三种放疗技术对早期鼻咽癌颈部皮肤设定限制剂量差异研究

doi:10.3760/cma.j.issn.1004-4221.2018.02.016

摘要
图/表
参考文献()
相关文章 (7)
点击分布统计
下载分布统计

全文: PDF (0 KB) HTML (1 KB)
输出: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS) 背景资料

摘要目的比较固定野dIMRT、VMAT和HT技术在早期鼻咽癌放疗过程中颈部皮肤受量情况。方法选取 16例完成放疗的早期鼻咽癌病例,将颈部外轮廓内缩3 mm生成皮肤。分别以传统方式(TP组)和将颈部皮肤作为OAR (NP组)进行剂量限制设计计划。统计各组计划中颈部皮肤 Dmean、V5—V70。对同一放疗技术的两组计划行配对t检验;对3种放疗技术的同一处理方法三组行方差分析。结果 HT组皮肤 Dmean、V5、V10、V30—V70均高于dIMRT和VMAT组(P=0.00、0.00、0.00、0.00、0.00、0.00、0.00、0.02)。dIMRT技术NP组皮肤 Dmean、V10—V60较TP组分别降低7%、8%、22%、25%、38%、59%、85%(P=0.00、0.00、0.00、0.00、0.00、0.00、0.00);VMAT技术NP组皮肤 Dmean、V20—V40较TP组分别降低4%、19%、29%、34%(P=0.02、0.01、0.02、0.01);HT技术NP组皮肤V30—V70较TP组分别降低20%、29%、50%、67%、100%(P=0.00、0.00、0.00、0.00、0.03)。结论早期鼻咽癌放疗计划设计中HT较dIMRT和VMAT引起的颈部皮肤受量高,dIMRT和VMAT结果近似;在进行早期鼻咽癌计划设计时将颈部皮肤作为OAR进行剂量限制可明显降低颈部皮肤受量。

	服务

	把本文推荐给朋友
	加入我的书架
	加入引用管理器
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	作者相关文章
	张玉雷
	廖雄飞
	黎杰
	白立新
	徐鹏
	李厨荣
	陈亚正
	王培

关键词 ：鼻咽肿瘤/固定野动态调强放射疗法, 鼻咽肿瘤/容积调强弧形疗法, 鼻咽肿瘤/螺旋断层疗法, 皮肤剂量

Abstract：Objective To compare the neck skin dose between fixed-field dynamic intensity-modulated radiation therapy (dIMRT), volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT), and helical tomotherapy (HT) in the treatment of early-stage nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Methods A total of 16 early-stage nasopharyngeal carcinoma patients undergoing radiotherapy were enrolled as subjects. The neck skin was delineated by contraction of the outer edge of neck by 3 mm. Dose planning was made by the traditional method (TP group) and a new method (NP group), in which the neck skin was considered as the organ at risk. Dmean and V5-V70 for the neck skin were recorded. The paired t-test was used to analyze the differences between two plans in each radiotherapy method. An analysis of variance was used to compare the same plan between the three radiotherapy Methods. Results The HT group had significantly higher Dmean and V5-V70 for the neck skin than the dIMRT group and the VMAT group (P=0.00,0.00,0.00,0.00,0.00,0.00,0.00,0.02). Using dIMRT, the Dmean and V10-V60 for the neck skin were reduced by 7%, 8%, 22%, 25%, 38%, 59%, and 85% in the NP group than in the TP group (P=0.00,0.00,0.00,0.00,0.00,0.00,0.00). Using VMAT, the Dmean and V20-V40 for the neck skin were reduced by 4%, 19%, 29%, and 34% in the NP group than in the TP group (P=0.02,0.01,0.02,0.01). Using HT, the V30-V60 for the neck skin were reduced by 20%, 29%, 50%, and 67% in the NP group than in the TP group (P=0.00,0.00,0.00,0.00,0.03). Conclusions In the treatment of early-stage nasopharyngeal carcinoma, HT causes a higher radiation dose to the neck skin than dIMRT and VMAT, while dIMRT and VMAT have similar neck skin doses. The neck skin dose can be significantly reduced with the neck skin as the organ at risk.

Key words： Nasopharyngeal neoplasms/dynamic intensity-modulated radiation therapy Nasopharyngeal neoplasms/volumetric modulated arc therapy Nasopharyngeal neoplasms/helical tomotherapy Skin dose

收稿日期: 2017-08-16

通讯作者: 廖雄飞,Email:fybre@163.com

引用本文:

张玉雷,廖雄飞,黎杰等. 三种放疗技术对早期鼻咽癌颈部皮肤设定限制剂量差异研究[J]. 中华放射肿瘤学杂志, 2018, 27(2): 199-203.

Zhang Yulei,Liao Xiongfei,Li Jie et al. Neck skin dose planning for early-stage nasopharyngeal carcinoma:a comparative study of three radiotherapy methods[J]. Chinese Journal of Radiation Oncology, 2018, 27(2): 199-203.

链接本文:

http://journal12.magtechjournal.com/Jweb_fszlx/CN/10.3760/cma.j.issn.1004-4221.2018.02.016 或 http://journal12.magtechjournal.com/Jweb_fszlx/CN/Y2018/V27/I2/199

[1] 石锦平,张利文,谭以昶,等.不同射野角度的鼻咽癌调强放疗计划的比较研究[J].中国癌症防治杂志,2013,5(2):134-138.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1674-5671.2013.02.12.Shi JP,Zhang LW,Tan YC,et al. Comparison of different beam arrangements in intensity-modulated radiation therapy to treat nasopharyngeal carcinoma[J].Chin J Oncol Prev Treat,2013,5(2):134-138.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1674-5671.2013.02.12.
[2] 张矛,金海国,杨金磊,等.容积旋转调强与固定野调强计划在鼻咽癌放疗中的剂量学比较[J].中华放射医学与防护杂志,2014,34(11):852-854.DOI:10.3760/cma.j.issn.0254-5098.2014.11.013.Zhang M,Jin HG,Yang JL,et al. Dosimetry comparison of volume rotation intensity and fixed field intensity planning in radiotherapy for nasopharyngeal carcinoma[J].Chin J Radiol Med Protect,2014,34(11):852-854.DOI:10.3760/cma.j.issn.0254-5098.2014.11.013.
[3] 杭霞瑜,刘海,李益坤,等.鼻咽癌螺旋断层放疗与常规调强放疗的剂量学分析[J].中国医疗设备,2013,28(12):15-18.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1674-1633.2013.12.006.Hang XY,Liu H,Li YK,et al. A dosimetric analysis between helical tomotherapy and conventional IMRT for nasopharyngeal carcinoma[J].China Med Devices,2013,28(12):15-18.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1674-1633.2013.12.006.
[4] Lee FKH,Yip CWY,Cheung FCH,et al. Dosimetric difference amongst 3 techniques:TomoTherapy,sliding-window intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT),and RapidArc radiotherapy in the treatment of late-stage nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC)[J].Medi Dosim,2014,39(1):44-49.DOI:10.1016/j.meddos.2013.09.004.
[5] Ramsey CR,Seibert RM,Robison B,et al. Helical tomotherapy superficial dose measurements[J].Med Phys,2007,34(8):3286-3293.DOI:10.1118/1.2757000.
[6] Cheek D,Gibbons JP,Rosen Ⅱ,et al. Accuracy of TomoTherapy treatments for superficial target volumes[J].Med Phys,2008,35(8):3565-3573.DOI:10.1118/1.2952362.
[7] Shiaua AC,Lai PL,Liang JA,et al. Dosimetric verification of surface and superficial doses for head and neck IMRT with different PTV shrinkage margins[J].Med Phys,2011,38(3):1435-1443.DOI:10.1118/1.3553406.
[8] 杜镭,徐寿平,马林,等.局部晚期鼻咽癌螺旋断层治疗中腮腺及脊髓实际受量研究[J].中华放射肿瘤学杂志,2010,19(4):292-295.DOI:10.3760/cma.j.issn.1004-4221.2010.04.004.Du L,Xu SP,Ma L,et al. Actual dose variations of the parotid glands and spinal cord during helical tomotherapy for patients with loco-regional advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma[J].Chin J Radiat Oncol,2010,19(4):292-295.DOI:10.3760/cma.j.issn.1004-4221.2010.04.004.
[9] 谷家冰,朱健,魏玉梅,等.螺旋断层放疗提升鼻咽癌放疗剂量的可行性研究[J].中华放射医学与防护杂志,2016,36(1):35-39.DOI:10.3760/cma.j.issn.0254-5098.2016.01.006.Gu JB,Zhu J,Wei YM,et al. The feasibility of prescription dose escalation for nasopharyngeal carcinoma cancer using helical tomotherapy[J].Chin J Radiol Med Prot,2016,36(1):35-39.DOI:10.3760/cma.j.issn.0254-5098.2016.01.006.
[10] 崔迪,戴相昆,马林,等.鼻咽癌螺旋断层放疗与常规加速器调强放疗的剂量学比较[J].中华放射肿瘤学杂志,2008,17(3):169-173.DOI:10.3321/j.issn:1004-4221.2008.03.003.Cui D,Dai XK,Ma L,et al. A dosimetric comparison between helical tomotherapy and linear accelerator-based intensity modulated radiation therapy for nasopharyngeal carcinoma[J].Chin J Radiat Oncol,2008,17(3):169-173.DOI:10.3321/j.issn:1004-4221.2008.03.003.
[11] 尹珍珍,高黎,罗京伟,等.鼻咽癌IMRT放射性溃疡临床及剂量因素分析[J].中华放射肿瘤学杂志,2016,25(5):438-442.DOI:10.3760/cma.j.issn.1004-4221.2016.05.004.Yin ZZ,Gao L,Luo JW,et al. An analysis of clinical and dosimetric factors for postradiation nasopharyngeal necrosis in intensity-modulated radiotherapy for nasopharyngeal carcinoma[J].Chin J Radiat Oncol,2016,25(5):438-442.DOI:10.3760/cma.j.issn.1004-4221.2016.05.004.
[12] Zhai RP,Kong FF,Du CR,et al. Radiation-induced hypothyroidism after IMRT for nasopharyngeal carcinoma:clinical and dosimetric predictors in a prospective cohort study[J].Oral Oncol,2017,68:44-49.DOI:10.1016/j.oraloncology.2017.03.005.
[13] 郭明,王胜资,吴朝霞,等.IMRT计划优化参数中听觉器官分区限制剂量研究[J].中华放射肿瘤学杂志,2015,24(4):438-441.DOI:10.3760/cma.j.issn.1004-4221.2015.04.021.Guo M,Wang SZ,Wu ZX,et al. The research of IMRT plan optimization on dose limitation of sub regional auditory organ[J].Chin J Radiat Oncol,2015,24(4):438-441.DOI:10.3760/cma.j.issn.1004-4221.2015.04.021.
[14] Wang RZ,Wu FE,Wang DM,et al. Clinical effect of biafine in preventing and treating radioactive skin destruction of nasopharyngeal carcinoma patients caused by concurrent intensity-modulated radiotherapy and chemotherapy[J].Chin J Clin Oncol,2008,5:58-63:DOI:10.1007/s11805-008-0058-7.
[15] 中国鼻咽癌临床分期工作委员会.2010鼻咽癌调强放疗靶区及剂量设计指引专家共识[J].中华放射肿瘤学杂志,2011,20(4):267-269.DOI:10.3760/cma.j.issn.1004-4221.2011.04.001.Committee on Clinical Staging of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma in China. Expert consensus on larget area and dose design guidelines for 2010 nasopharyngeal carcinoma patients with radiotherapy[J].Chin J Radiat Oncol,2011,20(4):267-269.DOI:10.3760/cma.j.issn.1004-4221.2011.04.001.
[16] Lee TF,Fang FM,Chao PJ,et al. Dosimetric comparisons of helical tomotherapy and step-and-shoot intensity-modulated radiotherapy in nasopharyngeal carcinoma[J].Radiother Oncol,2008,89(1):89-96.DOI:10.1016/j.radonc.2008.05.010.
[17] Lu SH,Cheng JCH,Kuo SH,et al. Volumetric modulated arc therapy for nasopharyngeal carcinoma:a dosimetric comparison with TomoTherapy and step-and-shoot IMRT[J].Radiother Oncol,2012,104(3):324-330.DOI:10.1016/j.radonc.2011.11.017.
[18] 李奇欣,岳麒,柏朋刚,等.鼻咽癌三种调强放疗计划剂量学对比研究[J].中华放射医学与防护杂志,2014,34(8):613-616.DOI:10.3760/cma.j.issn.0254-5098.2014.08.013.Li QX,Yue Q,Bai PG,et al. Dosimetric comparison of three intensity-modulate radiation therapy treatment modules for nasopharyngeal carcinoma[J].Chin J Radiol Med Prot,2014,34(8):613-616.DOI:10.3760/cma.j.issn.0254-5098.2014.08.013.
[19] 陈亚正,廖雄飞,黎杰,等.鼻咽癌螺旋断层放疗与固定野动态调强放疗的剂量学比较研究[J].肿瘤预防与治疗,2015,28(3):122-126:DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1674-0904.2015.03.003.Chen YZ,Liao XF,Li J,et al. The dosimetry comparison between tomotherapy and fixed fields dynamic intensity-modulated radiotherapy for nasopharyngeal carcinoma[J].J Cancer Control Treat,2015,28(3):122-126:DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1674-0904.2015.03.003.
[20] Lee N,Chuang C,Quivey JM,et al. Skin toxicity due to intensity-modulated radiotherapy for head-and-neck carcinoma[J].Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys,2002,53(3):630-637.DOI:10.1016/S0360-3016(02)02756-6.