comparison with TomoTherapy and step-and-shoot IMRT[J].Radiother Oncol,2012,104(3):324-330.DOI:10.1016/j.radonc.2011.11.017.
[4] Pönisch F,Titt U,Vassiliev ON,et al. Properties of unflattened photon beams shaped by a multileaf collimator[J].Med Phys,2006,33(6):1738-1746.DOI:10.1118/1.2201149.
[5] Nguyen D,Rwigema JCM,Victoria YY,et al. Feasibility of extreme dose escalation for glioblastoma multiforme using 4π radiotherapy[J].Radiat Oncol,2014,9(2):239-247.DOI:10.1186/s13014-014-0239-x.
[6] Tran A,Zhang J,Woods K,et al. Treatment planning comparison of IMPT,VMAT and 4π radiotherapy for prostate cases[J].Radiat Oncol,2017,12(1):10-19.DOI:10.1186/s13014-016-0761-0.
[7] Vassiliev ON,Titt U,Pönisch F,et al. Dosimetric properties of photon beams from a flattening filter free clinical accelerator[J].Phys Med Biol,2006,51(7):1907-1917.DOI:10.1088/0031-9155/51/7/ 019.
[8] Dzierma Y,Licht N,Nuesken F,et al. Beam properties and stability of a flattening-filter free 7 MV beam—An overview[J].Med Phys,2012,39(5):2595-2602.DOI:10.1118/1.3703835.
[9] Georg D,Knöös T,McClean B.Current status and future perspective of flattening filter free photon beams[J].Med Phys,2011,38(3):1280-1293.DOI:10.1118/1.3554643.
[10] Xiao Y,Kry SF,Popple R,et al. Flattening filter-free accelerators:a report from the AAPM Therapy Emerging Technology Assessment Work Group[J].J Appl Clin Med Phys,2015,16(3):12-29.DOI:10.1120/jacmp.v16i3.5219.
[11] Joy S,Starkschall G,Kry S,et al. Dosimetric effects of jaw tracking in step-and-shoot intensity modulated radiation therapy[J].J Appl Clin Med Phys,2012,13(2):136-145.DOI:10.1120/jacmp.v13i2.3707.
[12] Kim J,Park J M,Park SY,et al. Assessment of potential jaw-tracking advantage using control point sequences of VMAT planning[J].J Appl Clin Med Phys,2014,15(2):160-168.DOI:10.1120/jacmp.v15i2.4625.
[13] 李光俊,李衍龙,肖江洪,等.VMAT 加速器日常运行分析及过程质量控制[J].中华放射肿瘤学杂志,2015,24(2):200-203.DOI:10.3760/cma.j.issn.1004-4221.2015.02.023.
Li GJ,LI YL,Xiao JH,et al. Quality control of linac in daily volumetric-modulated arc therapy[J].Chin J Radiat Oncol,2015,24(2):200-203.DOI:10.3760/cma.j.issn.1004-4221.2015.02.023.
[14] 崔伟杰,戴建荣.用于双层多叶准直器的指形叶片设计[J].中华放射医学与防护杂志,2010,30(1):29-32.DOI:10.3760/cma.j.issn.0254-5098.2010.01.008.
Cui WJ,Dai JR.A finger leaf design for dual layer MLCs[J].Chin J Radiol Med Prot,2010,30(1):29-32.DOI:10.3760/cma.j.issn.0254-5098.2010.01.008.