基于ESAPI编译结构快速处理软件的实现与评估

doi:10.3760/cma.j.cn113030-20200805-00401

摘要
图/表
参考文献(13)
相关文章 (0)
点击分布统计
下载分布统计

全文: PDF (0 KB) HTML (1 KB)
输出: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS) 背景资料

摘要目的利用ESAPI功能开发靶区与危及器官结构快速处理软件,帮助放疗临床计划制作者简化各种常见的结构后处理操作。方法基于ESAPI功能开发SmartStructure脚本软件,并在临床工作中进行验证评估。选取直肠癌新辅助放疗、乳腺癌保乳术后放疗、宫颈癌术后放疗、鼻咽癌根治性放疗、肺部立体定向放疗(SBRT)病例各 10例,不同病种有不同的结构处理需求。每个病例分别采用常规手动处理方式(手动组)、使用SmartStructure脚本但不使用模板进行结构处理(SmaStru-N组)、使用SmartStructure脚本且使用针对该病种的临床辅助结构模板进行结构处理(SmaStru-P组)。比较3种方式的处理时间,并请临床工作者对脚本进行多方面评分,并对比脚本软件和手动两种方式的使用感受评分。结果上述3种方法均能在临床上正常使用。在出错率方面,手动组为7.0%,SmaStru-N组为3.0%,SmaStru-P组为0%。5种病例SmaStru-N组方式较手动组平均提升60.9%的靶区及危及器官处理时间,SmaStru-P组较手动组提升93.3%处理时间。SmartStructure脚本方式使用感受评分均高于手动方式。临床工作者对脚本“适用性”与“简便性”方面评分较低,“准确性”与“效率”方面评分较高。结论相较于常规手动处理结构方式,使用SmartStructure脚本软件能够快速准确地进行靶区与危及器官的结构处理,且随着病例需要处理结构数量的增加其优势更加明显。SmartStructure符合临床需求、降低出错率、提升计划处理速度、提升临床工作者的工作效率,为今后自适应放疗的发展提供基础。

	服务

	把本文推荐给朋友
	加入我的书架
	加入引用管理器
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	作者相关文章
	汪之群
	杨波
	张杰
	于浪
	王贝
	李文博
	朱皓
	王小深
	蓝茂英
	王兴柳
	周宗凯
	朱伟华
	张震
	胡克
	张福泉
	邱杰

关键词 ：软件工程, 结构处理时间, 感受评分, 性能评分, 效率评估

Abstract：Objective To help clinicians simplify the post-processing operations of structures by developing rapid processing software for target area and organs at risk structures based on ESAPI. Methods SmartStructure script software was developed based on ESAPI, verified and evaluated in clinical work. 10 cases of rectal cancer receiving neoadjuvant radiotherapy, 10 breast cancer treated with postoperative radiotherapy, 10 cervical cancer receiving postoperative radiotherapy, 10 nasopharyngeal carcinoma receiving radical radiotherapy and 10 lung stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) were selected, and different types of tumors had different post-processing operations of structures. In each case, three methods were used for post-processing of structures. In the control group (manual group), normal manual processing was employed. In the experimental group 1(SmaStru-N group), scripts without templates were utilized. In the experimental group 2(SmaStru-P group). scripts combined with templates were adopted. The processing time of the three methods was compared. Clinicians scored the scripting software from multiple aspects and compared the feeling scores of scripting software and manual operation. Results All three methods can be normally applied in clinical settings. The error rate in the manual group was 7.0%, 3.0% in the SmaStru-N group 0% in the SmaStru-P group, respectively. Compared with the manual method, SmaStru-N shortened the processing time of target area and organs at risk by 60.9% and 93.3% for SmaStru-P. In addition, SmartStructure was superior to manual method in terms of using feeling scores. Clinicians gave lower score for the"applicability" and"simplicity", and higher score on the"accuracy" and"efficiency". Conclusions Compared with conventional manual structure processing method, SmartStructure software can rapidly and accurately process all structures of the target area and organs at risk, and its advantages become more obvious with the increasing number of structures that need to be processed. SmartStructure software can meet clinical requirements, reduce the error rate, elevate processing speed, improve the working efficiency of clinicians, providing basis for the development of adaptive radiotherapy.

Key words： Software engineering Structure processing time Feeling score Performance score Efficiency assessment

收稿日期: 2020-08-05

基金资助:“十三五”国家重点研发计划项目(2016YFC0105206、2016YFC0105207)

通讯作者: 邱杰,Email:qj_ww@139.com

引用本文:

汪之群,杨波,张杰等. 基于ESAPI编译结构快速处理软件的实现与评估[J]. 中华放射肿瘤学杂志, 2021, 30(11): 1173-1177.

Wang Zhiqun,Yang Bo,Zhang Jie et al. Implementation and assessment of software based on ESAPI compilation structure[J]. Chinese Journal of Radiation Oncology, 2021, 30(11): 1173-1177.

链接本文:

http://journal12.magtechjournal.com/Jweb_fszlx/CN/10.3760/cma.j.cn113030-20200805-00401 或 http://journal12.magtechjournal.com/Jweb_fszlx/CN/Y2021/V30/I11/1173

[1] 曹瑞芬. 逆向调强放疗计划系统设计及其优化方法研究[D]北京:中国科学院大学,2009.
Cao RF. Study on the design and optimization of inverse intensity modulated radiotherapy planning system[D]. Beijing:University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, 2009.
[2] 王捷. 调强放射治疗中多目标优化方法研究[D]. 北京:中国科学院大学,2015.
Wang J. Study on multi-objective optimization of intensity modulated radiotherapy[D]. Beijing:University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, 2015.
[3] 阮长利,徐利明,宋启斌,等. 调强放疗的流程与计划设计技巧[J]. 肿瘤学杂志,2010, 16(6):496-498. DOI:CNKI:SUN:XHON.0.2010-06-023.
Ruan CL, Xu LM, Song QB, et al. The process and plan designing skills of intensity-modulated radiation therapy[J]. J Oncol, 2010, 16(6):496-498. DOI:CNKI:SUN:XHON.0.2010-06-023.
[4] 王东燕,李成,沈丹青,等. 剂量限制辅助结构模板优化鼻咽癌调强计划应用研究[J]. 中华肿瘤防治杂志,2019, 26(21):1617-1621. DOI:10.16073/j.cnki.cjcpt.2019.21.07.
Wang DY, Li C, Shen DQ, et al. Application study of dose-limiting structure template on intensity-modulated radiation therapy treatment planning optimization[J]. Chin J Cancer Prev Treat, 2019, 26(21):1617-1621. DOI:10.16073/j.cnki.cjcpt.2019.21.07.
[5] 顾科,李成,吴锦昌,等. 鼻咽癌调强放疗计划设计中自动勾画剂量限制结构的初步应用[J]. 国际生物医学工程杂志,2016, 39(5):299-302. DOI:10.3760/cma.j.issn.1673-4181.2016.05.009.
Gu K, Li C, Wu JC, et al. Application of automatic delineation of dose-limiting structures in intensity modulated radiation therapy for nasopharyngeal carcinoma[J]. Int J Biomed Eng, 2016, 39(5):299-302. DOI:10.3760/cma.j.issn.1673-4181.2016.05.009.
[6] 李成,沈丹青,吴锦昌,等. 编译工作流自动生成调强计划剂量限制结构的研究[J]. 生物医学工程与临床,2017, 21(3):267-270. DOI:10.13339/j.cnki.sglc.20170511.010.
Li C, Shen DQ, Wu JC, et al. Research on automatic dose limited structures generation by workflow tool of MIM software platform[J]. BME&Clin Med, 2017, 21(3):267-270. DOI:10.13339/j.cnki.sglc.20170511.010.
[7] 莫文杰,黄金汉,徐升,等. 基于Eclipse Scripting API的剂量限制结构生成系统的设计与实现[J]. 医疗卫生装备,2019, 40(10):44-48. DOI:10.19745/j.1003-8868.2019245.
Mo WJ, Huang JH, Xu S, et al. Design and implementation of dose limited structure generation system based on Eclipse Scripting API[J]. Chin Med Equip J, 2019, 40(10):44-48. DOI:10.19745/j.1003-8868.2019245.
[8] Huang YL, Yue HZ, Wang MJ, et al. Fully automated searching for the optimal VMAT jaw settings based on Eclipse Scripting Application Programming Interface (ESAPI) and RapidPlan knowledge-based planning[J]. J Appl Clin Med Phys, 2018, 19(3):177-182. DOI:10.1002/acm2.12313
[9] 莫文杰,黄金汉,徐升,等. 基于Eclipse Scripting API的放疗计划DVH 评估软件的开发[J]. 医疗卫生装备,2019, 40(3):26-30. DOI:10.19745/j.1003-8868.2019059.
Mo WJ, Huang JH, Xu S, et al. Development of DVH evaluation software for radiotherapy plan based on Eclipse Scripting API[J]. Chin Med Equip J, 2019, 40(3):26-30. DOI:10.19745/j.1003-8868.2019059.
[10] Covington EL, Chen X, Younge KC, et al. Improving treatment plan evaluation with automation[J]. J Appl Clin Med Phys, 2016, 17(6):16-31. DOI:10.1120/jacmp.v17i6.6322.
[11] 罗传文,莫文杰,黄金汉,等. 基于Eclipse Scripting API的放疗案例搜索系统的设计与实现[J]. 医疗卫生装备,2018, 39(10):31-34,42. DOI:10.7687/j.issn1003-8868.2018.10.031.
Luo CW, Mo WJ, Huang JH, et al. Design and implementation of radiotherapy case inquiry system based on Eclipse Scripting API[J]. Chin Med Equip J, 2018, 39(10):31-34,42. DOI:10.7687/j.issn1003-8868.2018.10.031.
[12] Kim H, Kwak J, Jung J, et al. Automated field-in-field (FIF) plan framework combining scripting application programming interface and user-executed program for breast forward IMRT[J]. Technol Cancer Res Treat, 2018, 17(1):1-10. DOI:10.1177/1533033818810391.
[13] Huang YL, Wu H, Hu QQ, et al. Dose calculation deviations induced by fractional image-guided-couch-shifts for Varian Halcyon MV cone beam CT[J]. Phys Med, 2019, 58(1):66-71. DOI:10.1016/j.ejmp.2019.01.015.