[an error occurred while processing this directive]
中华放射肿瘤学杂志
   2025年4月7日 星期一     首 页 |  期刊介绍  |  编 委 会  |  投稿指南  |  期刊订阅  |  广告合作  |  学术影响  |  收录情况  |  联系我们  |  English
中华放射肿瘤学杂志  2016, Vol. 25 Issue (1): 67-70    DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1004-4221.2016.01.017
物理·生物·技术 最新目录| 下期目录| 过刊浏览| 高级检索 [an error occurred while processing this directive]|[an error occurred while processing this directive]
宫颈癌放疗计划中小肠3种勾画方法比较
孙彦泽,周钢,钱建军,陆雪官,田野
215004 苏州大学附属第二医院放疗科
The comparison of three bowel delineation strategies in the radiation therapy of cervical cancer
Sun Yanze,Zhou Gang,Qian Jianjun,Lu Xueguan,Tian Ye
Department of Radiation Oncology,Second Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University,Suzhou 215004,China
全文: PDF (1377 KB)   HTML (1 KB) 
输出: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      背景资料
摘要  目的 基于3种方法勾画小肠并分别制定放疗计划,评估小肠肠管受照剂量体积差异及3种勾画方法的可行性。方法 选择宫颈癌初期患者12例,处方剂量45 Gy分25次,分别以勾画小肠肠管法(BL)、肠袋法(BB)和勾画整个腹膜腔法(PS)为目标函数制定放疗计划,评估PTV的Dmax、Dmean、CI、HI和小肠肠管Dmax、Dmean、V5—V45差异并配对t检验。结果 BL与BB计划相比,PTV在Dmax、CI、HI上相近(P=0.171、0.076、0.192),Dmean不同(P=0.017);小肠肠管Dmax不同(P=0.038),V5—V45相近(P=0.315~0.855)。BL与PS计划下相比,PTV的Dmax、Dmean、CI、HI均不同(P=0.033、0.044、0.046、0.041),小肠肠管Dmax不同(P=0.013),V5—V45相近(P=0.416~0.977)。从计划结果看要想使小肠肠管V40≤15%,肠袋和腹膜腔V40应≤20%。结论 采用3种勾画方法制定的放疗计划都能使小肠肠管达到相似剂量体积,从PTV的CI、HI及小肠肠管Dmax控制方面,勾画肠袋较腹膜腔似乎更好一些。
服务
把本文推荐给朋友
加入我的书架
加入引用管理器
E-mail Alert
RSS
作者相关文章
孙彦泽
周钢
钱建军
陆雪官
田野
关键词 小肠勾画宫颈肿瘤/放射疗法剂量学    
Abstract:Objective To study three contouring approaches of the bowel and evaluate the bowel dose volume with cervical cancer patient. Methods Twelve patients were selected,prescribed dose 45 Gy/25f. For each patient we contoured the bowel according to three different definitions:bowel loops,bowel bag and peritoneal space. Then we generated three rival plans each considering a different bowel definition and to evaluate dose differences of the HI,CI of PTV and Dmax,Dmean,V5-V45 of bowel loops with paired t-test. Results Comparison between BL and BB plan,Dmax,HI and CI of PTV,V5-V45 of bowel loops were not significantly different (P=0.171,0.076,0.192,P=0.315-0.855),Dmean of PTV and Dmax of bowel loops had difference (P=0.017,0.038).Comparison between BL and PS plan,Dmax, Dmean,HI and CI of PTV and Dmax of bowel loops had differences (P=0.033,0.044,0.046,0.041,0.013),V5-V45 of bowel loops were not significantly different (P=0.416-0.977).If the bowel loops V40≤15%,and bowel bag and peritoneal space V40≤20%. Conclusions All definitions provided a very similar dose volume of bowel loops. Taking into account HI and CI of PTV and max dose of bowel loops,BB seems better than PS.
Key words Bowel delineation    Cervical neoplasms/radiotherapy    Dosimetry   
收稿日期: 2014-07-15     
通讯作者: 陆雪官,Email:luxueguan@163.com   
引用本文:   
孙彦泽,周钢,钱建军等. 宫颈癌放疗计划中小肠3种勾画方法比较[J]. 中华放射肿瘤学杂志, 2016, 25(1): 67-70.
Sun Yanze,Zhou Gang,Qian Jianjun et al. The comparison of three bowel delineation strategies in the radiation therapy of cervical cancer[J]. Chinese Journal of Radiation Oncology, 2016, 25(1): 67-70.
链接本文:  
http://journal12.magtechjournal.com/Jweb_fszlx/CN/10.3760/cma.j.issn.1004-4221.2016.01.017     或     http://journal12.magtechjournal.com/Jweb_fszlx/CN/Y2016/V25/I1/67
京公网安备11010502022167号
版权所有 © 2010《中华放射肿瘤学杂志》编辑部
地址:北京朝阳区潘学园南里17号 中国医学科学院肿瘤医院(100021)
电话:010-67700737,87788294 Email: cjron@cmaph.org
本系统由北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司设计开发 技术支持:Support@magtech.com.cn