Objective To validate the gross tumor volume (GTV) delineation in head and neck cancer based on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) or computed tomography (CT) by cross-sectional autopsy, and to provide a basis for clinical evaluation of the two imaging methods. Methods Ten New Zealand rabbits were selected for transplantation of VX2 carcinoma cells, and a head and neck cancer model was successfully established in six rabbits. Each rabbit was fixed and received MRI scan and CT scan in the same body position. Then, they were sacrificed and fixed in gelatin solution (-70℃) for 72 h;all cryopreserved rabbits underwent cross-sectional autopsy using a jig saw, with the same position and sectional thickness as in MRI scan and CT scan, and cross-sectional autopsy images were obtained using a digital single-lens reflex camera. GTVs were separately delineated based on CT, MRI, and cross-sectional autopsy images. The GTVMRI, GTVCT, GTVSA, and volume difference ratios (VDRs) were calculated;two-way classification ANOVA and paired t-test were used for difference analyses. Results The mean values of GTVMRI, GTVCT, and GTVSA were 8.20±2.56, 8.40±2.20, and 8.11±2.88 cm3, respectively, without significant differences among them (F=0.06,P=0.943). The mean values of VDRMRI-SA and VDRCT-SA were 0.180±0.060 and 0.309±0.091, respectively, with a significant difference between them (t=7.49, P=0.001). Conclusion The GTV delineation based on MRI is more accurate than that based on CT in head and neck cancer.
WANG Zhe,ZHENG Xiao-kang,YUAN Gong-jun et al. Validation of MRI-or CT-based gross tumor volume delineation in head and neck cancer:a comparative study[J]. Chinese Journal of Radiation Oncology, 2013, 22(3): 234-236.
[1] Chung NN, Ting LL, Hsu WC, et al. Impact of magnetic resonance imaging versus CT on nasopharyngeal carcinoma:primary tumor target delineation for radiotherapy. Head Neck,2004,26:241-246. [2] Daisne JF, Duprez T, Weynand B, et al. Tumor volume in pharyngolaryngeal squamous cell carcinoma:comparison at CT, MR imaging, and FDG PET and validation with surgical specimen. Radiology,2004,233:93-100. [3] Sun CJ, Li C, Yu JM, et al. Comparison of 64-slice CT perfusion imaging with contrast-enhanced CT for evaluating the target volume for three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy in the rabbit VX2 brain tumor model. J Radiat Res,2012,53:454-461. [4] 刘娅灵,罗世能,邹霈,等.X线造影剂碘佛醇注射液的制备及动物造影实验.中国现代应用药学,2005,22:100-102. [5] Seitz O, Chambron-Pinho N, Middendorp M, et al. 18F-Fluorodeoxyglucose-PET/CT to evaluate tumor, nodal disease, and gross tumor volume of oropharyngeal and oral cavity cancer:comparison with MR imaging and validation with surgical specimen. Neuroradiology,2009,51:677-686. [6] Zheng XK, Chen LH, Wang QS, et al. Influence of FDG-PET on computed tomography-based radiotherapy planning for locally recurrent nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys,2007,69:1381-1388. [7] 黄江琼,王安宇,朱小东,等.兔鼻咽VX2移植癌模型的建立及其生长转移特性.中国肿瘤临床,2009,36:222-226. [8] Buijsen J, van den Bogaard J, Janssen MH, et al. FDG-PET provides the best correlation with the tumor specimen compared to MRI and CT in rectal cancer. Radiother Oncol,2011,98:270-276.