机器性能检查系统在加速器的应用评估

doi:10.3760/cma.j.cn113030-20201021-00506

Abstract
Figure/Table
References()
Related Citation (4)
Read Tracking
Download Tracking

Download: PDF (0 KB) HTML (1 KB)
Export: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS) Supporting Info

Abstract Objective To verify the reliability, accuracy and stability of the machine performance check (MPC) system of Varian's TrueBeam series accelerator.Methods After the installation was completed, the acceptance data were compared with the results of the first MPC operation to verify the reliability of the MPC results;the accuracy of the MPC results in the image-guided radiotherapy (IGRT) application was verified by the method of artificially introducing errors. The mechanical performance results of 60 groups of MPC from March 2019 to March 2020 were collected to calculate the mean value and standard deviation and compare the stability differences of each index. Results The equipment error parameters obtained by MPC were all lower than those obtained by acceptance. The maximum difference between two sets of data was only 2mm and the threshold ratio was less than 20%. MPC had a high sensing accuracy for radiation and imaging position shift, and the r values were more than 90%. The vertical direction of the couch had a poor sense of displacement accuracy, and the r value was less than 73.7%. For this verification project, the angle of the treatment bed was the most stable, and the standard deviation did not exceed 0.01. The stability of other indexes did not significantly differ. Conclusions MPC can be used as a verification tool for routine quality assurance of IGRT. The verification accuracy of radiation and imaging centers are better than the mechanical accuracy of gantry, collimator and couch.

	Service

	E-mail this article
	Add to my bookshelf
	Add to citation manager
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	Articles by authors
	Xiao Yang
	Huang Shunping
	Li Heng
	Wu Yan
	Zhang Yaqian
	Chen Xingqiang

Key words： Machine performance check Reliability Accuracy Stability

Received: 21 October 2020

Corresponding Authors: Huang Shunping, Email:512598780@qq.com

Cite this article:

Xiao Yang,Huang Shunping,Li Heng et al. Evaluation of machine performance check (MPC) system in accelerator[J]. Chinese Journal of Radiation Oncology, 2021, 30(6): 598-601.

URL:

http://journal12.magtechjournal.com/Jweb_fszlx/EN/10.3760/cma.j.cn113030-20201021-00506 OR http://journal12.magtechjournal.com/Jweb_fszlx/EN/Y2021/V30/I6/598

[1] Bissonnette JP, Balter PA, Dong L, et al. Quality assurance for image-guided radiation therapy utilizing CT-based technologies:a report of the AAPM TG-179[J]. Med Phys, 2012, 39(4):1946-1963.DOI:10.1118/1.3690466.
[2] Barnes MP, Greer PB. Evaluation of the truebeam machine performance check (MPC) geometric checks for daily IGRT geometric accuracy quality assurance[M]. New Jersey:John Wiley & Sons, Ltd, 2017.DOI:10.1002/arcm2.12064.
[3] Lutz W, Winston K, Maleki N. A system for stereotactic radio-sur-gery with a linear accelerator[J]. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys, 1988, 14:373-381.DOI:10.1016/0360-3016(88)90446-4.
[4] Clivio A, Vanetti E, Rose S, et al. Evaluation of the machine perfor-mance check application for TrueBeam Linac[J]. Radiat Oncol, 2015, 10:97.DOI:10.1186/s13014-015-0381-0.
[5] Barnes MP, Greer PB. Evaluation of the TrueBeam machine perfor-mance check (MPC) beam constancy checks for flattened and flat-tening filter-free (FFF) photon beams[J]. J Appl Clin Med Phys, 2017, 18(1):139-150.DOI:10.1002/arcm2.12016.
[6] GB/T 19046-2013, 医用电子加速器验收试验和周期检验规程[S].
GB/T 19046-2013, Acceptance test and periodic inspection procedures for medical electron accelerators[S].
[7] Varian Medical Systems. TrueBeam/TrueBeam STx software version2.0.x. installation product acceptance. IPA-HT-20-D[M]. Palo Alto:Varian Associ-ates Inc. Oncology Systems, 2014.
[8] Bissonnette JP, Moseley D, White E, et al. Quality assurance for the geometric accuracy of cone-beam CT guidance in radiation therapy[J]. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys, 2008, 71(1 suppl):S57-61.DOI:10.1016/j.ijrobp.2007.06.086.
[9] 戴建荣,胡逸民. 图像引导放疗的实现方式[J]. 中华放射肿瘤学杂志,2006, 15(2):132-135. DOI:10.3760/j.issn:1004-4221.2006.02.019.
Dai JR, Hu YM. Realization of image-guided radiotherapy[J]. Chin J Radiat Oncol, 2006,15(2):132-135. DOI:10.3760/j.issn:1004-4221.2006.02.019.
[10] 胡金炎,裴运通,马阳光,等. 加速器机载影像系统图像质量量化评价及质量保证阈值设定研究[J]. 中华放射肿瘤学杂志,2019, 28(12):919-923.DOI:10.3760/cma.j.issn.1004-4221.2019.12.009.
Hu JY, Pei YT, Ma YG, et al. A quantitative evaluation on the image-quality parameters and quality assurance thresholds setting of accelerator on-board imaging system[J]. Chin J Radiat Oncol, 2019, 28(12):919-923.DOI:10.3760/cma.j.issn.1004-4221.2019.12.009.
[11] 庄永东,王彬,朱金汉,等. 医用直线加速器机载影像系统QC图像定量评估方法研究[J]. 中华放射肿瘤学杂志, 2017, 26(4):442-447.DOI:10.3760/cma.j.issn.1004-4221.2017.04.016.
Zhuang YD, Wang B, Zhu JH, et al. A quantitative evaluation of quality control image for on-board imaging system of medical linear accelerator[J]. Chin J Radiat Oncol, 2017, 26(4):442-447.DOI:10.3760/cma.j.issn.1004-4221.2017.04.016.
[12] 胡金炎,张丽媛,刘乐乐,等. 基于EPID采用参数化梯度法测定光子束射野边界[J]. 中国医学物理学杂志,2018, 35(11):1261-1268. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2018.011.005.
Hu JY, Zhang LY, Liu LL, et al. EPID-based parameterized gradient method for photon beam field size determination[J]. Chin J Med Phys, 2018, 35(11):1261-1268. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2018.011.005.