[an error occurred while processing this directive]|[an error occurred while processing this directive]
Siemens Artiste加速器4种图像引导方式的放射剂量学研究
庞廷田, 杨波, 刘峡, 刘楠, 董婷婷, 邱杰
100730 北京,中国医学科学院北京协和医学院北京协和医院放疗科
Dosimetric study of four image mode-guided radiotherapy with Siemens Artiste Linac
Pang Tingtian, Yang Bo, Liu Xia, Liu Nan, Dong Tingting, Qiu Jie
Department of Radiation Oncology,Peking Union Medical College Hospital,Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences,Peking Union Medical College,Beijing 100730,China
Abstract： Objective To measure the irradiation doses from the image beam line (IBL) of Artiste linac under the 2Dplanar,MV CBCT,6 MV 2Dplanar and Somatom CT modes to select an appropriate image-guided mode combined with the irradiation sites. Methods The head, chest and pelvic phantom doses from the IBL under the 2Dplanar,MV CBCT and 6 MV 2Dplanar modes were measured by using IBA Dose 1 electrometer and FC65 ionization chamber. The irradiation doses of Somatom CT scans of the head, chest and pelvis were measured using IBA Dosimax plus A system and the measurement results were analyzed. Results In the head and neck, the average irradiation dose was 16.60 mGy under IBL 2Dplanar mode, 58.73 mGy under IBL MV CBCT mode, 19.83 mGy under 6 MV 2Dplanar mode and 7-9 mGy under Somatom CT. In the chest, the average irradiation dose was 14.08 mGy under IBL 2Dplanar mode, 49.17 mGy under MV CBCT mode, 18.97 mGy under 6 MV 2Dplanar mode and 9-11 mGy under Somatom CT mode. In the pelvis, the average irradiation dose was 13.36 mGy under IBL 2Dplanar mode, 45.65 mGy under MV CBCT mode, 17.52 mGy under 6 MV 2Dplanar mode and 12-15 mGy under Somatom CT mode. Conclusions In the head and neck, the image quality under IBL 2Dplanar mode is recommended, which is qualified for image registration standards. Somatom CT mode is suitable for the chest. In the pelvic region, IBL 2DPlanar mode can be applied when the intestinal cavity and bladder are well filled, and MV CBCT mode can be chosen if they are poorly filled.
Pang Tingtian,Yang Bo,Liu Xia et al. Dosimetric study of four image mode-guided radiotherapy with Siemens Artiste Linac[J]. Chinese Journal of Radiation Oncology, 2018, 27(7): 685-689.
[1] Kamath S,Song W,Chvetsov A,et al. An image quality comparison study between XVI and OBI CBCT systems[J].J Appl Clin Med Phys,2011,12:3435.E-ISSN:1526-9914;PMID:21587192. [2] Perks JR,Lehmann J,Chen AM,et al. Comparison of peripheral dose from image-guided radiation therapy (IGRT) using kV cone beam CT to intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT)[J].Radiother Oncol,2008,89:304e10.DOI:10.1016/j.radonc.2008.07.026. [3] Broggi S,Perna L,Bonsignore F,et al. Static and rotational intensity modulated techniques for head-neck cancer radiotherapy:a planning comparison[J].Phys Medica, 2014,30:973e9.DOI:10.1016/j.ejmp.2014.07.001. [4] Cheng HC,Wu VW,Liu ES,Kwong DL.Evaluation of radiation dose and image quality for the Varian cone beam computed tomography system[J].Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys,2010,80:291e300.ISSN:0360-3016. [5] Hyer DE,Serago CF,Kim S,et al. An organ and effective dose study of XVI and OBI cone-beam CT systems[J].J Appl Clin Med Phys,2010,11:3183.E-ISSN:15269914. [6] Kan MW,Leung LH,Wong W,Lam N.Radiation dose from cone beam computed tomography for image-guided radiation therapy[J].Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys,2008,70:272e9.DOI:10.1016/j.ijrobp.2007.08.062. [7] Osei EK,Schaly B,Fleck A,et al. Dose assessment from an online kilovoltage imaging system in radiation therapy[J].J Radiol Pro,2009,29:37e50.DOI:10.1088/0952-4746/29/1/002. [8] Bissonnette JP,Balter PA,Dong L,et al. Quality assurance for image-guided radiation therapy utilizing CT-based technologies:a report of the AAPM TG-179[J].Med Phys, 2012,39:1946e63.DOI:10.1118/1.3690466. [9] Ding GX,Munro P,Pawlowski J,et al. Reducing radiation exposure to patients from kV-CBCT imaging[J].Radiother Oncol, 2010,97:585e92.DOI:10.1016/j.radonc.2010.08.005. [10] Hyer DE,Hintenlang DE.Estimation of organ doses from kilovoltage cone-beam CT imaging used during radiotherapy patient position verification[J].Med Phys,2010,37:4620e6.DOI:10.1118/1.3476459. [11] Kim S,Yoo S,Yin FF,Samei E,et al. Kilovoltage cone-beam CT:comparative dose and image quality evaluations in partial and full-angle scan protocols[J].Med Phys,2010,37:3648e59.DOI:10.1118/1.3438478. [12] Kourinou KM,Mazonakis M,Lyraraki E,et al. Scattered dose to radiosensitive organs and associated risk for cancer development from head and neck radiotherapy in pediatric patients[J].Phys Medica,2013,29:650e5.DOI:10.1016/j.ejmp.2012.08.001. [13] Barateau A,Garlopeau C,Cugny A,et al. Dose calculation accuracy of different image value to density tables for cone-beam CT planning in head& neck and pelvic localizations[J].Phys Medica,2015,31:146e51.DOI:10.1016/j.ejmp.2014.12.007 [14] Alaei P,Ding G,Guan H.Inclusion of the dose from kilovoltage cone beam CT in the radiation therapy treatment plans[J].Med Phys,2010,37:244e8.DOI:10.1118/1.3271582. [15] Yan H,Cervino L,Jia X,Jiang SB.A comprehensive study on the relationship between the image quality and imaging dose in low-dose cone beam CT[J]. Phys Med Biol,2012,57:2063e80.DOI:10.1088/0031-9155/57/7/2063. [16] Islam MK,Purdie TG,Norrlinger BD,et al. Patient dose from kilovoltage cone beam computed tomography imaging in radiation therapy[J].Med Phys,2006,33:1573e82. DOI:10.1118/1.2198169. [17] Amer A,Marchant T,Sykes J,et al. Imaging doses from the elekta synergy X-ray cone beam CT system[J].Br J Radiology, 2007,80:476e82.DOI:10.1259/bjr/80446730. [18] Wen N,Guan H,Hammoud R,et al. Dose delivered from Varian′s CBCT to patients receiving IMRT for prostate cancer[J].Phys Med Biol, 2007,52:2267e76.DOI:10.1088/0031-9155/52/8/015 [19] Walter C,Boda-Heggemann J,Wertz H,et al. Phantomand in-vivo measurements of dose exposure by image-guided radiotherapy (IGRT):MV portal images vs.kV portal images vs.cone-beam CT[J].Radiother Oncol,2007,85:418e23.DOI:10.1016/j.radonc.2007.10.014. [20] Jeng SC,Tsai CL,Chan WT,et al. Mathematical esti-mation and in vivo dose measurement for cone-beam computed tomogra-phy on prostate cancer patients[J].Radiother Oncol, 2009,92:57e61.DOI:10.1016/j.radonc.2009.03.010. [21] Ding GX,Coffey CW.Beam characteristics and radiation output of a kilo-voltage cone-beam CT[J].Phys Med Biol, 2010,55:5231e48.DOI:10.1088/0031-9155/55/17/022. [22] Ding GX,Duggan DM,Coffey CW.Accurate patient dosimetry of kilovoltage cone-beam CT in radiation therapy[J].Med Phys, 2008,35:1135e44.DOI:10.1118/1.2839096. [23] Spezi E,Downes P,Radu E,et al. Monte Carlo simulation of an x-ray volume imaging cone beam CT unit[J].Med Phys, 2009,36:127e36.DOI:10.1118/1.3031113; [24] Downes P,Jarvis R,Radu E,et al. Monte Carlo simulation and patient dosimetry for a kilovoltage cone-beam CT unit[J].Med Phys,2009,36:4156e67.DOI:10.1118/1.3196182. [25] Perks JR,Lehmann J,Chen AM,et al. Comparison of peripheral dose from image-guided radiation therapy (IGRT) using kV cone beam CT to intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT)[J].Radiother Oncol,2008,89:304e10.DOI:10.1016/j.radonc.2008.07.026. [26] Jia MX,Zhang X,Li N,et al. Peripheral dosefrommegavoltage cone-beam CT imaging for nasopharyngeal carcinoma image-guided radiation therapy[J].J Appl Clin Med Phys, 2012,13:3e11.E-ISSN:15269914. [27] Ding GX,Coffey CW.Radiation dose from kilovoltage cone beam computed tomography in an image-guided radiotherapy procedure[J].Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys, 2009,73:610e7.DOI:10.1016/j.ijrobp.2008.10.006. [28] Zhang Y,Yan Y,Nath R,et al. Personalized assessment of kV cone beam computed tomography doses in image-guided radiotherapy of pediatric cancer patients[J].Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys, 2012,83:1649e54.DOI:10.1016/j.ijrobp.2011.10.072. [29] Deng J,Chen Z,Roberts KB,Nath R.Kilovoltage imaging doses in the radio-therapy of pediatric cancer patients[J].Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys, 2012,82:1680e8.DOI:10.1016/J.IJROBP.2011.01.062. [30] Faddegon B,Wu V,Pouliot J,et al. Low dose megavoltage cone beam computed tomography with an unflattened 4 MV beam from a carbon target[J].Med Phys,2008,35(12):5777–86.DOI:10.1118/1.3013571.
2018, Vol. 27 
