[an error occurred while processing this directive] | [an error occurred while processing this directive]
Evaluation of technical performance of stereotactic radiosurgery algorithm in optical surface imaging system in non-coplanar radiotherapy
Liu Shoupeng1,2, Chen Hongjia3, Lai Jialu2, Mao Erbu2, Zhou Ji2, Huang Yang2, Liu Denghong2, Zhong Renming2
1Department of Oncology, Fifth People's Hospital of Chengdu, Chengdu 611130, China; 2Radiotherapy Physics & Technology Center, Cancer Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, China; 3Qilu Medical University, Zibo 255300, China
AbstractObjective To evaluate the accuracy and stability of stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) algorithm in optical surface imaging (OSI) system in non-coplanar radiotherapy. Methods Three OSI imaging systems were used to measure the phantom repeatedly at different couch rotation angles to analyze the accuracy and stability of OSI system. Seven patients with multiple brain metastases who underwent single-center non-coplanar radiotherapy were randomly selected, and the accuracy and stability of OSI for patient imaging were analyzed. Stability is defined as the difference between the two OSI measurements when the couch is turned from 0° to a non 0° angle, and then back to 0°, using the 0° cone beam CT (CBCT) as the "gold standard". Accuracy is defined as the difference between OSI and CBCT (at 0° couch angle) measurement data. The measurement data with normal distribution were described as Mean ± SD. The data with non-normal distribution were expressed as M (Q). The difference of the former data was compared by one-way ANOVA, and the difference of the latter data was assessed by Kruskal-Wallis H nonparametric test. Results For non-coplanarity, the translation accuracy of the phantom and the patient was ≤ 1.30 mm and ≤ 1.00 mm, and the rotation accuracy was ≤ 0.50° and ≤ 0.60°, respectively. The translation errors mainly occurred in the left-right and head-foot directions. In terms of stability, the maximum standard deviation of phantom coplanar translation and rotation was 0.06 mm and 0.06°. The maximum standard deviation of patient translation and rotation was 0.17 mm and 0.19°. Conclusions Although the new SRS algorithm improves the non-coplanar accuracy, it still cannot meet the precise requirements of non-coplanar single isocenter radiotherapy for multiple brain metastases, especially in the left-right and head-foot directions. When the couch rotation angle is large, OSI is not recommended for image-guided radiotherapy. However, its high stability can be used to monitor the intrafractional motion of patients.
Fund:Science and Technology Department of Sichuan Province (2021YFQ0065); Clinical Research Incubation Project of West China Hospital, Sichuan University (2021HXFH029)
Liu Shoupeng,Chen Hongjia,Lai Jialu et al. Evaluation of technical performance of stereotactic radiosurgery algorithm in optical surface imaging system in non-coplanar radiotherapy[J]. Chinese Journal of Radiation Oncology, 2023, 32(5): 438-444.
Liu Shoupeng,Chen Hongjia,Lai Jialu et al. Evaluation of technical performance of stereotactic radiosurgery algorithm in optical surface imaging system in non-coplanar radiotherapy[J]. Chinese Journal of Radiation Oncology, 2023, 32(5): 438-444.
[1] Nicosia L, Figlia V, Mazzola R, et al.Repeated stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) using a non-coplanar mono-isocenter (HyperArc™) technique versus upfront whole-brain radiotherapy (WBRT): a matched-pair analysis[J]. Clin Exp Metastasis, 2020,37(1):77-83. DOI: 10.1007/s10585-019-10004-3.
[2] Calmels L, Blak Nyrup Biancardo S, Sibolt P, et al. Single-isocenter stereotactic non-coplanar arc treatment of 200 patients with brain metastases: multileaf collimator size and setup uncertainties[J]. 2022,198(5):436-447.
[3] Yock AD, Pawlicki T, Kim GY.Prospective treatment plan-specific action limits for real-time intrafractional monitoring in surface image guided radiosurgery[J]. Med Phys, 2016,43(7):4342. DOI: 10.1118/1.4953192.
[4] Al-Hallaq HA, Cerviño L, Gutierrez AN, et al.AAPM task group report 302: surface-guided radiotherapy[J]. Med Phys, 2022,49(4):e82-e112. DOI: 10.1002/mp.15532.
[5] 李谭谭, 郇福奎, 戴建荣. 光学体表引导放疗技术的临床应用[J].中华放射肿瘤学杂志,2021,30(6):648-652. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn113030-20200630-00330.
Li TT, Huan FK, Dai JR.Clinical application of surface guided radiotherapy[J].Chin J Radiat Oncol,2021,30(6):648-652. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn113030-20200630-00330.
[6] Paolani G, Strolin S, Santoro M, et al.A novel tool for assessing the correlation of internal/external markers during SGRT guided stereotactic ablative radiotherapy treatments[J]. Phys Med, 2021,92:40-51. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejmp.2021.10.021.
[7] Freislederer P, Kügele M, Öllers M, et al.Recent advanced in surface guided radiation therapy[J]. Radiat Oncol, 2020,15(1):187. DOI: 10.1186/s13014-020-01629-w.
[8] Kojima H, Takemura A, Kurokawa S, et al.Evaluation of technical performance of optical surface imaging system using conventional and novel stereotactic radiosurgery algorithms[J]. J Appl Clin Med Phys, 2021,22(2):58-68. DOI: 10.1002/acm2.13152.
[9] Klein EE, Hanley J, Bayouth J, et al.Task group 142 report: quality assurance of medical accelerators[J]. Med Phys, 2009,36(9):4197-4212. DOI: 10.1118/1.3190392.
[10] Nutti B, Kronander Å, Nilsing M,et al. Depth sensor-based real time tumor tracking for accurate radiation therapy[EB/OL]. (2014-06-01)[2022-04-20]. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/295830267_Depth_sensor-based_real_time_tumor_tracking_for_accurate_radiation_therapy.
[11] Kadman B, Takemura A, Ito T, et al.Accuracy of patient setup positioning using surface-guided radiotherapy with deformable registration in cases of surface deformation[J]. J Appl Clin Med Phys, 2022,23(3):e13493. DOI: 10.1002/acm2.13493.
[12] Lee SK, Huang S, Zhang L, et al.Accuracy of surface-guided patient setup for conventional radiotherapy of brain and nasopharynx cancer[J]. J Appl Clin Med Phys, 2021,22(5):48-57. DOI: 10.1002/acm2.13241.
[13] Kügele M, Mannerberg A, Nørring Bekke S, et al.Surface guided radiotherapy (SGRT) improves breast cancer patient setup accuracy[J]. J Appl Clin Med Phys, 2019,20(9):61-68. DOI: 10.1002/acm2.12700.
[14] Mannerberg A, Kügele M, Hamid S, et al.Faster and more accurate patient positioning with surface guided radiotherapy for ultra-hypofractionated prostate cancer patients[J]. Tech Innov Patient Support Radiat Oncol, 2021,19:41-45. DOI: 10.1016/j.tipsro.2021.07.001.
[15] Zhang L, Vijayan S, Huang S, et al.Commissioning of optical surface imaging systems for cranial frameless stereotactic radiosurgery[J]. J Appl Clin Med Phys, 2021,22(5):182-190. DOI: 10.1002/acm2.13240.
[16] Li G, Ballangrud A, Kuo LC, et al.Motion monitoring for cranial frameless stereotactic radiosurgery using video-based three-dimensional optical surface imaging[J]. Med Phys, 2011,38(7):3981-3994. DOI: 10.1118/1.3596526.
[17] Covington EL, Fiveash JB, Wu X, et al.Optical surface guidance for submillimeter monitoring of patient position during frameless stereotactic radiotherapy[J]. J Appl Clin Med Phys, 2019,20(6):91-98. DOI: 10.1002/acm2.12611.
[18] Swinnen A, Öllers MC, Loon Ong C, et al.The potential of an optical surface tracking system in non-coplanar single isocenter treatments of multiple brain metastases[J]. J Appl Clin Med Phys, 2020,21(6):63-72. DOI: 10.1002/acm2.12866.
[19] C-RAD. Catalyst HD/C-RAD[EB/OL]. (2020-05-01)[2022-04-20].https://c-rad.se/catalyst-hd/.
[20] Badakhshi H, Barelkowski T, Wust P, et al.Intrafraction variations in linac-based image-guided radiosurgery of intracranial lesions[J]. Cancer Radiother, 2013,17(7):664-667. DOI: 10.1016/j.canrad.2013.05.011.
[21] Sarkar V, Paxton A, Szegedi MW, et al.An evaluation of the consistency of shifts reported by three different systems for non-coplanar treatments[J]. J Radiosurg SBRT, 2018,5(4):323-330.
2023, Vol. 32 
