三维后装治疗中一种逆向剂量优化算法

doi:10.3760/cma.j.cn113030-20180815-00413

摘要
图/表
参考文献(16)
相关文章 (12)
点击分布统计
下载分布统计

全文: PDF (0 KB) HTML (1 KB)
输出: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS) 背景资料

摘要目的探讨三维后装治疗计划中一种逆向剂量优化算法(GBPO)的实现方法和结果。方法 GBPO使用标准的二次目标函数,优化代码基于LBFGS算法。回顾性选择了 7例使用不同施源器治疗的宫颈癌患者和 15例使用了三管施源器治疗的宫颈癌患者,先用等剂量线定性评估GBPO计划的质量,然后统计剂量体积直方图(DVH)参数(CTV D100%、V150%,危及器官D0.1cm³、D1.0cm³、D2.0cm³),评估GBPO计划、IPSA计划和Graphic计划之间的差异。结果对于使用不同施源器的 7例患者,GBPO都可以优化出适形的剂量分布,GBPO计划、IPSA计划和Graphic计划之间靶区和危及器官的DVH参数相近。对于使用了三管施源器的 15例患者,GBPO计划和IPSA计划之间DVH参数也相近,GBPO计划和Graphic计划之间危及器官DVH参数也相近,但是GBPO计划CTV的D100%高于Graphic计划(P<0.01),V150%低于Graphic计划(P<0.01)。结论采用逆向剂量优化算法GBPO制订的计划在靶区覆盖和危及器官保护方面与IPSA计划相似,GBPO可集成在三维后装治疗计划系统中。

	服务

	把本文推荐给朋友
	加入我的书架
	加入引用管理器
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	作者相关文章
	王先良
	王培
	李厨荣
	黎杰
	康盛伟
	刘敏
	汤婷
	杨凤
	侯氢

关键词 ：逆向计划优化, 治疗计划系统, 宫颈肿瘤/三维后装治疗

Abstract：Objective To explore an implementation method and results of an inverse dose optimization algorithm (gradient-based planning optimization, GBPO) in three-dimensional brachytherapy. Methods A standard quadratic objective function was used in the GBPO. The optimization code of GBPO was performed based on LBFGS (Limited memory Broyden Fletcher Goldberg Shanno). Seven cervical cancer patients using different applicators and 15 cervical cancer patients using the Fletcher applicator (Nucletron part#189.730) were retrospectively analyzed. The plan quality of GBPO was firstly assessed by isodose lines, then dose-volume histogram (DVH) parameters of CTV(D100%,V150%) and organs at risk(D0.1cm³,D1.0cm³,D2.0cm³) were used to evaluate the difference among the GBPO, IPSA and Graphic plans. Results For the 7 patients using different applicators, GBPO could optimize the conformal dose distribution, and the DVH parameters of the target and organs at risk were basically the same among the GBPO, IPSA and Graphic plans. For 15 patients using the Fletcher applicator, the difference in DVH parameters between the GBPO and IPSA plans was not statistically significant. There was no remarkable difference in the DVH parameters between the GBPO and Graphic plans, but the D100% of the GBPO plan was significantly higher (P<0.01), and the V150% was significantly lower (P<0.01) than that of the Graphic plan. Conclusions The quality of the GBPO plan is similar to that of the IPSA plan in terms of target coverage and organ protection. The inverse dose optimization algorithm GBPO can be integrated into a three-dimensional brachytherapy treatment planning system.

Key words： Inverse planning optimization Treatment planning system Cervical neoplasm/three-dimensional brachytherapy

收稿日期: 2018-08-15

通讯作者: 侯氢,Email:qhou@scu.edu.cn

引用本文:

王先良,王培,李厨荣等. 三维后装治疗中一种逆向剂量优化算法[J]. 中华放射肿瘤学杂志, 2020, 29(8): 676-681.

Wang Xianliang,Wang Pei,Li Churong et al. An inverse dose optimization algorithm for three-dimensional brachytherapy[J]. Chinese Journal of Radiation Oncology, 2020, 29(8): 676-681.

链接本文:

http://journal12.magtechjournal.com/Jweb_fszlx/CN/10.3760/cma.j.cn113030-20180815-00413 或 http://journal12.magtechjournal.com/Jweb_fszlx/CN/Y2020/V29/I8/676

[1] Lessard E, Pouliot J. Inverse planning anatomy-based dose optimization for HDR-brachytherapy of the prostate using fast simulated annealing algorithm and dedicated objective function[J]. Med Phys, 2001, 28(5):773-779. DOI:10.1118/1.1368127.
[2] Chajon E, Dumas I, Touleimat M, et al. Inverse planning approach for 3-D MRI-based pulse-dose rate intracavitary brachytherapy in cervix cancer[J]. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys, 2007, 69(3):955-961. DOI:10.1016/j.ijrobp.2007.07.2321.
[3] Trnková P, Pötter R, Baltas D, et al. New inverse planning technology for image-guided cervical cancer brachytherapy:description and evaluation within a clinical frame[J]. Radiother Oncol, 2009, 93(2):331-340. DOI:10.1016/j.radonc.2009.10.004.
[4] 余辉, 张书旭. 宫颈癌后装治疗剂量的调强优化方法[J]. 中国医学物理学杂志, 2014, 31(5):5114-5119. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2014.05.004.
Yu H, Zhang SX. The dosimetric optimizated method for HDR brachytherapy of cervix cancer[J]. Chin J Med Phys, 2014, 31(5):5114-5119. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2014.05.004.
[5] 余辉, 张书旭. 后装调强放疗计划系统的软件实现[J]. 中国医疗设备, 2014,(6):18-21. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1674-1633.2014.06.007.
Yu H, Zhang SX. Software design of inverse planning system for afterloading brachytherapy[J]. Chin Med Dev, 2014,(6):18-21. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1674-1633.2014.06.007.
[6] Liu DC, Nocedal J. On the limited memory BFGS method for large scale optimization[J]. Mathemat Program, 1989, 45(1-3):503-528. DOI:10.1007/BF01589116.
[7] Byrd RH, Lu P, Nocedal J, et al. A limited memory algorithm for bound constrained optimization[J]. J Sci Comput, 1995, 16(5):1190-1208. DOI:10.1137/0916069.
[8] Cunha A, Siauw T, Hsu IC, et al. A method for restricting intracatheter dwell time variance inhigh-dose-rate brachytherapy plan optimization[J]. Brachytherapy, 2016, 15(2):246-251. DOI:10.1016/j.brachy.2015.10.009.
[9] Potter R, Haie-Meder C, Van Limbergen E, et al. Recommendations from gynaecological (GYN) GEC ESTRO working group (Ⅱ):concepts and terms in 3D image-based treatment planning in cervix cancer brachytherapy-3D dose volume parameters and aspects of 3D image-based anatomy, radiation physics, radiobiology[J]. Radiother Oncol, 2006, 78(1):67-77. DOI:S0167-8140(05)00546-3.
[10] Brahme A. Development of radiation therapy optimization[J]. Acta Oncol, 2000, 39(5):579-595. DOI:10.1080/028418600750013 267.
[11] Jameson MG, Ohanessian L, Batumalai V, et al. Comparison of Oncentra Brachy IPSA and graphical optimisation techniques:a case study of HDR brachytherapy head and neck and prostate plans[J]. JMRS, 2015, 62(2):168–174. DOI:10.1002/jmrs.107.
[12] Jamema SV, Kirisits C, Mahantshetty U, et al. Comparison of DVH parameters and loading patterns of standard loading, manual and inverse optimization for intracavitary brachytherapy on a subset of tandem/ovoid cases[J]. Radiother Oncol, 2010, 97(3):501-506. DOI:10.1016/j.radonc.2010.08.011.
[13] Dinkla AM, Van DLR, Kaljouw E, et al. A comparison of inverse optimization algorithms for HDR/PDR prostate brachytherapy treatment planning[J]. Brachytherapy, 2015, 14(2):279-288. DOI:10.1016/j.brachy.2014.09.006.
[14] Panettieri V, Smith RL, Mason NJ, et al. Comparison of IPSA and HIPO inverse planning optimization algorithms for prostate HDR brachytherapy[J]. J Appl Clin Med Phys, 2014, 15(6):256-266. DOI:10.1120/jacmp.v15i6.5055.
[15] 郎锦义, 王培, 吴大可, 等. 2015年中国大陆放疗基本情况调查研究[J]. 中华放射肿瘤学杂志, 2016, 25(6):541-545. DOI:10.3760/cma.j.issn.1001-4221.2016.06.001.
Lang JY, Wang P, Wu DK, et al. An investigation of the basic situation of radiotherapy in mainland China in 2015[J]. Chin J Radiat Oncol, 2016, 25(6):541-545. DOI:10.3760/cma.j.issn.1001-4221.2016.06.001.
[16] Chen W, Sun K, Zheng R, et al. Cancer incidence and mortality in China, 2014[J]. Chin J Cancer Res, 2018, 30(1):1-12. DOI:10.21147/j.issn.1000-9604.2018.01.01.