[an error occurred while processing this directive]|[an error occurred while processing this directive]
千伏级锥形束CT图像质量和稳定性及三维影像体积重建精度研究
汪隽琦, 徐志勇, 胡伟刚, 李龙根, 彭佳元
200032 上海,复旦大学上海医学院肿瘤学系 复旦大学附属肿瘤医院放疗科
Quantitative analysis of image quality, stability and volume precision in kilovoltage cone beam CT
WANG Jun-qi, XU Zhi-yong, HU Wei-gang, LI Long-gen, PENG Jia-yuan
Department of Radiation Oncology, Cancer Hospital of Fudan University;Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College of Fudan University;Shanghai 200032, China
Corresponding author:XU Zhi-yong, Email:xzyong12@vip.sina.com
Objective To quantitatively evaluate the image quality, stability and volume precision in kilovoltage cone beam CT (CBCT) on Varian linear accelerator. Methods The Catphan600 phantom was repeatedly scanned in the full-fan and half-fan CBCT scanning modes. A simulation fan-beam CT (FBCT) was used as a benchmark and results related to the low contrast resolution, spatial resolution, uniformity and image noise were compared with the CBCT using the treatment planning system. The comparison of image quality and long-term stability and volume precision was analyzed. Results Spatial resolution was no differences observed between FBCT and CBCT (6 lp/cm∶6 lp/cm,T=18.00, P>0.05). Low contrast resolution was, on average, 1.65% and 1.74% for both CBCTFull-Fan and CBCTHalf-Fan, and 1.03% for the FBCT (T=6.00, P<0.05). Uniformity was, on average, 0.005 and 0.033 for both, and 0.003 for the FBCT (T=6.00, P<0.05). In terms of image noise, the FBCT images were superior to the CBCT (T=30.00, P<0.05). In valid scan range of the CBCT, reconstructed precision was high. There was no significant time trend in the image quality. Conclusions The image quality of kilovoltage CBCT is inferior to the conventional CT. However, tumor and soft tissues are visible in the CBCT images. The image stability and reconstructed precision is satisfying.
WANG Jun-qi,XU Zhi-yong,HU Wei-gang et al. Quantitative analysis of image quality, stability and volume precision in kilovoltage cone beam CT[J]. Chinese Journal of Radiation Oncology, 2012, 21(2): 176-180.
[1] Bissonnette JP, Moseley DJ, Jaffray DA.A quality assurance program for image quality of cone-beam CT guidance in radiation therapy. Med Phys,2008,35:1807-1815. [2] American association of physicists in medicine. AAPM Report No.39 Specification and acceptance testing for computed tomopraphy scanners. New Yok:American association of physicists in medicine,1993:26-31. [3] Lehmann J, Perks J, Semon S, et al. Commissioning experience with cone-beam computed tomography for image-guided radiation therapy. J Appl Clin Med Phys,2007,8:21-36. [4] Siewerdsen JH, Jaffray DA.Cone-beam computed tomography with a flat-panel imager:magnitude and effects of X-ray scatter. Med Phys,2001,28:220-231. [5] 戴建荣,胡逸民.图像引导放疗的实现方式.中华发射肿瘤学杂志,2006,15:132-135. [6] Letourneau D, Wong R,Moseley D,et al. Online planning and delivery technique for radiotherapy of spinal metastases using cone-beam CT:image quality and system performance. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys,2007,67:1229-1237. [7] Stützel J, Oelfke U, Nill S.A quantitative image quality comparison of four different image guided radiotherapy devices. Radiother Oncol,2008,86:20-24. [8] Vinall AJ, Tomes J. Initial experience of acuity cone beam CT. Varian users meeting,Malaga,2004. Malaga:Varian Inc,2004. [9] Van′t Veld AA, Bruinvis IA. Influence of shape on the accuracy of grid-based volume computations. Med Phys,1995,22:1377-1385. [10] Palomo JM, Subramanyan K, Hans M,et al. Influence of mA settings and a copper filter in CBCT image resolution. Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg,2006,1:391-393. [11] Ning R, Tang X, Conover D.X-ray scatter correction algorithm for cone beam CT imaging. Med Phys,2004,31:1195-1202. [12] Spies L, Ebert M, Groh BA, et al. Correction of scatter in megavoltage cone beam CT.Phys Med Biol,2001,46:821-833. [13] Siewerdsen JH, Daly MJ, Bakhtiar B, et al. A simple,direct method for X-ray scatter estimation and correction in digital radiography and cone-beam CT. Med Phys,2006,33:187-197. [14] Mail N, Moseley DJ, Siewerdsen JH, et al. The influence of bowtie filtration on cone-beam CT image quality. Med Phys,2009,36:22-32.