情报科学 ›› 2025, Vol. 43 ›› Issue (6): 172-180.

• 博士论坛 • 上一篇    下一篇

政策工具视域下中国特色新型高校智库政策内容探赜

  

  • 出版日期:2025-06-05 发布日期:2025-10-16

  • Online:2025-06-05 Published:2025-10-16

摘要: 【目的/意义】当前新型高校智库建设出现的库多、智“枯”和缺尖少优等问题,使得完善相关政策尤为必要。 开展新型高校智库政策研究,对优化政策设计具有借鉴意义。【方法/过程】即以政府和高校发布的173份新型高校 智库政策文本为研究对象,借助文本分析法,从政策工具、智库功能、社会系统论和外部结构维度展开分析。【结果/ 结论】研究发现:政策工具的使用比例不协调,过溢与不足并存,且与智库功能匹配不均衡;多元主体参与不足,信 息技术赋能薄弱;部门发文缺少协同,政策设计倾斜,总体效力偏低。据此,提出了优化建议。【创新/局限】探索了 融合政策工具、智库功能、社会系统论及外部结构于一体的新型高校智库政策分析模型。未来可从法治建设、信息 技术赋能和政策协同等方面深化政策研究。

Abstract: 【Purpose/significance】The current problems of a large number of think tanks, a lack of intelligence, and a shortage of topnotch and excellent ones in the construction of new-type university think tanks make it particularly necessary to improve relevant poli⁃ cies. Conducting policy research on new-type university think tanks has reference significance for optimizing policy design【. Method/ process】Taking 173 policy texts of new-type university think tanks released by the government and universities as the research object, using text analysis method, the analysis is carried out from the dimensions of policy tools, think tank functions, social system theory, and external structure【. Result/conclusion】The study found that the proportion of policy tools used is not coordinated, with both excess and deficiency coexisting, and the matching with the functions of think tanks is unbalanced; Insufficient participation of multiple stake⁃ holders and weak empowerment of information technology; Lack of collaboration in departmental publications, biased policy design, and overall low effectiveness. Based on this, optimization suggestions were proposed.【Innovation/limitation】This paper explores a new-type university think tanks policy analysis model which integrates policy tools, think tank functions, social system theory and ex⁃ ternal structures. In the future, policy research can be deepened in areas such as rule of law construction, information technology em⁃ powerment, and policy coordination.