[an error occurred while processing this directive]
中华放射肿瘤学杂志
   2025年4月17日 星期四     首 页 |  期刊介绍  |  编 委 会  |  投稿指南  |  期刊订阅  |  广告合作  |  学术影响  |  收录情况  |  联系我们  |  English
中华放射肿瘤学杂志  2020, Vol. 29 Issue (2): 88-92    DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1004-4221.2020.02.002
头颈部肿瘤 最新目录| 下期目录| 过刊浏览| 高级检索 [an error occurred while processing this directive]|[an error occurred while processing this directive]
SRT与SRS治疗肺腺癌脑转移瘤对比分析
李勇1, 刘风华2, 梁康宁1, 邵显军1, 张丽1, 梁晓华3, 潘绵顺1
1武警上海市总队医院武警部队肿瘤放射诊疗中心 201103;
2海军军医大学第三附属医院放疗科,上海 201805;
3复旦大学附属华山医院肿瘤科,上海 200040
A comparative analysis of SRT and SRS in the treatment of brain metastases from lung adenocarcinoma
Li Yong1, Liu Fenghua2, Liang Kangning1, Shao Xianjun1, Zhang Li1, Liang Xiaohua3, Pan Mianshun1
1Center of Radiation Oncology,Shanghai Wujing Hospital,Shanghai 201103,China;
2Center of Radiation Oncology,The Third Affiliated Hospital of Naval Military Medical University,Shanghai 201805,China;
3Department of Oncology,Huashan Hospital Affiliated to Fudan University,Shanghai 200040,China
全文: PDF (0 KB)   HTML (1 KB) 
输出: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      背景资料
摘要 目的 回顾性分析2006年1月至2016年12月间的肺腺癌脑转移瘤患者治疗疗效并进行相关因素分析。方法 多中心回顾性分析肺腺癌脑转移瘤患者208例,其中SRT患者86例,SRS患者122例。分析两组患者的临床特征并比较两组局部肿瘤控制时间、中位生存期及放射性脑损伤情况。结果 SRT、SRS的肿瘤客观缓解率分别为70.9%、71.3%,12个月局部肿瘤控制率分别为89%、86%(P=0.383)。全组中位总生存期为14.3个月,其中SRT为15.6个月,SRS为13.7个月(P=0.349)。多因素分析显示患者预后不佳的主要因素为靶区总体积较大(P<0.001)、GPA评分较低(P=0.012)及无敏感基因突变(P<0.001)。SRT、SRS晚期放射性脑损伤发生率分别为5.8%、14.8%(P=0.043)。结论 SRT与SRS治疗肺腺癌脑转移瘤疗效相似,SRT可能比SRS有更低的晚期放射性脑损伤发生率。
服务
把本文推荐给朋友
加入我的书架
加入引用管理器
E-mail Alert
RSS
作者相关文章
李勇
刘风华
梁康宁
邵显军
张丽
梁晓华
潘绵顺
关键词 脑转移/肺肿瘤立体定向放射疗法立体定向放射外科    
AbstractObjective To compare the clinical efficacy of stereotactic radiotherapy (SRT) and stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) in the treatment of brain metastases from January 2006 to December 2016,lung adenocarcinoma and analyze the related factors. Methods In this multi-center retrospective analysis, clinical data of 208 patients with brain metastases from lung adenocarcinoma were retrospectively analyzed and assigned into the SRT (n=86) and SRS groups (n=122). The clinical characteristics of patients in two groups were analyzed. The local tumor control rate,median survival time and radiation brain injury were statistically compared between two groups. Results At the end of follow-up,the Objective response rates (ORR) were 70.9% and 71.3% in the SRT and SRS groups (P=0.772). The local tumor control rates at 12 months were 89% and 86% in the SRT and SRS groups (P=0.383). The median overall survival time of all patients was 14.3 months,15.6 months in the SRT group and 13.7 months in the SRS group (P=0.349). Multivariate analysis showed that large target volume (P<0.001),low GPA score (P=0.012) and no insensitive gene mutation (P<0.001) were the main factors of poor prognosis. The incidence of late radiation brain injury was 5.8% and 14.8% in two groups (P=0.043). Conclusions SRT and SRS yield similar clinical efficacy in the treatment of brain metastases from lung adenocarcinoma. SRT may have a lower incidence of late radiation brain injury than SRS.
Key wordsBrain metastasis/lung neoplasms    Stereotactic radiotherapy    Stereotactic radiosurgery   
收稿日期: 2019-09-20     
基金资助:国家重点研发计划项目(2017YFC0113701);上海市长宁区肿瘤放射诊疗中心特色专科建设项目(20193006)
通讯作者: 潘绵顺,Email:panmianshun@126.com   
引用本文:   
李勇,刘风华,梁康宁等. SRT与SRS治疗肺腺癌脑转移瘤对比分析[J]. 中华放射肿瘤学杂志, 2020, 29(2): 88-92.
Li Yong,Liu Fenghua,Liang Kangning et al. A comparative analysis of SRT and SRS in the treatment of brain metastases from lung adenocarcinoma[J]. Chinese Journal of Radiation Oncology, 2020, 29(2): 88-92.
链接本文:  
http://journal12.magtechjournal.com/Jweb_fszlx/CN/10.3760/cma.j.issn.1004-4221.2020.02.002     或     http://journal12.magtechjournal.com/Jweb_fszlx/CN/Y2020/V29/I2/88
京公网安备11010502022167号
版权所有 © 2010《中华放射肿瘤学杂志》编辑部
地址:北京朝阳区潘学园南里17号 中国医学科学院肿瘤医院(100021)
电话:010-67700737,87788294 Email: cjron@cmaph.org
本系统由北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司设计开发 技术支持:Support@magtech.com.cn